The Executive Yuan’s Committee of Appeal has upheld the Referendum Review Committee’s denial of a request from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to put the government’s planned economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China to a referendum.
If the DPP refuses to accept the decision, it could appeal to the Taipei High Administrative Court within two months.
Committee of Appeal chairman Chen Ter-shin (陳德新) refused to comment on the case yesterday, referring questions to the written decision posted on the commission’s Web site.
PHOTO: LIN CHENG-KUN, TAIPEI TIMES
DPP PROPOSAL
The DPP wants a referendum to ask the question: “Do you agree that the government should put the ECFA that Taiwan plans to sign with China to a referendum?”
The Referendum Review Committee turned down the petition by a vote of 13 to 4 with two abstentions on Aug. 27 last year.
The Committee of Appeal said it considered the rationale behind the Referendum Review Committee’s decision valid — that voters cannot express their approval or disapproval of the proposed ECFA because it lacks substantial content.
QUESTION OF CONTENT
“The substantive content of the ECFA will be decided by [ongoing cross-strait] negotiation,” the decision states.
“The content is still under deliberation and thus it is unclear. Given that, it is not a subject to ask people their opinions about,” the decision states.
In its appeal, the DPP objected to another reason given by the Referendum Review Committee — that the referendum subject did not fall under one of the four categories applicable for a national referendum: Referendum of laws, initiative of legislative principles, initiative or referendum of import policies, or referendum to amend the Constitution.
The DPP said in its appeal that the ECFA, which concerns the economic sovereignty of the country and major rights and obligations of the people, was a matter of initiative of legislative principles and a matter of important policies.
BIAS CLAIM
Saying that the question it asked was more concrete and clearer than the two previous referendums initiated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the DPP said the Referendum Review Committee had been prejudiced in making its decision.
The first KMT-initiated referendum referred to was held in January 2008 and asked voters if they would agree to authorize the legislature to investigate officials suspected of corruption.
The second one was held in March 2008 and asked voters if the nation should apply to return to the UN under the name “Republic of China” or any other practical and dignified title.
The Committee of Appeal also sided with the Referendum Review Committee on this point, saying there was no comparison between the DPP’s proposal and the previous referendum subjects.
An increase in Taiwanese boats using China-made automatic identification systems (AIS) could confuse coast guards patrolling waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast and become a loophole in the national security system, sources familiar with the matter said yesterday. Taiwan ADIZ, a Facebook page created by enthusiasts who monitor Chinese military activities in airspace and waters off Taiwan’s southwest coast, on Saturday identified what seemed to be a Chinese cargo container ship near Penghu County. The Coast Guard Administration went to the location after receiving the tip and found that it was a Taiwanese yacht, which had a Chinese AIS installed. Similar instances had also
GOOD DIPLOMACY: The KMT has maintained close contact with representative offices in Taiwan and had extended an invitation to Russia as well, the KMT said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would “appropriately handle” the fallout from an invitation it had extended to Russia’s representative to Taipei to attend its international banquet last month, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday. US and EU representatives in Taiwan boycotted the event, and only later agreed to attend after the KMT rescinded its invitation to the Russian representative. The KMT has maintained long-term close contact with all representative offices and embassies in Taiwan, and had extended the invitation as a practice of good diplomacy, Chu said. “Some EU countries have expressed their opinions of Russia, and the KMT respects that,” he
CHANGES: After-school tutoring periods, extracurricular activities during vacations or after-school study periods must not be used to teach new material, the ministry said The Ministry of Education yesterday announced new rules that would ban giving tests to most elementary and junior-high school students during morning study and afternoon rest periods. The amendments to regulations governing public education at elementary schools and junior high schools are to be implemented on Aug. 1. The revised rules stipulate that schools are forbidden to use after-school tutoring periods, extracurricular activities during summer or winter vacation or after-school study periods to teach new course material. In addition, schools would be prohibited from giving tests or exams to students in grades one to eight during morning study and afternoon break periods, the
AMENDMENT: Contact with certain individuals in China, Hong Kong and Macau must be reported, and failure to comply could result in a prison sentence, the proposal stated The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) yesterday voted against a proposed bill by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers that would require elected officials to seek approval before visiting China. DPP Legislator Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) proposed amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), stipulate that contact with certain individuals in China, Hong Kong and Macau should be reported, while failure to comply would be punishable by prison sentences of up to three years, alongside a fine of NT$10 million (US$309,041). Fifty-six voted with the TPP in opposition