The Judicial Yuan should first communicate with the public how artificial intelligence (AI) would assist judges in writing rulings, and what measures it would take to avoid erroneous and biased judgements, before using it in the legal system, legal professionals and legal justice advocates said yesterday.
Representatives from several groups, including the Taiwan Bar Association and Judicial Reform Foundation, have expressed concern after the judicial branch last month announced that it would begin using generative AI to draft rulings on cases involving fraud, money laundering or unsafe driving once it completes a system test this week.
The Judicial Yuan also plans to expand the use of AI in drafting rulings on civil lawsuits involving compensation for damage caused by traffic accidents and debt cancelations and liquidation.
Photo: Chen Yu-fu, Taipei Times
It said the AI system that it would use is “specifically trained to produce drafts for rulings,” rather than being merely a draft generator, adding that the system is “a smart tool that can generate content using corresponding indictments and instantly analyze criminal facts and evidence in them.”
“The system would transform the way judges compose rulings. However, the Judicial Yuan still has many unanswered questions about this major policy change,” the groups said yesterday.
The Judicial Yuan last week said the system was trained using a large number of indictments and court rulings, but it did not indicate the time range from which legal documents were gathered for the training, they said.
The system’s alleged ability to instantly analyze criminal facts and evidence to produce drafts is questionable if it simply generates content for draft rulings from court judgements and indictments and not from relevant files in the cases as well, the groups said.
The Judicial Yuan also failed to explain how a third-party contractor built the database to train the AI system, and whether the data were stored and managed by the contractor or by the Judicial Yuan, they said.
The public has the right to know how the contractor avoids problems caused by inadequate or biased information in the database when tweaking the parameters of the AI system, and how the Judicial Yuan and the contractor would settle liability issues whenever there are disputes, they said.
Although the Judicial Yuan defended the use of AI in the justice system, saying that judges have the ultimate authority to determine the facts, apply the law and sentence in each case, the system might not accurately record changes to the generative content, they said.
“To dismiss the public’s doubts, the Judicial Yuan should offer further explanations on whether judges still have a final say on the factors leading to their judgements, as well as other issues,” they said.
Attorneys, prosecutors and other stakeholders should be allowed to try to access the database that is used to train the AI system, they said, adding that this would allow the public to jointly examine the bias and risks that might exist in the database.
Although AI has been used in other countries to help compile evidence in legal cases, with the quality of the work under strict scrutiny, it has yet to be used in the international community to help judges draft rulings and assist them in making decisions, the groups said.
A Purdue University study showed that 40 percent of people would not be able to detect errors in AI content that has an accuracy rate of less than 50 percent, a phenomenon that has been identified as “artificial hallucination,” the groups said.
“The AI system creates draft rulings after judges click on whether defendants entered a plea deal and which laws were used to rule on the case. While the judges issue rulings, the reasons leading to the rulings are generated by AI, which might contain errors that cannot be detected by users. The Judicial Yuan did not explain how such risks could be avoided,” the groups said.
Meanwhile, technology experts have warned that the extensive use of AI in the US justice system, particularly in helping judges in sentencing based on risks of defendants becoming repeated offenders, might reinforce the prejudice and racial inequality that already exist in the justice system, the groups said.
Using AI to help judges in their rulings could cause them to overlook cultural factors, situations facing the stakeholders and their intent, which are crucial factors for judges to consider when reaching a decision and cannot be reproduced by AI, the groups said.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on
RSS