Liberty Times (LT): The Want Want-CNS deal is a merger bid worth about NT$70 billion [US$2.22 billion] and has highlighted the controversies associated with cross-media mergers and acquisitions, and media monopolization. Your decisions to withdraw from the review of the case because of accusations made by the [Chinese-language] ‘China Times’ have been praised as much as criticized. How do you feel about this?
Chen Jeng-chang (陳正倉): Having withdrawn from the case, I am supposed to refrain from commenting on the matter, but since the proposed bill is still under procedural review and not substantive review, I feel the need to provide clarification on the many public statements and misconceptions [pertaining to the case.]
We were all puzzled when the China Times made its accusations. At the time, the Want Want Group intended to take over both China Television Co and CtiTV and its proposal was unanimously approved by all seven NCC members, who also agreed to set seven conditions — including having the two TV stations establish independent teams — for the group to meet. However, of the seven NCC members, we were the only three to be targeted by the China Times, which groundlessly accused us of “illegal abuse of power” and “malfeasance.”
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
The takeover bid was approved with reservations based on the principles of opinion diversification and liberalization, and [because we believed that] mandating a news station and a business news station to found their own independent teams was a fairly reasonable request.
[Under normal circumstances,] operators who disagree [with administrative resolutions] are entitled to file an appeal, as allowed by the Administrative Appeal Act (行政訴願法), but the Want Want China Times Group chose to resort instead to using its media subsidiaries to pressure individual commissioners with lengthy critiques.
If we were to review the Want Want-CNS deal under such circumstances, [our] disapproval of the case could be misinterpreted as an act of retaliation, while an approval could also be seen as the result of succumbing to pressure. In this regard and driven by our desire to uphold the highest ethical standards, we resolved to withdraw from the case.
In order to ensure that the review could still be carried out properly by the remaining four NCC members, we closely studied the National Communications Commission Organic Law (國家通訊傳播委員會組織法) before opting to withdraw. [We found that] in practice, several past cases were actually reviewed and ratified by a group of four NCC members through closed-door meetings. Therefore, anyone concerned about the Want Want-CNS case could just look into those cases to gain a more thorough understanding.
Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲): Our withdrawal from the Want Want-CNS case was undertaken after thorough deliberation and aimed at ensuring an environment whereby the remainign four commissioners could review the case beyond reproach. Unfortunately, the Want Want Group continued to accuse us of abusing our power and even mobilized legislators to criticize us and the commission as a whole.
Want Want Group chairman Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明) had said in a public hearing on the case that “his attendance was a fight to defend his dignity.” However, don’t the NCC commissioners need to defend theirs?
With regard to the false accusations by the Want Want Group’s media subsidiaries, I maintained that [we should] press charges both to safeguard the commission’s reputation and to restrain the media from employing public apparatus as a tool to defame administrative agencies.
However, that proposal was rejected by the NCC’s then--chairman, who not only blocked our attempts to issue a press release on the -matter, but also handled the issue as if it was of interest to only some NCC members. Only then did I realize “how small an NCC member was” and I regret that the commission was not willing to stand up and defend its own reputation.
LT: Following your withdrawal from the case, the public has voiced concerns that the remaining four NCC members may choose to wrap up the review as quickly as possible. How can NCC members still fulfill their duties if most of them withdraw from pending cases due to name-calling, and when those under review can force members to recuse themselves simply by public name calling?
Weng: The Want Want-CNS case has given rise to several controversies, ignited a media battle between the Want Want China Times Group’s subsidiaries, such as the China Times, CTiTV and the -[Chinese-language] Apple Daily, and highlighted the long-standing problem of media concentration.
However, such a form of targeted defamation may not happen again, since not all media can be as overweening and monopolize the market to the same extent.
Chung Chi-hui (鐘起惠): Many countries have long paid close attention to the issue of media concentration as exemplified by the Want Want-CNS deal, yet Taiwan has yet to properly regulate the issue.
The same applies to cross--media mergers, which we have investigated and researched at length since joining the NCC four years ago.
