The Cabinet's latest policy to allow more migrant workers under certain conditions to address local labor shortages has drawn criticism from labor groups, who questioned whether it would help address the low wages and systemic constraints faced by such workers.
Citing demographic challenges — a low birth rate, aging population and skilled labor shortage — the Cabinet yesterday approved a series of measures allowing manufacturers to hire additional migrant workers beyond their existing quotas, and permitting the hospitality sector and ports to recruit migrant workers.
To hire one additional migrant worker beyond the fixed quota allocated to a business, employers must raise the monthly salary of a local employee by NT$2,000 (US$61.38) and keep the number of such hires under 10 percent of their workforce, according to the plan proposed by the Minister of Labor (MOL).
Photo: Lee Chin-hui, Taipei Times
Also included is a plan to scrap the rule that currently allows employers to retain up to 25 percent of their migrant workers as "intermediate skilled foreign workers," while keeping in place the cap that limits the total number of foreign workers to no more than 50 percent of a company's workforce.
Taiwan introduced the "Long-term Retention of Skilled Foreign Workers Program" in 2022, under which employers can reclassify migrant workers who have been employed for over six years as "intermediate skilled foreign workers," eligible for a higher minimum salary and a potential path to permanent residency.
Commenting on the plans, Secretary-General of the Taiwan Labor Front Yang Shu-wei (楊書瑋) said the government should assess the actual situation and causes of labor shortages, rather than simply easing restrictions on the hiring of foreign workers.
Is industry really facing a labor shortage, or is it just because employers are looking for cheaper labor?" Yang said in a telephone interview with CNA.
Given that migrant workers are usually paid the minimum wage of NT$28,590 — excluding live-in caregivers who are not covered by the Labor Standards Act — allowing more migrant hires while only raising local workers' pay will result in greater wage disparities for the same work based solely on nationality, Yang said.
Yang further pointed out that Taiwan's migrant workforce has grown rapidly since the COVID-19 pandemic, surpassing 850,000 by the end of last month — an increase of 110,000 from two years ago — yet the government has not established annual recruitment limits as required under the Employment Service Act.
Separately, Grace Huang (黃姿華), secretary-general of the Taoyuan-based Domestic Caretaker Union, said the Cabinet's plan to lift the 25-percent cap on employers reclassifying migrant workers as "intermediate skilled foreign workers" would not meaningfully benefit them.
According to Ministry of Labor data, 22,283 migrant workers in the manufacturing and construction sectors have been reclassified as "intermediate skilled migrant workers," representing 4.15 percent of migrant workers in those industries, while 33,413 caregivers were reclassified, accounting for 14.88 percent of migrant workers in the nursing sector.
"The proportion of migrant workers reclassified as intermediate skilled is so low because employers remain reluctant to pay higher wages, especially since they can continue hiring migrant workers at lower pay," Huang said.
If industries do not need a higher proportion of "intermediate skilled migrant workers," it is unclear why the government is proposing this policy, she added.
In a media release yesterday, the Migrants Empowerment Network in Taiwan called the policy of reclassifying workers as "intermediate skilled migrant workers" a "fraud in the name of improving labor conditions" that hides the long-standing low wages and systemic constraints faced by migrant workers.
One of the systemic constraints is that migrant workers cannot freely change employers except under certain circumstances permitted by the Ministry of Labor, which increases their vulnerability to exploitation, Huang said.
She noted that the Cabinet's approval of these measures may have been driven by pressure from industries seeking to hire more migrant workers.
In addition, the Executive Yuan has approved plans to establish recruitment centers in migrant workers' home countries, aiming to strengthen the direct hiring of workers through government-to-government agreements.
Huang said the policy is likely a response to US criticism over forced labor, citing Giant Manufacturing Co. Ltd., whose Taiwan made bicycles and parts were blocked by US customs over forced labor concerns, including excessive brokerage fees charged to migrant workers under the labor brokerage system.
She urged the government to set clear targets for the program rather than treating it as a symbolic announcement.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS