Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have proposed revising military laws to stipulate that any active-duty military personnel who express allegiance to the enemy could face two to seven years in prison, adding that soldiers’ loyalty to the nation means “no freedom of expression.”
In the past few years some military personnel have pledged allegiance to China through videos and documents, but it is not punishable under the law.
In its draft amendment to Article 24 of the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces (陸海空軍刑法), the Ministry of National Defense proposed only making actions that “harm the military’s interests” punishable, citing freedom of speech in its reasoning for the draft amendment.
Photo: Carlos Garcia Rawlins, REUTERS
DPP Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) yesterday said he found the ministry’s rationale “absurd.”
“Receiving money from the CCP to do its bidding is not freedom of speech and should be punished under the law,” he said.
Wang and DPP Legislator Wang Yi-chuan (王義川), along with 14 others, proposed amending Article 24 to make pledging allegiance to the enemy through speech, actions, writings, drawing, recordings or any other means punishable by two to seven years in prison.
Those who plan to commit the offense would be punishable by one to five years in prison.
The proposal referenced a case from the end of 2023 when army Colonel Hsiang Te-en (向德恩) was accused of pledging allegiance to China and receiving payment from Chinese operatives to work as a spy.
Hsiang was recruited by retired lieutenant Shao Wei-chiang (邵維強), and allegedly signed a “pledge of surrender” and promised to “serve, as best he may, in his office for the benefits of the motherland in the event of war across the [Taiwan] Strait.”
The legislators said that incidents involving military personnel wearing their uniforms while waving Chinese flags or agreeing to surrender resulted in 10 people being convicted in February for contravening the National Security Act (國家安全法)
Regardless of whether the country is at war, their ranking or position, military personnel must be loyal to the country, protect the people and safeguard national security according to the Constitution and National Security Act, the legislators said in their proposal.
In this regard, “there is no room for freedom of speech [for soldiers],” they said.
Soldiers who surrender without resisting or express loyalty to the enemy fail in their duty to protect the country, they said.
Even having doubts about loyalty to the nation is grounds for deeming soldiers unfit for service, they added.
Commenting on the ministry’s proposal, lawyer Yang Chung-ting (楊仲庭) said that requiring proof that actions harm military interests makes the evidentiary threshold for punishing disloyalty too high, effectively making it a “toothless tiger.”
If military personnel pledge allegiance to the enemy, it harms the military and the political environment, making people doubt the military’s strength and determination, and impacting their will to resist a foreign hostile force, he said.
The ministry’s proposed amendment and explanation about soldiers’ freedom of speech risks misunderstanding this freedom, he added.
“Soldiers never had so-called freedom of speech,” Institute for National Defense and Security Research researcher Shen Ming-shih (沈明室) said.
Military personnel should be subject to regulations if they make statements that betray the country or affect national security, Shen said yesterday when reached for comment.
Many spies for China have only been sentenced to two or three years in prison, which is a low cost compared with the benefits from spying, he said.
The ministry and lawmakers should reach a consensus on the legislation so that this behavior can be prevented, he said.
Military trials are handled by common courts, where judges might lack sufficient understanding of national security cases, Shen said.
Strengthening legislation and clearly defining China as an enemy or foreign hostile force is necessary to effectively prevent infiltration, he said.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should
RSS