Following a barrage of interpretations over the past two weeks by local scholars over China's white paper on Taiwan, a former high-ranking defense official yesterday expressed regret that they failed to see the paper from a historical and military perspective.
"We have to know that if China wants to use force against Taiwan, it will simply do it. But it will not take the action until it has the situation under control," Vice Admiral (Ret.) Ko Tun-hwa (
Ko, one of a few former ROC servicemen who participated in the Allies' Normandy landing in WWII, previously headed the office of the deputy chief of the general staff for planning under the defense ministry, as well as the war college of the Armed Forces University.
"We also have to know that if the communists want to negotiate with you, they will first make you feel extremely uncomfortable by putting you in an unfavorable condition," Ko said.
"That is exactly the condition Taiwan is now faced with. The communists want Taiwan to follow their own rules for future negotiations between the two sides, despite being perhaps ready to make concessions. That's their negotiation strategy."
Citing the negotiations between China and the US before normalization of relations between the two countries, Ko said the communists took a hardline stance against US negotiators from the very beginning of bilateral talks.
"The two sides held over 100 rounds of talks between 1954 -- the year Taiwan signed a mutual defense treaty with the US -- and 1978, as the US prepared to switch diplomatic ties from Taipei to Beijing. The [Chinese] got what they wanted without letting the US know how eager they were to have (formal) relations," Ko said. "Declassified archives of those talks showed one of the negotiators, Hwang Hwa (
From a military perspective, Ko said, the harshly worded white paper could indicate an attempt by the Chinese to find out just how committed the US is to protecting Taiwan.
"When [Chinese] troops launched an intensive artillery attack against Taiwan's Kinmen islands in 1958, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) wanted to find out through the attack whether the US would help Taiwan defend itself," Ko said. "It took some time for the US to give an answer to the communists. The US sent a message to Mao through the British ambassador in Beijing that it would consider using nuclear weapons against military facilities on the mainland if the artillery attack was to drag on and expand.
"The Beijing leadership now plays a similar game with the US, seeking to find out what cards it has in its hand. Before Beijing could find out an answer, it would seek to solve the thorny Taiwan issue through another approach -- putting pressure on Taiwan to open talks on reunification."
Meanwhile, Chao Chien-min (
"The [Chinese] have the ability to launch an attrition and endurance war against Taiwan. They could extend the war to as long as eight years until Taiwan gives up," Chao said.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS