The Consumer Protection Committee today released standard regulations for pet grooming services, stipulating that businesses should clearly explain pricing methods, ask if pets are aggressive and charge an additional fee if pets are left at the shop for an extended period.
With a growing proportion of households adopting pets, more businesses are offering pet grooming services from nail trimming to bathing.
The committee in a news release today announced its new “Standard Contracts for Dog and Cat Grooming Services,” with the Ministry of Agriculture responsible for enforcement.
Photo: Taipei Times
Committee deputy director Chen Hsing-hung (陳星宏) said that the regulations are intended to prevent disputes between consumers and businesses, and balance both parties’ rights.
There were 17 disputes over pet grooming last year, most commonly over unclear pricing, with pet owners asked to pay extra fees before being able to retrieve their pets, Chen said.
The new regulations would be binding to both parties, preventing similar disputes, he said.
Other disputes have arisen because owners failed to pick up their pets on time, inconveniencing the business by leaving pets in their care, Chen said.
The regulations stipulate that businesses may charge late pickup fees and additional care fees if the pet is not picked up by the end of the business day, he said.
The additional daily fee cannot exceed more than three times the original service fee, he added.
The regulations also stipulate contract termination and refund policies, Chen said.
If the service provider is at fault, it must refund the customer within three days, Chen said.
If the service cannot be completed due to unavoidable disasters, any fees already collected must be refunded, he said.
In addition, if the consumer has prepaid for services, but decides not to continue, they may terminate the contract, Chen said.
A processing fee may be charged in such cases, not exceeding NT$1,000 or 5 percent of the total contract amount, he said.
If businesses use a standardized contract, but contravene the provisions, they may be fined NT$30,000 to NT$300,000 if they fail to correct the issue within the given deadline, the committee said.
If they fail to do so again upon a second warning, they may be fined NT$50,000 to NT$500,000, with additional penalties for each subsequent contravention, it said.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS