The Supreme Court yesterday ordered a construction firm responsible for a building in Taipei that collapsed during the Sept. 21, 1999, earthquake to pay a total of NT$330 million (US$10.8 million) in damages to the building’s 170 residents, bringing a 15-year battle over compensation to a close.
The magnitude 7.3 earthquake caused 2,456 deaths nationwide, including 87 people in Taipei’s Tunghsing Building (東星大樓), which was at the corner of Bade Road and Hulin Street.
One hundred and seventy of the building’s residents filed a NT$2.8 billion civil lawsuit against its architect, Chang Tsung-hsin (張宗炘), now deceased; Hung Gu Construction (鴻固營造); Hsieh Lung-sheng (謝隆盛), the now-deceased former manager of original contractor Hung Cheng Construction (宏程建設), and the inheritor of his estate, Hsieh Wu Hsueh-hui (謝吳雪蕙); Hung Kuo Construction (宏國建設); and state-run First Bank.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
However, the claimants are unlikely to receive any payment, as the individual defendants are either deceased or out of the country, while the companies named in the case have cleared their assets, the lawyer for the plaintiffs said.
The collegiate bench said that based on reports by the Taiwan Professional Civil Engineers Association and the Executive Yuan’s Public Construction Commission, the building’s design was flawed, with the builders underestimating the weight per floor and the building’s total weight by 18 percent.
The horizontal force estimated in the event of seismic activity had been scaled down due to the miscalculations, so the number of reinforced concrete beams used per level was insufficient, the collegiate bench ruling report said.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The stress levels of the concrete beams were insufficient and the length of the stirrup hooks securing the steel-reinforced bars were substandard, the report read, adding that the connecting joints had not been reinforced with stirrup hooks or the reinforced areas were not secured tightly, causing the entire building to slowly collapse.
Cheng Wen-lung (鄭文龍), a lawyer who has represented the residents since 2003, yesterday said that the ruling was “merely a formality,” as the companies or individuals charged with paying compensation were either dead, had left the country or cleared their assets.
Cheng said his clients would not receive any money aside from a national compensation of NT$120 million that the residents had settled out of court with the Taipei City Government in 2007.
Although the collegiate bench concurred with previous rulings that Chang, Hsieh and construction overseer Hsu Mao-hsiung (徐茂雄) should pay damages, Chang and Hsieh are dead, leaving Hsieh Wu and Hsu to shoulder the payment.
The court upheld the ruling that Hung Gu Construction president Tu Ming-fu (杜明福) and board members Lin Hsieh Han-chien (林謝罕見) and Lin Hung-ming (林鴻明) need not pay damages, as they were not part of the construction team.
It also exonerated First Bank from any responsibility, saying that the repairs the bank was conducting at the time did not the affect the building’s structural integrity.
Tu reportedly left the country in 2012.
Hsu was sentenced to 18 months in prison for professional negligence.
Additional reporting by CNA
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s