Sun, Jun 22, 2025 page3

• Removed repeated signatures not forgeries, CEC says

  • By Lee Wen-hsin / Staff reporter, with CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The Central Election Commission (CEC) yesterday said the removal of “repeated signatures” from recall vote petitions was done according to the law, not due to forgery.

  The CEC on Friday announced that the recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have passed its review.

  It also published the results of its review of recall petition signatures, including a statistical table that lists the types of invalid signatures in each recall motion, such as ineligible age, ineligible length of residence in the electoral district, “death before signing” and repeated signing.

  

  A woman casts her ballot at a polling station during the presidential and parliamentary elections in Taipei on Jan. 13 last year.

  Photo: Carlos Garcia Rawlins, Reuters

  Invalid signature types also include phase two petitioners already being phase one proposers, having a wrong or unclear name, a wrong or unclear address, missing or wrong identification number, unclear name stamp or no signature, and forgery.

  KMT caucus deputy secretary-general Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) yesterday said that according to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), proposers of recall motions during the first phase may not be phase two petitioners.

  The CEC’s review found there were many repeated signatures by proposers in phase two petitions for recalls against KMT legislators, up to thousands of signatures in some cases, she said.

  With such a high repetition rate, although phase one proposers can come back to “re-sign” a phase two petition, it is more reasonable to suspect that the recall groups used the names and personal information of phase one proposers to fill in the phase two petitions, or even copied their signatures, Chen said.

  Prosecutors previously searched the headquarters of local KMT chapters during its investigation into forged signatures or signatures of deceased people in recall motions targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, so they should apply the same standards in investigating the civic groups that initiated recall motions against KMT lawmakers, she said.

  The CEC yesterday said that if either forgery or signatures of deceased people were found, the commission has a duty to report it to prosecutors, in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法).

  There has been no differential treatment for such cases, and it is the same now, without any exceptions, the commission said.

  The removal of repeated signatures is conducted according to the law, and is not associated with forgery, the CEC said, adding that it has always been done this way and it would continue to be so.

  DPP Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) wrote on social media that most of the invalid signatures in the phase two petitions were repeated signatures by phase one proposers.

  The civic groups that initiated the recalls did not know which signatures from phase one proposers would be removed during the first review, so they urged all phase one proposers to also sign the phase two petition, he said, adding that if they had been counted as a phase one proposer, their phase two petition signature would be deemed a “repeat signature” and would thus be invalid.

  This is totally different from the KMT’s forgery issues, Wang said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Chinese ships expelled from near Pratas Island

  • 2

    Taiwan to lose 6.67m workers in two retirement waves

  • 3

    ‘Fujian’ carrier to pose steep defense challenge

  • 4

    Two tropical depressions form, one typhoon forecast

  • 5

    AIT comments on Taiwan accurate: State Department