The Constitutional Court yesterday ruled that slander as a punishable crime is constitutional, but its scope should be better defined.
The court heard 31 petitions for constitutional interpretation, including 20 filed by judges who said that slander was not clearly defined in practice and was not in line with the principle of unambiguous law.
Writer Chang Ta-chun (張大春) and media personality Neil Peng (馮光遠) also filed for a constitutional interpretation of slander after they were found guilty by local courts, saying that the rulings infringed on their right to free speech.
Photo: Yang Kuo-wen, Taipei Times
Chang was ordered to pay NT$3,000 for defaming the late pundit Liu Chun-yao (劉駿耀) in 2014 after calling him “shameful,” while Peng was ordered to pay NT$5,000 to former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) in 2015.
Item 1, Article 309 of the Criminal Code states that a person who publicly insults another shall be sentenced to short-term imprisonment or a fine of not more than NT$9,0000. In practice, swear words and comments denigrating others as animals are common.
Meanwhile, Item 2, Article 309 states that a person who by violence commits an offense specified in the preceding paragraph shall be sentenced to imprisonment of not more than one year or a fine of not more than NT$15,000.
The Constitutional Court yesterday said that the law should not consider name-calling during arguments sufficient grounds to sustain defamation and that the environment, context, tone and reason for the argument should be taken into consideration.
The court said that whether one’s speech should be considered slander should be judged on how much it would affect the reputation of the person slandered, and whether said comments were conducive toward public affairs, literary matters or an expression of art, or positively contribute to academia or other professional domains, and whether, in isolated cases, one’s reputation should take precedence over one’s freedom of speech.
Only under such parameters would public slander not go against constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech, it added.
Following the Constitutional Court’s interpretation yesterday, lawyers said that it would significantly change the landscape of the judiciary and greatly reduce the number of defamation lawsuits.
During a debate at the Constitutional Court last year, Ministry of Justice representative Kuo Yung-fa (郭永發) said that Article 309 of the Criminal Code was established to uphold people’s reputations, which is considered a basic right guaranteed by the Constitution.
Peng said that his comments, while poignant and acerbic, should be taken as political commentary, adding that Article 309 does not offer protection for commentary that could fit the criteria for slander.
Taiwan’s Lee Chia-hao (李佳豪) on Sunday won a silver medal at the All England Open Badminton Championships in Birmingham, England, a career best. Lee, 25, took silver in the final of the men’s singles against world No. 1 Shi Yuqi (石宇奇) of China, who won 21-17, 21-19 in a tough match that lasted 51 minutes. After the match, the Taiwanese player, who ranks No. 22 in the world, said it felt unreal to be challenging an opponent of Shi’s caliber. “I had to be in peak form, and constantly switch my rhythm and tactics in order to score points effectively,” he said. Lee got
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday said it has lodged a protest with Pretoria after the name of the Taipei Liaison Office in South Africa was changed to the “Taipei Commercial Office” on the South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation’s (DIRCO) Web site. In October last year, the South African government asked Taiwan to relocate the Taipei Liaison Office, the nation’s de facto embassy, out of Pretoria. It later agreed to continue negotiating through official channels, but in January asked that the office be relocated by the end of this month. As of the middle of last month, DIRCO’s Web
RSS