Taipei City police officers have been manipulating the law and demanding payoffs from brothels and their patrons in the aftermath of vice raids, Taipei City councilors alleged yesterday.
New Party city councilors Lee Hsin (
Playing a tape recording of a conversation between a brothel patron and himself, Lee Hsin said that police offered to give the suspect a lighter criminal charge if he admitted to engaging in sex with the prostitute. The police then used the confession to put pressure on the brothel's operator.
The man, who spoke to Lee two days ago on condition of anonymity, was caught having sex with a call girl at a motel during a police raid on the night of Feb. 1.
"They told me that if I didn't want my family to know about it, I'd better admit that I had paid to have sex with her," the patron said. "If I cooperated, they would handle the case as an obscene act, which they said was not a big deal, although I would have to pay NT$6,000 as required by the law and tell them what I knew about the call service."
According to the Social Order Maintenance Law (
The employer or agent of the prostitute is also subject to having their water and electricity supplies at the `venue of operations' cut.
But if the two parties are caught engaging in obscene acts, each is subject to a NT$6,000 fine and are not submitted to the prosecutors.
"Most patrons prefer to pay the NT$6,000 rather than give testimony in court because they're either worried about their own reputation or afraid that their spouse might file a lawsuit," Lee said.
After the police obtained the information from the patron, Lee said, they then confronted the employer of the prostitute and demanded a certain amount of money be paid for the return of the prostitutes or face the termination of their water and electricity supplies, Lee said.
"My own investigation shows that it costs about NT$50,000 to get back a local prostitute and NT$80,000 for a foreign one," he said.
"Most employers prefer to pay the money because they do not want to see the operation of their business terminated," he said.
Chen Yi-feng (
"Prosecutors currently are investigating a similar case. The headquarters will not side with anyone who is in the wrong and will do everything in accordance with the law," he said.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
RSS