US experts on Friday said that US President Donald Trump might adopt a fluid strategy toward cross-strait relations, shifting between stronger support for Taiwan and pursuing a deal with China, adding that the outcome of the recall campaign raises concerns about Taiwan’s national security investments, while Beijing sees the results as a chance to weaken the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush and foreign policy analyst Ryan Hass published an article on Friday titled “Taiwan’s recall vote: Implications for Taiwan, China, and the United States” on the Washington think tank Brookings’ Web site.
Bush and Hass first discussed the recall campaign’s outcome, saying: “Taiwan’s government remains divided,” as not a single Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator was recalled.
Photo: REUTERS
They questioned whether the KMT would be able to capitalize on this momentum and build more public support in upcoming elections.
From Washington’s perspective, if the outcome leads to a prolonged political deadlock that hinders Taiwan’s national security investments, it would “raise concerns ... about Taiwan’s readiness for self-defense,” they said.
Conversely, if the outcome stirs a political contest “to persuade voters of who can best protect peace and preserve the status quo, then it could have a moderating effect on Taiwan’s political discourse” — a development that would be welcomed by Washington, they added.
Beijing “likely feels relieved” at the outcome, as the DPP would “struggle to pass major increases in defense spending or other signature initiatives,” the article said.
Beijing would try to diminish public support for the DPP by discrediting its leaders and “encourage greater support for Taiwan leaders who are supportive of deeper cross-strait engagement,” it said.
However, they said that while “the question of what lessons Beijing will draw from the recall campaign presently is unknowable,” from now to the 2028 elections, China is unlikely to “exert so much pressure that it alienates voters who might otherwise support the KMT,” and would likely adopt a “calibrated, two-handed approach.”
If Beijing does put more pressure on Taiwan, US political leaders would call on Trump to show more support for Taiwan, they said.
“This could include greater rhetorical support for Taiwan, increased arms sales, higher visibility US military presence operations around Taiwan, or more visible high-level interactions between US and Taiwan officials,” they added.
Trump is likely to show more support for Taiwan if he is “focused on protecting his self-image of strength and resolve,” it said.
However, if Trump is looking to make a deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), he might use US policy toward Taiwan as a bargaining chip to reach a favorable trade deal with China, they said.
Trump is likely to oscillate between these two approaches, like he has shifted his stance on Ukraine and NATO in recent months.
“Trump views his unpredictability as a strategic asset,” they wrote.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang