China is mounting an increasingly sophisticated counterattack to criticism of its policies in the predominantly Muslim region of Xinjiang, courting foreign media and running opinion pieces abroad as it seeks to spin a more positive message.
Beijing has faced an outcry from activists, academics, foreign governments and UN rights experts over mass detentions and strict surveillance of the mostly Muslim Uighur minority and other Muslim groups who call Xinjiang home.
The US is looking at sanctions on senior Chinese officials and companies linked to allegations of human rights abuses there, which would further ratchet up tension amid their blistering trade war.
Photo: Reuters
China says Xinjiang faces a serious threat from Muslim militants and separatists, and has rejected all accusations of mistreatment in an area where hundreds have been killed in recent years in unrest between Uighurs and ethnic Han Chinese.
Officials say they are putting some people through “vocational” courses to rein in extremism, and have denounced hostile foreign forces for sowing misinformation.
In an opinion piece last week in the Jakarta Post entitled “Xinjiang, what a wonderful place,” Chinese Ambassador to Indonesia Xiao Qian (肖千) wrote that religious rights were respected and protected there and attacks were “anti-religion in nature.”
“But regrettably, a few institutions and people from the West pursue double standards, deliberately distorting the facts, speculating on the so-called ‘re-education camps’ and misrepresenting [the] Chinese government’s efforts to prevent religious extremism and promote deradicalization,” he wrote.
Chinese Ambassador to Britain Liu Xiaoming (劉曉明) has also written to the Financial Times and The Economist to defend Beijing’s policy on Xinjiang.
However, privately, China has not been so willing to discuss Xinjiang with foreign envoys, two diplomats who have attended meetings with Chinese officials said.
“They just shut you down,” one of the diplomats said.
Last month, the Chinese government invited a small group of foreign reporters to a briefing on the sidelines of a UN human rights meeting in Geneva to put its side of the story in unusually strong and outspoken terms.
Li Xiaojun (李曉軍), publicity director at the Bureau of Human Rights Affairs of the State Council Information Office, denied mistreating Muslims in Xinjiang and said China was trying to avoid the problems of radicalization that Europe had experienced.
“Look at Belgium, look at Paris, look at some other European countries,” Li said, referring to recent terror attacks in these locations blamed on Islamic extremists. “You have failed.”
Government officials at the Geneva event were accompanied by five Chinese academic experts, who all remained silent when asked if they had any criticism of China’s human rights record.
The five said they had not been to Xinjiang recently.
Asked how they knew about conditions there, Wang Xiaolin, a professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, said there were a lot of information channels, such as television broadcasts, social media and information shared by businesspeople, tourists and academics and friends who have traveled there.
It is hard to quantify whether anyone is paying attention to what China has been saying on Xinjiang. Xiao’s piece for the Jakarta Post was roasted by followers of the paper’s Facebook and Twitter pages as Chinese “propaganda.”
Asked about China’s efforts to tell its side of the story and whether its messaging had been effective, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the region was stable and prosperous, with no attacks for more than a year.
“On Xinjiang matters, the Chinese people have the most right to speak,” it said in a short statement sent to Reuters.
Foreign human rights groups and exiles have been unimpressed with China’s defense and held their own panel in Geneva.
“What we are seeing now in East Turkestan is more than just repression: It is an intentional campaign of assimilation by the Chinese government targeting the Uighur identity,” World Uyghur Congress president Dolkun Isa said, using the term the community employs to refer to Xinjiang.
China has sought to cast its security crackdown in resource-rich Xinjiang — strategically located on the borders of Afghanistan, central Asia, India and Pakistan — as part of the wider global “war on terror.”
All countries have a responsibility to protect their security and that of their citizens, Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Le Yucheng (樂玉成) told the Financial Times in an interview published last week, the transcript was released by the ministry.
“The Chinese government will not permit Xinjiang to become a second Syria, Libya or Iraq,” said Le, an increasingly influential voice in China’s diplomacy, who diplomatic sources in Beijing say is tipped as a possible future foreign minister.
“If upheaval in Xinjiang spreads outside the borders, it will affect the stability of central Asia and the Middle East, and maybe spread to Europe,” he said.
BUILDUP: US General Dan Caine said Chinese military maneuvers are not routine exercises, but instead are ‘rehearsals for a forced unification’ with Taiwan China poses an increasingly aggressive threat to the US and deterring Beijing is the Pentagon’s top regional priority amid its rapid military buildup and invasion drills near Taiwan, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Tuesday. “Our pacing threat is communist China,” Hegseth told the US House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense during an oversight hearing with US General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “Beijing is preparing for war in the Indo-Pacific as part of its broader strategy to dominate that region and then the world,” Hegseth said, adding that if it succeeds, it could derail
CHIP WAR: The new restrictions are expected to cut off China’s access to Taiwan’s technologies, materials and equipment essential to building AI semiconductors Taiwan has blacklisted Huawei Technologies Co (華為) and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯), dealing another major blow to the two companies spearheading China’s efforts to develop cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) chip technologies. The Ministry of Economic Affairs’ International Trade Administration has included Huawei, SMIC and several of their subsidiaries in an update of its so-called strategic high-tech commodities entity list, the latest version on its Web site showed on Saturday. It did not publicly announce the change. Other entities on the list include organizations such as the Taliban and al-Qaeda, as well as companies in China, Iran and elsewhere. Local companies need
CRITICISM: It is generally accepted that the Straits Forum is a CCP ‘united front’ platform, and anyone attending should maintain Taiwan’s dignity, the council said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) yesterday said it deeply regrets that former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) echoed the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China” principle and “united front” tactics by telling the Straits Forum that Taiwanese yearn for both sides of the Taiwan Strait to move toward “peace” and “integration.” The 17th annual Straits Forum yesterday opened in Xiamen, China, and while the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) local government heads were absent for the first time in 17 years, Ma attended the forum as “former KMT chairperson” and met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Wang
CROSS-STRAIT: The MAC said it barred the Chinese officials from attending an event, because they failed to provide guarantees that Taiwan would be treated with respect The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Friday night defended its decision to bar Chinese officials and tourism representatives from attending a tourism event in Taipei next month, citing the unsafe conditions for Taiwanese in China. The Taipei International Summer Travel Expo, organized by the Taiwan Tourism Exchange Association, is to run from July 18 to 21. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) on Friday said that representatives from China’s travel industry were excluded from the expo. The Democratic Progressive Party government is obstructing cross-strait tourism exchange in a vain attempt to ignore the mainstream support for peaceful development