The death penalty conforms with the Constitution, but should only be applied in “exceptional” cases, the Constitutional Court said yesterday.
The judgement was issued in response to a petition by prisoners on death row who said that capital punishment was unconstitutional.
“The death penalty is a capital punishment and its scope of application should still be limited to special and exceptional circumstances,” Chief Justice Hsu Tzong-li (許宗力) said during a lengthy readout of the court’s decision.
Photo: Ritchie B. Tongo, EPA-EFE
While the right to life is protected by the Constitution, “such protection is not absolute,” the court said in a statement.
“The court emphasized that because the death penalty is the most severe punishment and irreversible in nature, its application and procedural safeguards — from investigation to execution — should be reviewed under strict scrutiny,” it said in reference to the crime of murder.
However, “the judgement did not address the constitutionality of the death penalty in general or when imposed for other offenses,” such as treason or drug-related offenses, it said.
Imposing the death sentence is “prohibited” for “defendants with mental conditions, even if their mental conditions did not influence their offense in the cases in question,” the statement said.
Additionally, people on death row “should not be executed if they have a mental condition to an extent that impedes their competency for execution,” it said.
Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers yesterday affirmed the legality of capital punishment in the Criminal Code, adding that they would respect the court’s decision.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers criticized the ruling, saying “it effectively abolished capital punishment in Taiwan.”
The court’s decision runs contrary to the expectations of the majority of Taiwanese, they said.
Human rights advocates and groups opposed to capital punishment expressed disappointment with the Constitutional Court’s judgement, saying that government agencies had not pushed for a genuine decision on the issue.
“We shall keep up the fight. We hope that some day Taiwan will no longer have the death penalty,” they said in a statement.
“The Constitutional Court must be resolute in defending human rights by declaring the death penalty to be unconstitutional,” they said. “Then we can lead Taiwanese society forward to rise above hatred and using state violence as a deterrent.”
“It is time to break the cycle of taking lives and hatred to allow society to start the healing process,” the groups said. “It is unfortunate that the court did not do so.”
Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty director Lin Hsin-yi (林欣怡) said that the government has not taken a firm stance on capital punishment because of divided public opinion on the issue.
However, DPP members are mainly in favor of abolishment, but they did not make an unequivocal statement to clarify their stance, Lin said.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS