Importance of definitions
With the indictment of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), political parties are scrambling to formulate responses. While they publicly express respect for the judicial process, each has its own agenda.
The truth is the impetus to corruption is part of human nature, unrelated to party affiliation. A political party is an organization formed by individuals who share similar political ideologies — it is not formed on the basis of similar natures or congeniality. To quote Song Dynasty poet Dai Fugu’s (戴復古) Jixing (寄興), “Gold is rarely pure and man never perfect.”
I often tell my students that when engaging in discussions or writing, they must understand the core definition of a topic and avoid losing focus. I like to use this story as an example:
An instructor teaching a course on “Life and Death” asked his students to reflect on the greatest loss they are currently experiencing. The students’ answers varied. One student said, “I have never had a girlfriend,” which prompted the instructor to correct him.
“If you never had one to begin with, how can that be considered a loss?”
That shows the importance of definitions.
As written in Chinese Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi’s (莊子) Cutting Open the Satchels (胠篋): “As long as sages exist, great robbers will not cease to appear.”
In conversation and debate, we often use our own strengths to attack others’ weaknesses. However, at the very least, we should ensure that the definition is well-established — otherwise, our words would be wasted and only make matters worse.
Is Ko’s case not just like that? He repeatedly said that the “blue” Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) and “green” Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “garbage” was indistinguishable, expressing disgust for the KMT’s black money connections and resentment toward the DPP’s rapid decline.
He said the TPP was a clean and pure political party. Many voters believed in him, devoutly following him as if he were some kind of god-like figure.
Now, Ko has fallen from his altar and shattered his own image. As for his young supporters who continue to follow him, perhaps it is time to reflect on their judgement.
Cheng Kuo-cheng
Taipei
The fate of TPP without Ko
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) wants to step down as party chairman, but the TPP refuses to acknowledge his resignation.
On Thursday, the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Ko on charges of corruption, embezzlement, breach of trust and other offenses, seeking a combined sentence of 28 years and six months.
The TPP held a press conference in response, calling the indictment political persecution.
TPP Central Committee member Lin Fu-nan (林富男) even went so far as to say that even if Ko submits a letter of resignation, the central committee would not accept it. Instead, they would wait for Ko’s return so that he could continue leading the party. There is no second choice for party chairman — they would only accept Ko, and there is no need to determine an acting chairman.
Since the TPP’s establishment — although it has the structure and setup of a formal organization — nearly all operational decisions have been made by Ko, leading to criticism that it is a “one-man party.” Now that prosecutors have indicted Ko on such serious charges and he has released a statement of resignation, the TPP is left clinging onto his leg, refusing to let him go. The party’s behavior only corroborates previous criticism — the TPP is indeed a one-man party.
The TPP harshly criticized the indictment, labeling it “political persecution,” but their argument is weak — they are avoiding what is important and dwelling on the trivial details for fear of losing support from Ko’s followers.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office dispatched seven prosecutors for the investigation and they had sorted through vast amounts of evidence — as many as 148 pieces of physical and documentary evidence, along with witness testimonies. The indictment spans almost 300 pages, with two large volumes of evidence lists containing purported proof of collusion with businesspeople and the close implication of interest exchanges.
How could that be considered “political persecution”? If the TPP continues to blindly support Ko — failing to consider alternative paths and lacking the power to forge its own — it is condemned to history.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the