Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) responded to legislators’ concerns over nuclear safety yesterday by saying that nuclear power plants in Taiwan were “much safer” than Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi because they used “fourth-generation” reactors.
Telling legislators the government would “humbly” review its disaster plans and make any necessary improvements, Wu said he was confident the geological environment in Taiwan and the structure of its nuclear power plants meant that the country was well prepared to withstand any natural catastrophe.
Regarding the safety of the three nuclear power plants in operation — Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in Shihmen District (石門), New Taipei City (新北市), Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Wanli (萬里), New Taipei City and Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Ma-anshan (馬鞍山), Pingtung County — Wu said all three were “much safer” than Fukushima Dai-ichi, which is the object of international concern following a series of explosions and a possible meltdown.
Asked by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator John Chiang (蔣孝嚴) whether the three nuclear plants were earthquake--resistant, Wu said: “That is difficult to say because even a country like Japan, which is more advanced than us, failed to avert disaster.”
“However, the Fukushima plant was equipped with a third--generation [reactor], while Taiwan’s nuclear power plants operate fourth-generation [sic] ones,” Wu said.
According to related literature, fourth-generation nuclear reactors are still being researched and will not be commercially operational for another two decades or so.
Contacted by the Taipei Times, Chung Ming-lien (鍾明廉), chief of public relations at Taipower Corp, which operates Taiwan’s nuclear plants, said there was no fourth--generation reactor in the country.
The Atomic Energy Council Web site shows the Jinshan power plant uses a BWR-4 (boiling water, second-generation) reactor; the Guosheng plant a BWR-6 (third-generation) reactor; the Ma-anshan plant a PWR (pressurized water, third-generation) reactor; and the No. 4 (Lungmen) will use an ABWR (advanced boiling water, also third-generation) reactor.
Units 2, 3, 4, and 5 at Fukushima Dai-ichi all have BWR-4 reactors similar to that at the Jinshan plant in Taiwan.
Wu also said the containment shells around reactors in Taiwan’s nuclear power plants were thicker than those used in Japan.
In addition, the three operational nuclear power plants in Taiwan were unlikely to be damaged by a tsunami because they were built at elevations of between 12m and 15m, Wu said.
Despite the fact that the No. 4 plant, which is currently under construction, is not located on elevated ground, the likelihood of a tsunami hitting it is also low because “Taiwan has only an outside chance of being hit by tsunamis,” the result of a deep-sea trench off the east coast, Wu said.
“The largest tsunami to ever hit Taiwan was a wave between 4m and 6m recorded in the Keelung area in 1867, while one in the 1900s caused a wave of less than 1m,” he said.
Wu also rallied behind Atomic Energy Council Deputy Minister Huang Tsing-tung (黃慶東), who came under criticism from anti-nuclear activists for drawing an analogy between nuclear power plants established on a consolidated-rock basin and a Buddhist sitting on a lotus platform on Monday to highlight their safety.
“Do you agree with Huang Tsing-tung? Are the nuclear power plants as safe as a Buddhist?” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Kuo Jung-tsung (郭榮宗) asked.
“This was not a groundless analogy,” Wu said.
Wu also said it would be “inappropriate” to fly the national flag at half-mast in sympathy with Japan, as no other country had done so.
“If everyone wears shorts to the swimming pool, but we chose to wear a suit, it would be extremely strange, wouldn’t it,” he said.
Taiwan would observe international protocol, which the Ministry of Foreign Affairs would look into, he said.
DPP Legislator Hsueh Ling (薛凌) said the country flew the national flag at half-mast following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the US.
Meanwhile, DPP lawmakers demanded that Wu order the suspension of construction at the No. 4 plant, a move Wu rejected.
Wu said that the government would make a thorough safety inspection of the plant before it goes into operation, which will now not be the end of this year as planned.
KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said halting construction of the plant was “a stupid idea” as it would cost the country large amounts of money for breach of contract.
Rather than halting construction, the government should support and develop systems off the coast to monitor undersea seismic movements to provide warnings of earthquakes and tsunamis, Lin said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY J. MICHAEL COLE AND VINCENT Y. CHAO
The Central Weather Administration (CWA) yesterday said it expected to issue a sea warning for Typhoon Fung-Wong tomorrow, which it said would possibly make landfall near central Taiwan. As of 2am yesterday, Fung-Wong was about 1,760km southeast of Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), Taiwan’s southernmost point, moving west-northwest at 26kph. It is forecast to reach Luzon in the northern Philippines by tomorrow, the CWA said. After entering the South China Sea, Typhoon Fung-Wong is likely to turn northward toward Taiwan, CWA forecaster Chang Chun-yao (張峻堯) said, adding that it would likely make landfall near central Taiwan. The CWA expects to issue a land
Taiwan’s exports soared to an all-time high of US$61.8 billion last month, surging 49.7 percent from a year earlier, as the global frenzy for artificial intelligence (AI) applications and new consumer electronics powered shipments of high-tech goods, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. It was the first time exports had exceeded the US$60 billion mark, fueled by the global boom in AI development that has significantly boosted Taiwanese companies across the international supply chain, Department of Statistics Director-General Beatrice Tsai (蔡美娜) told a media briefing. “There is a consensus among major AI players that the upcycle is still in its early stage,”
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
RSS