The Supreme Court yesterday ordered a construction firm responsible for a building in Taipei that collapsed during the Sept. 21, 1999, earthquake to pay a total of NT$330 million (US$10.8 million) in damages to the building’s 170 residents, bringing a 15-year battle over compensation to a close.
The magnitude 7.3 earthquake caused 2,456 deaths nationwide, including 87 people in Taipei’s Tunghsing Building (東星大樓), which was at the corner of Bade Road and Hulin Street.
One hundred and seventy of the building’s residents filed a NT$2.8 billion civil lawsuit against its architect, Chang Tsung-hsin (張宗炘), now deceased; Hung Gu Construction (鴻固營造); Hsieh Lung-sheng (謝隆盛), the now-deceased former manager of original contractor Hung Cheng Construction (宏程建設), and the inheritor of his estate, Hsieh Wu Hsueh-hui (謝吳雪蕙); Hung Kuo Construction (宏國建設); and state-run First Bank.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
However, the claimants are unlikely to receive any payment, as the individual defendants are either deceased or out of the country, while the companies named in the case have cleared their assets, the lawyer for the plaintiffs said.
The collegiate bench said that based on reports by the Taiwan Professional Civil Engineers Association and the Executive Yuan’s Public Construction Commission, the building’s design was flawed, with the builders underestimating the weight per floor and the building’s total weight by 18 percent.
The horizontal force estimated in the event of seismic activity had been scaled down due to the miscalculations, so the number of reinforced concrete beams used per level was insufficient, the collegiate bench ruling report said.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The stress levels of the concrete beams were insufficient and the length of the stirrup hooks securing the steel-reinforced bars were substandard, the report read, adding that the connecting joints had not been reinforced with stirrup hooks or the reinforced areas were not secured tightly, causing the entire building to slowly collapse.
Cheng Wen-lung (鄭文龍), a lawyer who has represented the residents since 2003, yesterday said that the ruling was “merely a formality,” as the companies or individuals charged with paying compensation were either dead, had left the country or cleared their assets.
Cheng said his clients would not receive any money aside from a national compensation of NT$120 million that the residents had settled out of court with the Taipei City Government in 2007.
Although the collegiate bench concurred with previous rulings that Chang, Hsieh and construction overseer Hsu Mao-hsiung (徐茂雄) should pay damages, Chang and Hsieh are dead, leaving Hsieh Wu and Hsu to shoulder the payment.
The court upheld the ruling that Hung Gu Construction president Tu Ming-fu (杜明福) and board members Lin Hsieh Han-chien (林謝罕見) and Lin Hung-ming (林鴻明) need not pay damages, as they were not part of the construction team.
It also exonerated First Bank from any responsibility, saying that the repairs the bank was conducting at the time did not the affect the building’s structural integrity.
Tu reportedly left the country in 2012.
Hsu was sentenced to 18 months in prison for professional negligence.
Additional reporting by CNA
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s