We have repeatedly called for a draft version of a Cross-Media Merger Act (跨媒體法) to deal with the matter, but [we have yet to see] the NCC declaring its stance on such a key media-related issue. In this regard, both the NCC chairman and the NCC’s administrative system should be held accountable in light of recent accusations from academics, who have said the commission has been derelict in the execution of its duties.
LT: Will the review of the Want Want-CNS deal be completed before the end of the current term [in which current NCC members are scheduled to step down at the end of next month]?
Chen: I presided over a proposed bill that involved the bid to acquire cable TV provider Kbro Co by Fubon Financial chairman Daniel Tsai (蔡明忠) through a separate company [he established] called Da-fu Media. Examination of the case lasted two years because it involved the political funds of the Taipei City Government, [one of the major shareholders in Fubon.]
Despite giving a green light to the acquisition, we set several pioneering conditions [for Da-fu Media] — such as requiring it to operate its channels in a fair and equitable manner and to submit a timetable for its promotion of digital convergence, which aimed to make up for the deficiencies of existing laws and bring about policy innovation.
The “Da-fu case” could actually serve as a good point of reference for the Want Want-CNS deal, because if media concentration is an issue of great concern to all sectors of society, the commission should make an attempt to lower [the level of its] media monopoly [as we did on the Da-fu case.] However, the other four NCC members have yet to resume their review of the [Want Want-CNS] case, which [we assume] could be the result of certain concerns, or even worse — because of “certain people.”
Chung: As the NCC is an independent government agency, its members should be more committed to their roles. The four NCC members should have put forth more explicit regulations and standards to handle problems relating to media monopolies and cross-media mergers, but instead they have delayed reviewing the case.
The same applies to the draft version of the Cross-Media Merger Act, which should have been promulgated long ago, but no progress has been made yet.
Translated by Stacy Hsu, staff writer
Part two of this interview will be published tomorrow.
The manufacture of the remaining 28 M1A2T Abrams tanks Taiwan purchased from the US has recently been completed, and they are expected to be delivered within the next one to two months, a source said yesterday. The Ministry of National Defense is arranging cargo ships to transport the tanks to Taiwan as soon as possible, said the source, who is familiar with the matter. The estimated arrival time ranges from late this month to early next month, the source said. The 28 Abrams tanks make up the third and final batch of a total of 108 tanks, valued at about NT$40.5 billion
Travel agencies in Taiwan are working to secure alternative flights for travelers bound for New Zealand for the Lunar New Year holiday, as Air New Zealand workers are set to strike next week. The airline said that it has confirmed that the planned industrial action by its international wide-body cabin crew would go ahead on Thursday and Friday next week. While the Auckland-based carrier pledged to take reasonable measures to mitigate the impact of the workers’ strike, an Air New Zealand flight arriving at Taipei from Auckland on Thursday and another flight departing from Taipei for Auckland on Saturday would have to
A group from the Taiwanese Designers in Australia association yesterday represented Taiwan at the Midsumma Pride March in Melbourne. The march, held in the St. Kilda suburb, is the city’s largest LGBTQIA+ parade and the flagship event of the annual Midsumma Festival. It attracted more than 45,000 spectators who supported the 400 groups and 10,000 marchers that participated this year, the association said. Taiwanese Designers said they organized a team to march for Taiwan this year, joining politicians, government agencies, professionals and community organizations in showing support for LGBTQIA+ people and diverse communities. As the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex
MOTIVES QUESTIONED The PLA considers Xi’s policies toward Taiwan to be driven by personal considerations rather than military assessment, the Epoch Times reports Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) latest purge of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) leadership might have been prompted by the military’s opposition to plans of invading Taiwan, the Epoch Times said. The Chinese military opposes waging war against Taiwan by a large consensus, putting it at odds with Xi’s vision, the Falun Gong-affiliated daily said in a report on Thursday, citing anonymous sources with insight into the PLA’s inner workings. The opposition is not the opinion of a few generals, but a widely shared view among the PLA cadre, the Epoch Times cited them as saying. “Chinese forces know full well that
RSS