The Iranian opposition sought permission yesterday to hold a ceremony to mourn those killed in protests over last month’s election, in a new challenge to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
“We request permission to hold a ceremony to commemorate the 40th day after the deaths of our citizens who lost their lives following the start of the saddening events,” Ahmadinejad’s challengers Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi wrote in a letter to the Interior Minister Sadeq Mahsouli.
The ISNA news agency, which carried the letter, said the organizers planned to hold the ceremony in central Tehran’s Grand Mosalla, an open prayer venue.
PHOTO: AP
The Web site of Etemad Melli, the political party of Karroubi, said the ceremony was to be held on Thursday.
Authorities have banned such gatherings since the violence that followed Ahmadinejad’s hotly disputed re-election and have placed tight restrictions on foreign media.
In the immediate aftermath of the June 12 vote, hundreds of thousands of protesters poured onto Tehran streets, triggering the Islamic regime’s worst crisis since the 1979 revolution.
Reports say at least 20 people were killed and scores wounded.
“The ceremony will have no speeches. It will consist only of recitals from the Koran and participants will be asked to pay their respects in silence,” Mousavi and Karroubi said.
Their call came a day after the two joined reformist former president Mohammad Khatami in urging Iran’s clerics to intervene to prevent “oppression” by the authorities against detained protestors.
They accused the regime of “savagery” and said its “interrogation methods are a reminder of the dark era of the Shah,” Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution.
The reformist Etemad newspaper reported that two protestors have died in custody.
As Ahmadinejad’s opponents pressed on with their efforts to mobilize their supporters, the president faced continued fire from his own hardline supporters.
They accused him of defying supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by not sacking his pick for first vice president pick Esfandia Rahim Mashaie immediately after being ordered to do so by Khamenei on July 18.
The conservative Justice Seeking Students Movement urged the parliament to question Ahmadinejad on “why he was late in obeying the leader’s order and accepted [Rahim Mashaie’s] resignation instead of sacking him.”
“The appointment and [failure to] sack Mashaie is an unprecedented act in the history of the revolution,” the group said in a statement carried by ISNA.
The group also took strong issue with Ahmadinejad’s decision to appoint his close friend as chief staff just hours after he stepped down as first vice president, charging that that too was an act of defiance against Khamenei.
In his July 18 letter, the supreme leader told Ahmadinejad that Rahim Mashaie’s appointment would cause “division and frustration among your supporters.”
“It is necessary that the appointment be cancelled,” he said in the letter carried by state broadcast media.
The outspoken Rahim Mashaie had enraged hardliners last year by describing Iran as a “friend of the Israeli people.”
But he remains “one of Mr Ahmadinejad’s inner circle of trustees,” independent analyst Mohammad Saleh Sedghian said.
CROSS-STRAIT COLLABORATION: The new KMT chairwoman expressed interest in meeting the Chinese president from the start, but she’ll have to pay to get in Beijing allegedly agreed to let Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) around the Lunar New Year holiday next year on three conditions, including that the KMT block Taiwan’s arms purchases, a source said yesterday. Cheng has expressed interest in meeting Xi since she won the KMT’s chairmanship election in October. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a consensus on a meeting was allegedly reached after two KMT vice chairmen visited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in China last month. Beijing allegedly gave the KMT three conditions it had to
‘BALANCE OF POWER’: Hegseth said that the US did not want to ‘strangle’ China, but to ensure that none of Washington’s allies would be vulnerable to military aggression Washington has no intention of changing the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Saturday, adding that one of the US military’s main priorities is to deter China “through strength, not through confrontation.” Speaking at the annual Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, Hegseth outlined the US Department of Defense’s priorities under US President Donald Trump. “First, defending the US homeland and our hemisphere. Second, deterring China through strength, not confrontation. Third, increased burden sharing for us, allies and partners. And fourth, supercharging the US defense industrial base,” he said. US-China relations under
The Chien Feng IV (勁蜂, Mighty Hornet) loitering munition is on track to enter flight tests next month in connection with potential adoption by Taiwanese and US armed forces, a government source said yesterday. The kamikaze drone, which boasts a range of 1,000km, debuted at the Taipei Aerospace and Defense Technology Exhibition in September, the official said on condition of anonymity. The Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology and US-based Kratos Defense jointly developed the platform by leveraging the engine and airframe of the latter’s MQM-178 Firejet target drone, they said. The uncrewed aerial vehicle is designed to utilize an artificial intelligence computer
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus yesterday decided to shelve proposed legislation that would give elected officials full control over their stipends, saying it would wait for a consensus to be reached before acting. KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) last week proposed amendments to the Organic Act of the Legislative Yuan (立法院組織法) and the Regulations on Allowances for Elected Representatives and Subsidies for Village Chiefs (地方民意代表費用支給及村里長事務補助費補助條例), which would give legislators and councilors the freedom to use their allowances without providing invoices for reimbursement. The proposal immediately drew criticism, amid reports that several legislators face possible charges of embezzling fees intended to pay