Experts have expressed mixed opinions on a bipartisan US Senate proposal to rename Taiwan’s de facto embassy in Washington, with some praising its symbolic significance, while others warned of potential risks amid rising cross-strait tensions.
The bill, introduced on Wednesday, seeks to rename the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) to the “Taiwan Representative Office” to better reflect “the reality” that it represents the people of Taiwan, according to its sponsors.
Republican US Senator John Curtis, who cosponsored the bill with Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley, said in a news release that the legislation “underscores the United States’ commitment to Taiwan’s democracy and enhances clarity in the US-Taiwan relationship.”
Photo: Taipei Times
In response to requests for comment, Global Taiwan Institute executive director Russell Hsiao (蕭良基) said there is hesitation within the policy community, and even among Taiwan supporters, to back what some view as symbolic gestures over more substantive measures.
“In my view, such criticisms are misplaced and symbolism has substance in the cross-strait context,” he said.
Meanwhile, Bonnie Glaser, director of the Indo-Pacific program at the German Marshall Fund, said that Taiwan should instead prioritize strengthening its defense and national security amid growing threats from China.
“I believe this is not the moment to focus on symbolic measures that could result in even more intense threats from Beijing,” she said.
Julian Ku (古舉倫), a Hofstra University law professor, said that while the bill enjoys broad congressional support, it may not be a legislative priority.
The proposal “seems more like a political issue related to what is going on in Congress right now, and my impression is that while there is broad support for a bill like this, it is just not very high on the agenda given all of the other priorities in Congress,” Ku said.
A name change does not require congressional approval — US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has the authority to approve it — but the timing remains uncertain amid upcoming US-China diplomatic engagements, Ku added.
Richard Bush, a Brookings Institution nonresident senior fellow, said that the final decision rests with US President Donald Trump.
While Rubio had previously introduced similar legislation as a senator, Bush said that his current role as secretary of state means the decision would ultimately be shaped by Trump’s broader China policy.
In 2023 and last year, similar bills were introduced in the US House and Senate, but failed to gain traction.
Curtis, then a House member, introduced one of the bills, while then-senator Rubio sponsored the other during former US president Joe Biden’s term.
Taiwan’s representative offices in countries with which it does not have diplomatic ties are typically named the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office or the Taipei Representative Office, in keeping with the host countries’ preference to avoid any references that would imply Taiwan is a separate country from China.
Since the severing of diplomatic ties between the US and Taiwan in 1979, Taiwan’s representative office in Washington has been referred to as TECRO.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS