The Executive Yuan’s Consumer Protection Office yesterday said that an inspection found that 11 out of 15 hand sanitizer products, as well as four out of 11 Internet advertisements, failed to meet standards.
The office launched the inspection over reports that some hand wash solutions with alcohol content contained methanol and had caused some users to faint, develop permanent blindness or have epileptic seizures, office senior consumer ombudsman Wang Te-ming (王德明) said.
The inspection covered all solutions sold at brick-and-mortar stores and e-commerce sites in May and June, he said.
Office secretary Ko Meng-chun (柯孟君) said that eight out of 15 products were found to contravene the Commodity Labeling Act (商品標示法) for failing to provide detailed label information in Chinese about the manufacturer, the manufacturing date and some of the core ingredients.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Central Region Office has asked local governments to notify the companies in breach of the act to correct the labeling within a certain period or face fines of NT$20,000 to NT$200,000 (US$678 to US$6,776) until they comply with the law, Ko said.
Only two of the products specified on their labeling that they were intended for medical use, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) technical specialist Syu Jhih-yu (許芷瑀) said.
The other 13 contravened Article 69 of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (藥事法) for using words such as “disinfect” or “kills germs” on their labeling, which is punishable by fines of NT$600,000 to NT$25 million, Syu said.
The offending products have been confiscated and disposed of, she added.
According to Article 6 of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, products marketed as having the ability to kill germs or viruses, or cure or prevent diseases, are categorized as having a “curative effect,” which in effect makes them “drugs,” which must undergo clinical trials and be approved by the FDA, Syu said.
However, sanitizers marketed as “bacteriostatic” or “antimicrobial” are not considered mislabeled by the FDA, she said.
They fall under the jurisdiction of the Fair Trade Commission or the Ministry of Economic Affairs, which can require companies selling such products to provide documented laboratory test results, she added.
Of the 11 advertisements inspected by the office, four failed to meet standards, Environmental Protection Administration Department of Toxic and Chemical Substances Division Deputy Director Chen Shu-ling (陳淑玲) said.
The Japanese-made “Wonderful Spray” was fined NT$60,000 and its advertisements were removed from the Internet for contravening the Environmental Agents Control Act (環境用藥管理法).
Wang urged consumers to check the labeling of products before buying them and not to purchase products with smudged labeling or unclear description of products.
Additional reporting by Sean Lin
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS