The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled against the Ministry of Education in a case involving the ministry’s controversial “minor adjustments” to high-school curriculum guidelines.
The court said the ministry should make its information more transparent and complete for public perusal.
The “minor adjustments” made to the guidelines for history, civic and social studies, Chinese and geography in January last year sparked controversy, leading to protests by civic groups, high-school teachers and academics — who called the changes “de-Taiwanization and Sinicization” of the education system tailored to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) view of history — and prompted the Taiwan Association of Human Rights to bring the case to court.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
Examples of the contentious changes to the history curriculum included revising the term “Japanese-governed period” to “Japanese occupation period,” and naming the period during which Koxinga, also known as Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), ruled Taiwan in the 17th century the “Ming Cheng period,” with “Ming” signifying China’s Ming Dynasty, despite the Ming not, in official terms, claiming sovereignty over the island, the groups said soon after the changes were announced.
The Taiwan Association of Human Rights filed an administrative lawsuit against the ministry in October last year after its administrative appeal, filed in March, was rejected.
The association said that even before the appeal, it had asked the ministry and the National Academy for Educational Research for information related to a resolution to adjust the curriculum, including a complete list of the review members, complete meeting minutes and ballot results.
The two agencies denied the request and simply offered abridged meeting records that “concealed key decisionmaking processes,” the association said.
According to Article 9 of the Freedom of Government Information Act (政府資訊公開法), individuals “may request government agencies to provide government information,” which means people have the right to request information related to the curriculum outline changes because it “is a national policy that concerns people’s rights to education,” it said.
“The Ministry of Education has repeatedly said that information about the changes should not be made public, which is brazenly against rights protected by the law and made us wonder whether its reluctance has something to do with its flawed decisionmaking process,” the association said.
The court’s ruling has safeguarded the public’s right to know and up held democracy, the association said, while calling on the ministry to immediately make public the information it has withheld and not appeal the ruling.
Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) yesterday said that the information was not entirely transparent due to concerns over the possibility that personal information could be leaked, adding that a new review process would be more thorough once put in place.
He said that the ruling would not affect the rollout of the curriculum adjustments this year, adding that the ministry would discuss with the National Academy for Educational Research about whether to file an appeal.
Additional reporting by Wu Po-hsuan
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
RIGHT DIRECTION: Taiwan’s efforts to prevent forced labor include a proposal to ‘fully prohibit’ employers from withholding workers’ documents, an official said Taiwan is to establish a mechanism to restrict imports of goods linked to forced labor, the Executive Yuan said yesterday, after the US proposed imposing additional tariffs on Taiwanese goods over labor concerns. “The Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Economic Affairs are to establish an interministerial review procedure,” Executive Yuan spokesperson Michelle Lee (李慧芝) said at a news briefing in Taipei. “The government is to use the Foreign Trade Act [貿易法] as the legal basis to restrict imports of goods produced with forced labor” and bring its supply chain governance more in line with international standards on human rights, resilience
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
RSS