The Judicial Yuan should first communicate with the public how artificial intelligence (AI) would assist judges in writing rulings, and what measures it would take to avoid erroneous and biased judgements, before using it in the legal system, legal professionals and legal justice advocates said yesterday.
Representatives from several groups, including the Taiwan Bar Association and Judicial Reform Foundation, have expressed concern after the judicial branch last month announced that it would begin using generative AI to draft rulings on cases involving fraud, money laundering or unsafe driving once it completes a system test this week.
The Judicial Yuan also plans to expand the use of AI in drafting rulings on civil lawsuits involving compensation for damage caused by traffic accidents and debt cancelations and liquidation.
Photo: Chen Yu-fu, Taipei Times
It said the AI system that it would use is “specifically trained to produce drafts for rulings,” rather than being merely a draft generator, adding that the system is “a smart tool that can generate content using corresponding indictments and instantly analyze criminal facts and evidence in them.”
“The system would transform the way judges compose rulings. However, the Judicial Yuan still has many unanswered questions about this major policy change,” the groups said yesterday.
The Judicial Yuan last week said the system was trained using a large number of indictments and court rulings, but it did not indicate the time range from which legal documents were gathered for the training, they said.
The system’s alleged ability to instantly analyze criminal facts and evidence to produce drafts is questionable if it simply generates content for draft rulings from court judgements and indictments and not from relevant files in the cases as well, the groups said.
The Judicial Yuan also failed to explain how a third-party contractor built the database to train the AI system, and whether the data were stored and managed by the contractor or by the Judicial Yuan, they said.
The public has the right to know how the contractor avoids problems caused by inadequate or biased information in the database when tweaking the parameters of the AI system, and how the Judicial Yuan and the contractor would settle liability issues whenever there are disputes, they said.
Although the Judicial Yuan defended the use of AI in the justice system, saying that judges have the ultimate authority to determine the facts, apply the law and sentence in each case, the system might not accurately record changes to the generative content, they said.
“To dismiss the public’s doubts, the Judicial Yuan should offer further explanations on whether judges still have a final say on the factors leading to their judgements, as well as other issues,” they said.
Attorneys, prosecutors and other stakeholders should be allowed to try to access the database that is used to train the AI system, they said, adding that this would allow the public to jointly examine the bias and risks that might exist in the database.
Although AI has been used in other countries to help compile evidence in legal cases, with the quality of the work under strict scrutiny, it has yet to be used in the international community to help judges draft rulings and assist them in making decisions, the groups said.
A Purdue University study showed that 40 percent of people would not be able to detect errors in AI content that has an accuracy rate of less than 50 percent, a phenomenon that has been identified as “artificial hallucination,” the groups said.
“The AI system creates draft rulings after judges click on whether defendants entered a plea deal and which laws were used to rule on the case. While the judges issue rulings, the reasons leading to the rulings are generated by AI, which might contain errors that cannot be detected by users. The Judicial Yuan did not explain how such risks could be avoided,” the groups said.
Meanwhile, technology experts have warned that the extensive use of AI in the US justice system, particularly in helping judges in sentencing based on risks of defendants becoming repeated offenders, might reinforce the prejudice and racial inequality that already exist in the justice system, the groups said.
Using AI to help judges in their rulings could cause them to overlook cultural factors, situations facing the stakeholders and their intent, which are crucial factors for judges to consider when reaching a decision and cannot be reproduced by AI, the groups said.
China has reserved offshore airspace in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea from March 27 to May 6, issuing alerts usually used to warn of military exercises, although no such exercises have been announced, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported yesterday. Reserving such a large area for 40 days without explanation is an “unusual step,” as military exercises normally only last a few days, the paper said. These alerts, known as Notice to Air Missions (Notams), “are intended to inform pilots and aviation authorities of temporary airspace hazards or restrictions,” the article said. The airspace reserved in the alert is
NAMING SPAT: The foreign ministry called on Denmark to propose an acceptable solution to the erroneous nationality used for Taiwanese on residence permits Taiwan has revoked some privileges for Danish diplomatic staff over a Danish permit that lists “Taiwan” as “China,” Eric Huang (黃鈞耀), head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Department of European Affairs, told a news conference in Taipei yesterday. Reporters asked Huang whether the Danish government had responded to the ministry’s request that it correct the nationality on Danish residence permits of Taiwanese, which has been listed as “China” since 2024. Taiwan’s representative office in Denmark continues to communicate with the Danish government, and the ministry has revoked some privileges previously granted to Danish representatives in Taiwan and would continue to review
More than 6,000 Taiwanese students have participated in exchange programs in China over the past two years, despite the Mainland Affairs Council’s (MAC) “orange light” travel advisory, government records showed. The MAC’s publicly available registry showed that Taiwanese college and university students who went on exchange programs across the Strait numbered 3,592 and 2,966 people respectively. The National Immigration Agency data revealed that 2,296 and 2,551 Chinese students visited Taiwan for study in the same two years. A review of the Web sites of publicly-run universities and colleges showed that Taiwanese higher education institutions continued to recruit students for Chinese educational programs without
A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill to enhance cooperation with Taiwan on drone development and to reduce reliance on supply chains linked to China. The proposed Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026 was introduced by Republican US senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis, and Democratic US senators Jeff Merkley and Andy Kim. The legislation seeks to ease constraints on Taiwan-US cooperation in uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), including dependence on China-sourced components, limited access to capital and regulatory barriers under US export controls, a news release issued by Cruz on Wednesday said. The bill would establish a "Blue UAS
RSS