Experts have expressed mixed opinions on a bipartisan US Senate proposal to rename Taiwan’s de facto embassy in Washington, with some praising its symbolic significance, while others warned of potential risks amid rising cross-strait tensions.
The bill, introduced on Wednesday, seeks to rename the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) to the “Taiwan Representative Office” to better reflect “the reality” that it represents the people of Taiwan, according to its sponsors.
Republican US Senator John Curtis, who cosponsored the bill with Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley, said in a news release that the legislation “underscores the United States’ commitment to Taiwan’s democracy and enhances clarity in the US-Taiwan relationship.”
Photo: Taipei Times
In response to requests for comment, Global Taiwan Institute executive director Russell Hsiao (蕭良基) said there is hesitation within the policy community, and even among Taiwan supporters, to back what some view as symbolic gestures over more substantive measures.
“In my view, such criticisms are misplaced and symbolism has substance in the cross-strait context,” he said.
Meanwhile, Bonnie Glaser, director of the Indo-Pacific program at the German Marshall Fund, said that Taiwan should instead prioritize strengthening its defense and national security amid growing threats from China.
“I believe this is not the moment to focus on symbolic measures that could result in even more intense threats from Beijing,” she said.
Julian Ku (古舉倫), a Hofstra University law professor, said that while the bill enjoys broad congressional support, it may not be a legislative priority.
The proposal “seems more like a political issue related to what is going on in Congress right now, and my impression is that while there is broad support for a bill like this, it is just not very high on the agenda given all of the other priorities in Congress,” Ku said.
A name change does not require congressional approval — US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has the authority to approve it — but the timing remains uncertain amid upcoming US-China diplomatic engagements, Ku added.
Richard Bush, a Brookings Institution nonresident senior fellow, said that the final decision rests with US President Donald Trump.
While Rubio had previously introduced similar legislation as a senator, Bush said that his current role as secretary of state means the decision would ultimately be shaped by Trump’s broader China policy.
In 2023 and last year, similar bills were introduced in the US House and Senate, but failed to gain traction.
Curtis, then a House member, introduced one of the bills, while then-senator Rubio sponsored the other during former US president Joe Biden’s term.
Taiwan’s representative offices in countries with which it does not have diplomatic ties are typically named the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office or the Taipei Representative Office, in keeping with the host countries’ preference to avoid any references that would imply Taiwan is a separate country from China.
Since the severing of diplomatic ties between the US and Taiwan in 1979, Taiwan’s representative office in Washington has been referred to as TECRO.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS