Mon, Mar 02, 2026 page1

• US could shift focus to Indo-Pacific, researchers say

  • By Huang Ching-hsuan and William Hetherington / Staff reporter, with staff writer and CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed on Saturday in airstrikes on Iran carried out by the US and Israel, could allow Washington to shift its strategic focus to the Indo-Pacific region, a Taiwanese defense researcher said yesterday.

  The US and Israel on Saturday conducted coordinated strikes against Iran, reporting that Khamenei was killed in the attacks — a claim later confirmed by Iranian state media.

  Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲), director of the Defense Strategy and Resource Research Institute, part of the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said Washington’s strategic objective is not the Middle East itself, but to swiftly stabilize the region so it can redirect its primary strategic focus to the Indo-Pacific region and impose structural pressure on Beijing.

  

  Smoke rises following an explosion, after Israel and the US launched strikes in Tehran yesterday.

  Photo: West Asia News Agency via Reuters

  Su said that beyond pulling Iran’s “nuclear fangs,” Khamenei’s death raises the possibility of regime change, which could trigger a broader “reordering of the Middle Eastern order” with significant second and third-order effects for Beijing.

  “If US-Israeli military operations achieve substantial suppression of Iran, the regional security architecture would be reshaped,” he said. “For Beijing, this would mean simultaneous constraints on its energy security, diplomacy, military cooperation and strategic timelines.”

  With the Middle East stabilized, US “strategic freedom of action” would expand, enabling Washington to allocate more resources to the Indo-Pacific to counter China — effectively giving US President Donald Trump greater leverage in a scheduled summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), he said.

  A weakened Iran would deprive Beijing of a key Middle East partner in any anti-US alignment, Su said.

  “During previous periods of US retrenchment from the region, Beijing expanded its influence, with Iran serving both as a node to circumvent US sanctions and as a land corridor under the Belt and Road Initiative,” he said. “If Iran is effectively removed as a strategic lever, Beijing’s room for maneuver in the Middle East would shrink considerably.”

  Su added that Chinese-exported air defense systems — including the JY-10/26 radar series, Hongqi-7 and 9B surface-to-air missiles and the ‘Shennong Shield’ laser system — were shown to be ineffective, having been destroyed by US strikes during the campaign.

  Washington’s broader strategy follows three principles: lowering costs in secondary theaters, encouraging allies to strengthen their defense capabilities and concentrating resources on countering China, he said.

  For Beijing, the developments in Iran represent a geopolitical setback, while a strengthening democratic alignment could impose structural constraints on Chinese expansionism, Su said.

  Chang Wu-yue (張五岳), director of Tunghai University’s Center for Mainland China and Regional Development Research, said yesterday that a series of abrupt US actions — including the abduction of then Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the confirmed killing of Khamenei and prior US involvement in port operations linked to the Panama Canal — are indirectly aimed at countering China’s global influence.

  Venezuela and Iran are major oil-producing states with close ties to Beijing, he said.

  Separately, China had exercised significant influence over operations at the Panama Canal through a lease on two ports held by Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings, until Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino on Monday last week ordered the temporary occupation of the ports.

  Chang cautioned against assuming the US would apply similar precision strikes against China as it did against Venezuela and Iran.

  China’s possession of nuclear weapons and its distinct geopolitical position make the situations fundamentally different, he said.

  While Beijing is likely to draw lessons from recent events, US strikes on Iran should not be interpreted as a template for action against China.

  Some academics had previously suggested that Taiwan could become a bargaining chip in talks between Xi and Trump. However, Chang said there is no need for concern, adding that recent US actions indicate the likelihood of Washington abandoning support for Taiwan is diminishing.

  With a leaders’ meeting expected in early next month, time constraints and domestic pressures on both sides make sweeping agreements on trade or Taiwan unlikely, he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Magnitude 6.1 quake strikes off northeast coast

  • 2

    MOFA blasts Beijing after Zambia scraps RightsCon

  • 3

    Taiwan keep Thomas Cup hopes alive

  • 4

    Expert warns on China customs blockade

  • 5

    US scientist builds brain computer lab in Shenzhen