Four initiatives challenging the government’s policies on energy, food safety, environmental protection and regulations governing referendums failed to pass yesterday in a national referendum characterized by a relatively low turnout and nearly identical vote margins on all four issues.
Under the Referendum Act (公民投票法), a referendum can only pass if an initiative is supported by at least one-quarter of all eligible voters, and the “yes” votes exceed the “no” votes. For yesterday’s vote, that meant an initiative could only pass if it garnered at least 4,956,367 “yes” votes and there were fewer “no” votes.
Referendum No. 17, proposed by nuclear power advocate Huang Shih-hsiu (黃士修), asked voters: “Do you agree that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be activated for commercial operations?”
The question garnered 4,262,451 votes against and 3,804,755 in favor, with a voter turnout rate of 41.09 percent.
Referendum No. 18 asked voters: "Do you agree to a total ban on the importation of pork and related products containing the beta agonist ractopamine?" It garnered 4,131,203 “no” votes and 3,936,554 “yes” votes, with a voter turnout rate of 41.09 percent.
Spearheaded by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Wei-chou (林為洲), the initiative was prompted by the government’s move to lift a ban on the importation of pork containing traces of ractopamine, even though Taiwanese hog farmers are banned from using the feed additive.
Photo: CNA
The lifting of the ban, which took effect on Jan. 1, was widely viewed as an effort to satisfy US prerequisites for any negotiations on a bilateral trade deal.
Asked about the vote, an official at the American Institute in Taiwan yesterday said: “We will continue to seek constructive engagement with Taiwan on issues that affect exports of US food and agricultural products.”
Referendum No. 19 asked: “Do you agree that referendums should be held alongside general elections if a referendum proposal is confirmed less than six months before a general election?”
Photo: CNA
The question received 4,120,038 “no” votes and 3,951,882 “yes” votes, with a voter turnout rate of 41.08 percent.
It was initiated by former KMT chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣).
Referendum No. 20, initiated by Rescue Datan’s Algal Reefs Alliance convener Pan Chong-cheng (潘忠政), asked: “Do you agree that Taiwan’s third liquefied natural gas [LNG] terminal should be relocated from its planned site on the coast of Datan, Taoyuan, and its adjacent waters?”
Photo: CNA
The question garnered 4,163,464 votes against and 3,901,171 in favor. It had a voter turnout rate of 41.09 percent.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had urged people to vote against all four questions, while the main opposition KMT supported a “yes” vote for all of them.
In response to the referendum results, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who is the DPP chairperson, last night said there were no winners or losers in the referendums and that the issues were questions about the nation’s direction.
The results show Taiwanese support opening up to the world, the nation’s energy transition, a balanced approach to environmental protection and economic development, and rational discourse on public policy, she told a news conference at the Presidential Office.
The initiatives were also expressions of dissent against the government’s agenda, which is normal in a democratic society, she said, adding that policymaking should accommodate for differences in opinion.
Democracy continues to be the strongest form of defense for Taiwan as the government looks to the challenges ahead, she said before thanking the public for casting ballots in the referendums.
Separately, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) expressed the party’s apologies over the outcome of the referendums.
The result is a victory for a new autocratic government in Taiwan that pretends to be a democracy, but is a defeat for civic groups and people who wish to deepen democracy in the nation, Chu told a news conference at KMT headquarters in Taipei.
The turnout reflected the support base on both sides, Chu said, adding that he had not tried hard enough to sway independent voters.
He would take responsibility as party chairman for failing to achieve the party’s goals, he said.
In response to some party members’ demands that the party discipline New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT for refusing to reveal his stance on the four initiatives, Chu said he shouldered the majority of the blame.
“The party must find more friends and not enemies,” he said.
The KMT would continue to push to improve democracy in Taiwan, he added.
Meanwhile, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in a statement blamed disinformation and trickery for the result.
Tsai mispresented the initiative on pork imports as a total rejection of US pork, while the relocation of the LNG terminal was distorted into a proposal to halt its construction, the TPP said.
The rejection of the initiatives is a negative turn in the nation’s democratization that indicates “the emergence of a giant green new authoritarian machine,” the party said, referring to the pan-green camp.
That none of the initiatives reached the legal threshold shows that people have punished political parties for sowing division and that the public was unresponsive to fear-mongering, it said.
The results should cause consternation in every political party in the nation, it added.
Inconvenient election mechanisms were another reason for the low turnout and lawmakers should create a law to allow absentee voting, it said.
Additional reporting by Chen Yun, CNA and Reuters
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s