The Constitutional Court yesterday ruled against decriminalizing defamation, but narrowed the scope of the crime to intentionally making a false statement and displaying gross negligence in verifying a statement’s truthfulness before dissemination.
Disseminating a false statement cannot be considered libel or slander if there was a reasonable effort to verify its truthfulness, the court’s abstract for Constitutional Judgement No. 8, 2023, says.
This means that the burden is on prosecutors to prove intent or negligence on the part of the defendant, it said.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
Defamation is defined by the Criminal Code as a reputationally injurious statement that is false or about a matter of no concern to the public, said Judicial Yuan President Hsu Tzong-li (許宗力), who also serves as the court’s presiding judge.
Information or evidence disseminated following a reasonable process of investigation and verification is exempt from defamation, even if untrue, he said.
The standard of tenability should be determined on an individual basis after weighing the right to reputation with the right to the freedom of speech, which are equally protected under the Constitution, he said.
When applied according to the above standards, the penalty for defamation does not contravene the constitutional principle of proportionality, he said, citing a precedent established by Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 509.
The court on March 14 heard the debate for Chu Cheng-sheng (朱長生) et al versus the Judicial Yuan, which brought about the constitutional judgement.
The Judicial Yuan at the time said that the doctrine of legislative supremacy that grants precedence to the legislature’s authority to make laws over the courts should be applied to any conflict between the right to free speech and the right to reputation and privacy.
Individual liberties are sufficiently protected by the standards of actual malice and negligence established in Interpretation No. 509 and the due process of the criminal justice system, it said.
Defamation laws are widely utilized in other nations, and the right to protection against attacks on reputation needs to be upheld under current social conditions, it said.
The state has a justifiable interest to uphold democracy by punishing people who spread false statements about public matters to injure the reputation of others, National Taipei University professor of law Hsu Yu-an (徐育安) said.
The judgement, which excludes good-faith errors from punishment and targets those who intentionally spread falsehoods, is in keeping with the spirit of Interpretation No. 509 to limit state inference on speech, he said.
However, Hsu Chia-shin (許家馨), an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institutum Iurisprudentiae, said that empirical evidence has shown that Interpretation No. 509’s definition of reasonableness is not clear to law practitioners.
The knowledge of falsehood or willful blindness toward it should be the defining element of criminal defamation, she said.
Interpretation No. 509 needs to be expanded to reconcile different opinions about the standard for the crime of defamation, National Human Rights Commission member Kao Yung-cheng (高涌誠) said.
The CIA has a message for Chinese government officials worried about their place in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) government: Come work with us. The agency released two Mandarin-language videos on social media on Thursday inviting disgruntled officials to contact the CIA. The recruitment videos posted on YouTube and X racked up more than 5 million views combined in their first day. The outreach comes as CIA Director John Ratcliffe has vowed to boost the agency’s use of intelligence from human sources and its focus on China, which has recently targeted US officials with its own espionage operations. The videos are “aimed at
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
SHIFT: Taiwan’s better-than-expected first-quarter GDP and signs of weakness in the US have driven global capital back to emerging markets, the central bank head said The central bank yesterday blamed market speculation for the steep rise in the local currency, and urged exporters and financial institutions to stay calm and stop panic sell-offs to avoid hurting their own profitability. The nation’s top monetary policymaker said that it would step in, if necessary, to maintain order and stability in the foreign exchange market. The remarks came as the NT dollar yesterday closed up NT$0.919 to NT$30.145 against the US dollar in Taipei trading, after rising as high as NT$29.59 in intraday trading. The local currency has surged 5.85 percent against the greenback over the past two sessions, central
RSS