Two former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) officials on Saturday said that recent comments by AIT on Taiwan's political status are consistent with the long-standing position of the US on the issue.
Former AIT chair Richard Bush and former AIT deputy director Robert Wang both said in separate e-mails that the US does not consider the political status of Taiwan to have been determined by any post-World War II documents, and that Washington expects the issue to be resolved peacefully.
Photo: Reuters
Wang cited the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), a 1979 US law governing its exchanges with Taiwan after Washington switched diplomatic recognition to Beijing.
The TRA made clear that "the United States' decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China (PRC) rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means," he wrote.
"In other words, the TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the political status of Taiwan to have been determined by any previous documents, including the World War II-era declarations or treaties," he wrote.
Bush shared a similar view, saying the US has long stated that "cross-strait differences should be resolved peacefully and with the assent of the people of Taiwan."
Both former US envoys made the remarks when asked to comment on AIT's statement on Saturday responding to China's reliance on World War II-era documents, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, as justification for its sovereignty claim over Taiwan.
On Aug. 15, after the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Foreign Ministers' Meeting held in Anning, Yunnan, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation "clearly defined Japan's responsibility for the war and required that Japan return all the territories it had stolen from China, including Taiwan."
He described this as "an indisputable outcome of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and constitutes an important part of the post-war international order."
Asked to comment on the issue, an unnamed AIT spokesperson said on Saturday that China "intentionally mischaracterizes World War II-era documents, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Treaty of San Francisco, "to try to support its coercive campaign to subjugate Taiwan."
"Beijing's narratives are simply false, and none of these documents determined Taiwan's ultimate political status," the spokesperson said.
"False legal narratives are part of Beijing's broader campaign to try to isolate Taiwan from the international community and constrain the sovereign choices of other countries regarding their interactions with Taiwan," the spokesperson added.
AIT's comments on the issue echoed Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung's (林佳龍) Aug. 16 statement rebuking Wang's remarks.
Lin said that after World War II, the San Francisco Peace Treaty — binding under international law — superseded the political statements made in the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation.
The treaty did not cede Taiwan to the PRC, and the PRC has never governed Taiwan, officially named the Republic of China (ROC), he said.
Lin said that the ROC government is the "sole legitimate government" administering Taiwan and representing it internationally.
He added that this established the cross-strait "status quo" in which the ROC (Taiwan) and the PRC exist as equals, with neither subordinate to the other.
Chinese officials have repeatedly asserted that the 1943 Cairo Declaration and 1945 Potsdam Declaration are two historical documents which prove that China has jurisdiction over Taiwan.
However, both documents only set the conditions for Japan's surrender, including forfeiting control of Taiwan and restoring it to the ROC.
The PRC was founded in 1949 following the Chinese Civil War, when the ROC government relocated to Taiwan.
The 1951 Treaty of San Francisco formalized Japan's renunciation of sovereignty over Taiwan, but it did not specify a recipient.
The military has spotted two Chinese warships operating in waters near Penghu County in the Taiwan Strait and sent its own naval and air forces to monitor the vessels, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said. Beijing sends warships and warplanes into the waters and skies around Taiwan on an almost daily basis, drawing condemnation from Taipei. While the ministry offers daily updates on the locations of Chinese military aircraft, it only rarely gives details of where Chinese warships are operating, generally only when it detects aircraft carriers, as happened last week. A Chinese destroyer and a frigate entered waters to the southwest
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comment last year on Tokyo’s potential reaction to a Taiwan-China conflict has forced Beijing to rewrite its invasion plans, a retired Japanese general said. Takaichi told the Diet on Nov. 7 last year that a Chinese naval blockade or military attack on Taiwan could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, potentially allowing Tokyo to exercise its right to collective self-defense. Former Japan Ground Self-Defense Force general Kiyofumi Ogawa said in a recent speech that the remark has been interpreted as meaning Japan could intervene in the early stages of a Taiwan Strait conflict, undermining China’s previous assumptions
Taiwan Railways Corp (TRC) today announced that Shin Kong Mitsukoshi has been selected as the preferred bidder to operate the Taipei Railway Station shopping mall, replacing the current operator, Breeze Development Co Ltd. Among eight qualified firms that delivered presentations and were evaluated by a review committee, Shin Kong Mitsukoshi was ranked first, while Breeze was named the runner-up, the rail company said in a statement. Contract negotiations are to proceed in accordance with regulations, it said, adding that if negotiations with the top bidder fail, it could invite the second-ranked applicant to enter talks. Breeze in a statement today expressed doubts over
UNFOUNDED CONCERNS: Public concerns that allowing Indian workers to come and work in Taiwan would lead to increased sex crimes are baseless, the labor ministry said Amid public concern over the government’s plan to bring Indian workers to Taiwan, the Ministry of Labor (MOL) pointed to past intake and said that public safety remained stable. Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 told the legislature that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as the end of this year. Taiwan and India signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in February 2024 to address Taiwan’s labor shortage. The MOU was sent to the Legislative Yuan for review in mid-2024 and received cross-party backing, prompting the MOL to begin follow-up negotiations with India, Hung said. Public
RSS