A student advocacy group on Friday released the results of a gender equity survey conducted at 17 universities across Taiwan, revealing that all institutions fell short in areas such as support for LGBT students and the functioning of legally required gender equity committees.
Under the Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法), every school in Taiwan must have a gender equity committee to “investigate and handle cases” related to gender equity at schools and “plan and establish a safe and gender-fair campus,” among other responsibilities.
Among those 17 universities, “two did not make their gender equity committee member lists available, and only two disclosed members’ stances on gender equity or relevant professional experience,” said Sydney Shao (邵思宇) of the Student Alliance for Gender Equality.
Photo: CNA
Shao, who also serves as a student member of National Taiwan University’s (NTU) gender equity committee, said that none of the 17 universities allow students to participate in the committee’s selection process, and 10 of them do not even disclose the criteria used to select committee members.
“How can students who have been hurt feel reassured under such an opaque system?” Shao asked.
Even if a student decides to file a complaint, they are faced with a “harsh reality” of severely understaffed gender equity committees, Shao added.
Six of the surveyed universities have no full-time personnel handling gender equity affairs, with responsibilities managed part-time by other staff, Shao said, adding that at universities with dedicated staff — such as NTU — one full-time officer is responsible for the needs of nearly 8,000 students.
For people with diverse gender identities, Lillian Hsiao (蕭錦蓮), a student at Kaohsiung Medical University’s Graduate Institute of Gender Studies, said that Article 20 of the act stipulates that “teachers shall maintain an awareness of gender equity, eliminate gender stereotypes, and avoid gender prejudice and discrimination.”
However, many institutions have yet to fully implement such support, Hsiao said, citing data showing that only four of the 17 universities established anonymous reporting mechanisms that are consistently available to address discrimination.
Hsiao said that a nonbinary student once shared with the group that a teacher had publicly questioned them in class, asking: “Are you a boy or a girl?”
“Most of the classmates laughed at the question, while the student remained silent, as they did not know who they could report it to and were afraid that speaking up might affect their grades,” Hsiao said.
“This kind of discrimination based on gender identity makes it impossible for students to feel reassured while in class,” Hsiao added.
Outside the classroom, dormitory arrangements in most schools are also far from inclusive, especially for transgender students, according to Josephine Tai (戴靜茹), a student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
Only six universities provide gender-friendly dormitories, and 14 have not made their transfer mechanisms for gender-diverse students publicly available, Tai said.
When seeking to change dormitories, transgender students often cannot find a designated contact point or clear procedures to follow, leaving them in a state of
uncertainty and anxiety throughout the process, Tai added.
Wu Lin-hui (吳林輝), head of the Ministry of Education’s Department of Student Affairs and Special Education, on Friday said that the ministry had previously conducted a survey and also found that some institutions lacked stable staffing to handle gender equity affairs.
While such a type of staffing falls under university autonomy, Wu said the ministry had sent notices to universities as a follow-up to its own survey, urging them to prioritize the allocation of full-time personnel.
On the lack of gender-friendly dormitories, Wu said that, unlike barrier-free facilities, such dormitories are not explicitly mandated under current building regulations.
The ministry is promoting gender-friendly dormitories through policy guidance and resource support to help universities “move forward at a quicker pace” toward achieving gender equity, he added.
The manufacture of the remaining 28 M1A2T Abrams tanks Taiwan purchased from the US has recently been completed, and they are expected to be delivered within the next one to two months, a source said yesterday. The Ministry of National Defense is arranging cargo ships to transport the tanks to Taiwan as soon as possible, said the source, who is familiar with the matter. The estimated arrival time ranges from late this month to early next month, the source said. The 28 Abrams tanks make up the third and final batch of a total of 108 tanks, valued at about NT$40.5 billion
Two Taiwanese prosecutors were questioned by Chinese security personnel at their hotel during a trip to China’s Henan Province this month, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. The officers had personal information on the prosecutors, including “when they were assigned to their posts, their work locations and job titles,” MAC Deputy Minister and spokesman Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) said. On top of asking about their agencies and positions, the officers also questioned the prosecutors about the Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement, a pact that serves as the framework for Taiwan-China cooperation on combating crime and providing judicial assistance, Liang
A group from the Taiwanese Designers in Australia association yesterday represented Taiwan at the Midsumma Pride March in Melbourne. The march, held in the St. Kilda suburb, is the city’s largest LGBTQIA+ parade and the flagship event of the annual Midsumma Festival. It attracted more than 45,000 spectators who supported the 400 groups and 10,000 marchers that participated this year, the association said. Taiwanese Designers said they organized a team to march for Taiwan this year, joining politicians, government agencies, professionals and community organizations in showing support for LGBTQIA+ people and diverse communities. As the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex
MOTIVES QUESTIONED The PLA considers Xi’s policies toward Taiwan to be driven by personal considerations rather than military assessment, the Epoch Times reports Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) latest purge of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) leadership might have been prompted by the military’s opposition to plans of invading Taiwan, the Epoch Times said. The Chinese military opposes waging war against Taiwan by a large consensus, putting it at odds with Xi’s vision, the Falun Gong-affiliated daily said in a report on Thursday, citing anonymous sources with insight into the PLA’s inner workings. The opposition is not the opinion of a few generals, but a widely shared view among the PLA cadre, the Epoch Times cited them as saying. “Chinese forces know full well that
RSS