In a sudden policy reversal, the government on Thursday said it would allow same-sex couples with one Taiwanese and one foreign national to register their marriage even if the foreign partner is from a jurisdiction that does not recognize same-sex unions.
In a directive to all local governments, the Ministry of the Interior said a previous practice that excluded such couples was discriminatory against them and contradicted the law on which same-sex marriage is based.
Taiwan in May 2019 became the first country in East Asia to legalize same-sex marriage following the enactment of the Act for Implementation of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 748 (司法院釋字第748號解釋施行法).
Photo courtesy of TAPCPR
Over the past four years, however, same-sex couples that include one partner from a country or region that does not recognize same-sex marriage have been barred from officially tying the knot in Taiwan. Household registration offices across the country have rejected applications for marriage registration by such couples based on a directive issued by the ministry in July 2019.
The directive cited Article 46 of the Act Governing the Choice of Law in Civil Matters Involving Foreign Elements (涉外民事法律適用法), which stipulates that the formation of a marriage is governed by the foreign partner’s home country.
Affected cross-national same-sex couples have challenged the rule, mostly with the pro bono support of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights, by suing household registration offices that rejected their marriage registrations.
Since March 2021, the Taipei High Administrative Court has ruled in favor of all five cross-national same-sex couples, involving partners from Hong Kong, Japan Malaysia, Macau and Singapore, who filed lawsuits over their rejected marriage registrations.
In three of those cases, the court overrode the ministry’s directive and instead based its ruling on Article 8 of the same act, which stipulates that the law of a foreign country shall not be applied if it results in “a violation of the public order or boni mores of the Republic of China.”
Despite those rulings, the ministry said they were isolated cases and that it was legally bound to continue rejecting the registration of marriages by certain cross-national same-sex couples in accordance with Article 46.
However, the ministry’s directive issued on Thursday, which took effect immediately, instructed household registration offices to adopt Article 8 instead of Article 46 when cross-national same-sex couples apply to register their union.
The ministry said the change in policy is in line with a decision at a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday last week, adding that it was made because the administrative court had made “consistent” judgements on the matter in several lawsuits.
However, the ministry said that the new rule would not apply to same-sex couples involving one partner from China, which does not recognize same-sex marriage, as cross-strait marriages are governed by separate laws.
Cross-strait rules stipulate that such same-sex couples would have to register their marriage in China before they can apply in Taiwan, it said.
In a statement on Thursday night, several rights groups, including the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights and the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, welcomed the ministry’s new rule, saying it demonstrates the Cabinet’s efforts to grant equal rights to the same-sex community.
However, they said it is regrettable that hurdles remain for same-sex couples involving a Chinese partner, adding that they would continue to urge the government to grant all same-sex couples equal rights.
The paramount chief of a volcanic island in Vanuatu yesterday said that he was “very impressed” by a UN court’s declaration that countries must tackle climate change. Vanuatu spearheaded the legal case at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, which on Wednesday ruled that countries have a duty to protect against the threat of a warming planet. “I’m very impressed,” George Bumseng, the top chief of the Pacific archipelago’s island of Ambrym, told reporters in the capital, Port Vila. “We have been waiting for this decision for a long time because we have been victims of this climate change for
MASSIVE LOSS: If the next recall votes also fail, it would signal that the administration of President William Lai would continue to face strong resistance within the legislature The results of recall votes yesterday dealt a blow to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) efforts to overturn the opposition-controlled legislature, as all 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers survived the recall bids. Backed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) DPP, civic groups led the recall drive, seeking to remove 31 out of 39 KMT lawmakers from the 113-seat legislature, in which the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) together hold a majority with 62 seats, while the DPP holds 51 seats. The scale of the recall elections was unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing similar votes on Aug. 23. For a
Taiwan must invest in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics to keep abreast of the next technological leap toward automation, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said at the luanch ceremony of Taiwan AI and Robots Alliance yesterday. The world is on the cusp of a new industrial revolution centered on AI and robotics, which would likely lead to a thorough transformation of human society, she told an event marking the establishment of a national AI and robotics alliance in Taipei. The arrival of the next industrial revolution could be a matter of years, she said. The pace of automation in the global economy can
All 24 lawmakers of the main opposition Chinese Nationalists Party (KMT) on Saturday survived historical nationwide recall elections, ensuring that the KMT along with Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers will maintain opposition control of the legislature. Recall votes against all 24 KMT lawmakers as well as Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) and KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) failed to pass, according to Central Election Commission (CEC) figures. In only six of the 24 recall votes did the ballots cast in favor of the recall even meet the threshold of 25 percent of eligible voters needed for the recall to pass,
RSS