China’s live-fire drills in April and earlier this month serve a dual purpose: challenging the US-led coalition politically and enhancing its ability to project sea power to further its ambitions, a Taiwanese defense expert said.
In an analysis for the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based government-affiliated think tank, analyst Tsiam Siong-ui (詹祥威) said that China’s drills were closely timed in response to joint exercises conducted by the US, Japan and the Philippines.
Citing an example, he said that China’s live-fire drills in April followed an outbreak of confrontations between the Chinese and Philippine coast guards near the disputed Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), which included ship collisions that resulted in hull damage and injuries.
Photo: EPA-EFE
Evidence from the clashes reinforces the view that Beijing has been a persistent aggressor, he added.
The China Coast Guard conducted an average of 95 ship-days of patrols from January to last month, almost double the monthly average of 48 ship-days recorded from August to December last year, Tsiam said.
This increased patrol frequency was directly responsible for the surge in hostile interactions at sea with the Philippine Coast Guard, with nearly 12 incidents occurring per month, he said.
China’s live-fire exercise in April appeared to be a direct response to the US-Philippine joint exercise, the Maritime Cooperative Activity, Tsiam said.
The more recent drill, held from June 18 to June 20, was scheduled almost immediately following training and patrol operations by the US aircraft carrier USS Nimitz and destroyer USS Curtis Wilbur in the South China Sea, he said.
Additionally, Japan and the Philippines’ own joint maritime security drill occurred just one day before China’s announcement of its latest live-fire exercise, Tsiam said.
These actions suggest Beijing’s intent to intensify the frequency and scale of its drills, reinforcing its aim to establish control as a fait accompli, Tsiam explained.
However, the drills also serve practical military purposes. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs to turn China’s near waters into a secure base of operations should it engage in a Taiwan invasion or a conflict further afield, he said.
Current Chinese military doctrine emphasizes using three tiers of naval forces — the Chinese Maritime Militia, the coast guard and the PLA Navy (PLAN) — to engage in low, medium and high-intensity conflicts, Tsiam said.
The PLA Southern Military Command’s main tool to ensure the three naval arms operate together efficiently is the live-fire exercise, he said, adding that the exercise area, situated 12 nautical miles (22.2km) from Hainan, aligns with PLAN operational requirements.
China’s unprecedented simultaneous deployment this month of two carrier strike groups, centered around the Liaoning and the Shandong, was no accident, but instead a deliberate display of strength, he said.
The concurrent deployment of the two carriers was intended to signal that PLAN has operationalized new technologies ahead of schedule and attained naval capabilities that are a strategic match to those of the US and Japan, he said.
Taken together, China’s exercises enabled Beijing to project strength to an international and domestic audience, demonstrate its ability to respond quickly to unforeseen situations and enhance its military capabilities, he added.
While Beijing is currently focused on maintaining regional equilibrium, its swift response to actions by the US, Japan and the Philippines suggests it possesses a significant capability to exploit international conditions, he said.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
Taiwanese celebrities Hank Chen (陳漢典) and Lulu Huang (黃路梓茵) announced yesterday that they are planning to marry. Huang announced and posted photos of their engagement to her social media pages yesterday morning, joking that the pair were not just doing marketing for a new show, but “really getting married.” “We’ve decided to spend all of our future happy and hilarious moments together,” she wrote. The announcement, which was later confirmed by the talent agency they share, appeared to come as a surprise even to those around them, with veteran TV host Jacky Wu (吳宗憲) saying he was “totally taken aback” by the news. Huang,
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult