Australia will ban imports of disposable vapes from Jan. 1 next year, the government said on Nov. 28, slamming the devices as recreational products that children can become addicted to.
The block on single-use vapes is aimed at reversing a “disturbing” increase in vaping among young people, Australian Health Minister Mark Butler said.
Australia first revealed the import ban in May but had not given a start date until now.
Photo: AP 照片：美聯社
Vaping had been sold to governments as a tool to help long-term smokers quit, Butler said.
“It was not sold as a recreational product, especially not one targeted to our kids, but that is what it has become,” the minister said.
“The great majority of vapes contain nicotine, and children are becoming addicted.”
Photo: Reuters 照片：路透
About one in seven children aged 14-17 uses vapes, the government said in a statement.
It cited “consistent evidence” that young Australians who vape are about three times more likely to take up tobacco smoking.
Legislation will also be introduced next year to outlaw the manufacture, advertising or supply of disposable vapes in Australia, the government said.
The ban was hailed by the Australian Medical Association.
“Australia has been a world leader in reducing smoking rates and the subsequent health harms, so the government’s decisive action to stop vaping in its tracks and prevent further harm is very welcome,” said association president Steve Robson.
‘Dangerous gateway’
The government said it was also introducing a scheme to enable doctors and nurses to prescribe vapes “where clinically appropriate” from Jan. 1.
Australia has a long record of fighting smoking.
In 2012, it became the first country to introduce “plain packaging” laws for cigarettes — a policy since copied by France, Britain and others.
High taxes have pushed up the price of a packet to about Aus$50 (US$33).
For some people who would otherwise never have smoked, vaping is a “dangerous gateway” to tobacco, said Kim Caudwell, senior lecturer in psychology at Australia’s Charles Darwin University.
“So you can understand how at the population level, increased vaping and a resurgence of tobacco use will impact population health in the future.”
Neighboring New Zealand until recently stood alongside Australia at the forefront of the battle against smoking.
But its new conservative coalition government, which took power last month, has now promised to scrap a so-called “generational smoking ban” that would have stopped sales of tobacco to anyone born after 2008.
“I was absolutely shocked and appalled. It is one of the worst days I can remember for public health,” University of Otago tobacco control expert Richard Edwards told AFP.
“It is public health vandalism.”
(AFP)
澳洲政府11月28日表示，將自明年1月1日起禁止進口拋棄式電子煙，並抨擊說這種裝置是讓兒童上癮的消遣產品。
衛生部長馬克‧巴特勒表示，禁止拋棄式電子煙是為了要扭轉年輕人吸電子煙「令人不安」的成長趨勢。
澳洲先在五月公布了進口禁令，但直到現在才給出禁令生效之日期。
巴特勒說，電子煙賣給政府是用作幫助長期吸菸者戒菸的工具。
「它不是當作消遣產品來賣的，尤其不是要賣給我們的孩子，但已經變這樣了」，部長表示。
「絕大多數的電子煙都含有尼古丁，孩子們正在上癮」。
政府在聲明中表示，14至17歲的兒童大約有七分之一在吸電子煙。
它引用了「一致的證據」，顯示吸電子煙的澳洲年輕人，之後抽菸的可能性約為其他人的三倍。
政府表示，2024年還將推出立法，禁止在澳洲製造、廣告或供應拋棄式電子煙。
澳洲醫學協會對此進口禁令表示歡迎。
協會主席史提夫‧羅布森表示：「澳洲在降低吸菸率及其所造成之健康危害方面一直處於世界領先地位，因此政府制止電子煙並防止進一步危害的果斷行動是非常受歡迎的」。
「危險的門戶」
政府表示，它還推出了一項計畫，使醫生和護士能夠從1月1日起「在臨床適當的情況下」開立電子煙處方。
澳洲在打擊吸煙方面有著悠久的記錄。
2012年，它成為第一個引入香菸「素面包裝」〔又稱「全菸害警示包裝」〕法律的國家—這項政策後來被法國、英國和其他國家仿效。
所課的重稅，已將菸品的價格推高至每包約50澳元（33美元）。
澳洲查爾斯達爾文大學心理學高級講師金‧考德威爾表示，對於一些原本不吸菸的人來說，電子煙是通往菸草的「危險門戶」。
「因此，我們可以了解在人口層面上，電子煙的增加與菸草再度興起將會如何影響未來的人口健康」。
直到不久前，鄰國紐西蘭還跟澳洲一起站在對抗吸煙的最前線。
但是，上個月剛上台的紐西蘭保守派聯合政府現已承諾廢除所謂的「無菸世代」禁令，該政策禁止將菸草銷售給2008年以後出生的任何人。
「我感到非常震驚膽寒。這是我有記憶以來公共衛生最黑暗的日子之一」。奧塔哥大學菸草控制專家理查‧愛德華茲告訴法新社。
「這是對公共衛生的破壞行為」。
（台北時報林俐凱編譯）
Many consumers are guilty of filling drawers or closets with old laptops, cellphones, fitness trackers and other electronic devices once they are no longer needed. It’s hard to know where to recycle such items, or it seems costly and inconvenient to do so. The world generates millions of tons of electronic waste — also called e-waste — each year. According to the UN’s most recent estimate, people worldwide produced 62 million metric tons of e-waste in 2022, and only about 22 percent of it was properly recycled. The US’ Environmental Protection Agency estimates that less than a quarter of e-waste is
You’re sitting in class when a classmate asks to borrow a pencil. It seems like a small favor, so you agree without hesitation. The following week, the same classmate asks to share your notes. Later, they request help with a group project. You agree each time — after all, you helped out the first time — but before you know it, it has become automatic. This scenario demonstrates the “foot-in-the-door technique,” a psychological concept that shows how agreeing to small, acceptable demands makes it easier to accept larger ones later on. The name for this strategy comes from door-to-door
A: The four-day Tomb Sweeping Day long weekend begins Friday and will run until Monday. Are you going to sweep your ancestors’ tombs? B: I did in advance last weekend, so I can go to Kaohsiung to see the musical “The Phantom of the Opera.” A: Wow, is “Phantom” touring Taiwan again? It debuted in 1986, so this year marks the 40th anniversary of the show. B: And it’s not just touring Kaohsiung starting March 31, but also Taipei starting April 21 and Taichung starting May 26. A: “Phantom” is one of the world’s Four Major Musicals. I’ve seen all of them, except “Les
Dos & Don’ts — 想想看，這句話英語該怎麼說？ 1. 我們很早到達電影院。 ˇ We arrived at the theater very early. χ We arrived the theater very early. 註︰arrive 為不及物動詞，後面如果有受詞要用 at 或 in。例如：They arrived in Taipei yesterday.。一般大地方，如國家、省、大城市等前面用 in，凡小地方城鎮、學校等則用 at。 2. 開車半小時以後，我們到達了海灘。 ˇ After half an hour’s drive, we got to the beach. χ After half an hour’s drive, we got the beach. 註︰come, go, get（來、去、到達）某地時，在表示地點的名詞前面應該用 to，如 go to school, go to Taipei, come to Shanghai 等。如果這些動詞後面所跟的是 here, there, home 等副詞，則不用 to。 3. 明天我會回辦公室。 ˇ I will be back in the office tomorrow. χ I will be back to office tomorrow. 註︰to be back 一語裡的 back 是副詞，不是介詞，所以後面要用 at (the market) 或 in (the office)。 假如假期結束，要回學校上課了則可說： ? Kids will be back
RSS