Judicial reform advocates yesterday protested the legislature’s exclusion from its extraordinary session agenda of a bill to implement a jury system, while including a rival proposal for a lay judge system.
Members of the Judicial Reform Foundation and the Taiwan Jury Association were among the protesters outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei demanding a “twin track” solution, in which the government would test both systems for two to three years to determine which works best and garners the most public support.
“To have a jury system is to truly respect the wishes of the people in a democracy. Our government, in a push to include citizen participation in criminal prosecutions, should not reject a jury system to focus only on a lay judge system, which is favored by judges,” foundation chairman Lin Yung-sung (林永頌) said.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
“In doing so, the government and judiciary are depriving the citizens of their right to choose a jury system,” Lin added.
The Judicial Yuan’s bill for a lay judge system proposes three judges and six lay judges jointly presiding over criminal trials where defendants face more than 10 years in prison if convicted or are accused of intentional homicide.
Association founder Jerry Cheng (鄭文龍) said that professional judges would retain real authority and decisionmaking power under the system, calling the bill “fake judicial reform.”
The jury system is the mainstream judicial trial system in 52 nations, including the US and the UK, he said.
“It prevents miscarriages of justice, cuts down on corrupt judges taking bribes and curtails political interference in rulings,” Cheng said.
New Power Party caucus whip Chiu Hsien-chih (邱顯智) also attended the protest in support of a jury system.
“Granting citizens the right to participate in trials has been at the core of the judicial reform movement in the past two decades. However, the proposed bill as presented by the Judicial Yuan excludes the jury system,” he said.
“Is it because the Judicial Yuan does not want citizens to be involved in rulings? We do not want justice system officials to hijack our nation. It is wrong,” Chiu said.
Taiwan People’s Party caucus whip Lai Hsiang-ling (賴香伶) also endorsed the twin track solution.
“Judicial reform should not be political or a confrontation between ideologies. This issue should go to the public for discussion and to solicit opinions,” she said.
“Citizen participation in rulings is an important step in the judicial reform movement, so we believe the legislature should not deliberate on this bill at the extraordinary session. It should take it up during the regular legislative session,” she added.
Lin said that groups would hold sit-in protests and other actions throughout the extraordinary session, which is to end on July 22.
On Friday and Saturday, they are to hold evening rallies on a street next to the Legislative Yuan, and on Sunday, they are to march to the Presidential Office Building, Lin added.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
Taiwan is doing everything it can to prevent a military conflict with China, including building up asymmetric defense capabilities and fortifying public resilience, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said in a recent interview. “Everything we are doing is to prevent a conflict from happening, whether it is 2027 or before that or beyond that,” Hsiao told American podcaster Shawn Ryan of the Shawn Ryan Show. She was referring to a timeline cited by several US military and intelligence officials, who said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready to take military action against Taiwan