On Tuesday, the Legislative Yuan approved the longest session extension in its history, lasting a full two months. That decision was made without any explanation. While prolonging a legislative session is not uncommon, doing so without transparency raises serious concerns about motives and accountability.
Last year’s extension into mid-July had a clear and legitimate purpose. With the administration of President William Lai (賴清德) newly in office, the Legislative Yuan needed to receive and review the executive branch’s policy agenda. That extension was logical and necessary. It honored the principle of democratic transition and allowed the new government to present its vision. This year, no such justification has been offered. If lawmakers truly need more time to handle urgent legislation, why not call an extraordinary session — a constitutionally authorized mechanism that requires a defined agenda? Why resort to an open-ended extension that evades public scrutiny?
What makes the decision more troubling is that many of the lawmakers who backed the extension are the same ones who rarely show up for executive interpellation.
A report by Citizen Congress Watch showed that the 10 legislators with the lowest oral interpellation rates in the previous session all voted in favor of the extension. They were all affiliated with either the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
The two opposition parties hold a legislative majority, giving them control over key procedures and schedules. With that power comes the duty to lead responsibly and transparently. Yet the rationale behind this year’s extension remains vague at best. Many of the lawmakers involved have a track record of skipping oversight sessions. Their sudden enthusiasm for extending legislative time raises a fair question: Is this truly about productivity, or is it a political maneuver?
There is a misunderstanding that legislative recess equals vacation. In truth, it is a period free from daily committee and floor meetings, offering lawmakers valuable time for other essential duties. These include visits to local districts, policy discussions with academics and experts, consultations with civil society groups and drafting legislation.
A recess also provides a critical window for parliamentary diplomacy. As China increases pressure to marginalize Taiwan internationally, legislators must represent Taiwan abroad. Earlier this year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) led a cross-party delegation to the US to attend US President Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony. In February, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) received an award at France’s Future Leaders Invitation Program, where he met with experts in aerospace and strategic policy. These initiatives help bolster Taiwan’s international relationships and visibility. They require time and careful planning, both of which become harder under an extended session.
By arbitrarily prolonging the legislative calendar, lawmakers risk displacing these meaningful efforts and losing opportunities for outreach and engagement in their constituencies.
Taiwanese welcome lawmakers who are willing to work harder for the public good, but that work must be rooted in transparency and have a clear purpose. This year’s session extension has neither. Without a stated rationale, it appears more like a delay tactic than a genuine effort to serve the public.
If KMT and TPP legislators truly intend to act in the public’s interest, it must begin with honesty. Otherwise, this extension would be seen not as public service, but as political evasion. The public deserves better.
Gahon Chiang is a congressional staff member in the office of DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting, focusing on Taiwan’s national security policy.
Taiwan is home to thousands of foreign residents who build careers, families and lives here. However, what happens when one of those residents loses the ability to prove his identity — not because he has broken Taiwan’s laws, but because his own government refuses to renew his passport? That is the situation my husband, Matteo (not his real name), a Nicaraguan national, has found himself in. After about three years of attempts to renew his passport, our future in Taiwan remains uncertain. It all comes back to Taiwan’s giant geopolitical issue: the multitude of countries cutting diplomatic ties with Taiwan
The devastation in Tibet from flooding caused by a glacial collapse in the Himalayas was immediate and profound. Entire communities were left in shock, families were torn apart and countless lives were disrupted. That was followed by deafening silence from the Chinese authorities. No official tally of the missing, no acknowledgment of the dead — only a void filled with rumor, grief and suspicion. Disasters demand transparency. The first responsibility of the state is to inform its citizens of the scale of tragedy. By withholding that information, Beijing reduces Tibetan lives to abstractions, erasing their suffering from public record. The refusal to
A Taiwanese national studying overseas had, for a period of time, submitted regular opinion pieces to the Taipei Times commenting about Taiwanese politics and current affairs. These informed and well-written articles, demonstrating a profound love for the nation, were valuable because they represented a Taiwanese voice who had maintained a deep interest in what was happening in their home country, even as they pursued their studies abroad. For this reason, many were published on this page. Several months ago, this person contacted the Taipei Times and requested that the articles be unpublished. A member of their family was seeking employment
Well, sort of. Tomorrow is the seventy-fifth anniversary of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, signed by forty-nine nations on September 8, 1951. The Republic of China wasn’t one of them. Article 2(b) of the Treaty reads: “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” So, tomorrow would be the Diamond Jubilee of Formosa’s freedom from Japanese sovereignty. As my good friend and former Examination Yuan President Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文) voiced in these pages last year (“San Francisco treaty should be taught: adviser”, Sept. 7, 2025), the Japan peace treaty should be taught in all Taiwan schools to
RSS