US President George W. Bush called on Syria Sunday to hand over the Iraqi leaders his government believes it is sheltering. Speaking to reporters outside the White House, the president also repeated his belief that Syria possesses chemical weapons.
He did not explicitly threaten military action against the Damas-cus government, saying that "each situation will require a different response," but nor did he rule it out.
PHOTO: REUTERS
"First things first. We're in Iraq now," he said. "Syria just needs to cooperate with the United States and our coalition partners, not harbor any Baathists, any military officials, any people who need to be held to account."
The Syrian deputy ambassador in Washington, Imad Moustapha, denied that his country was harboring escaped Iraqis. He said it was the responsibility of US troops to monitor Iraq's border with Syria.
In Damascus, facing the accusations by US officials that it had weapons of mass destruction and was sheltering Iraqi leaders, Syria's president held talks yesterday with British and Saudi envoys while the Syrian Foreign Ministry flatly denied the American charges.
"Of course Syria has no chemical weapons. They [Americans] have been talking for years about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But so far, the presence of these weapons has not been confirmed," said Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Bouthayna Shaaban.
"I would like to say that there are biological, chemical and nuclear weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East region. They are in Israel, not in Syria," she said in a telephone interview with Lebanese TV.
The Pentagon's allegation that Saddam Hussein's lieutenants have been offered a haven by Damascus met with scepticism from some US intelligence officials last week. One said there was no "validated intelligence" for such a claim.
But the defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said there was "no question" that Syria was harboring senior Iraqi officials.
Asked how Washington would respond if Saddam himself were found being sheltered by Syria, Rumsfeld said, "The last thing I would do would be to discuss that."
But he said Damascus was "making a lot of bad mistakes, a lot of bad judgments in my view".
Rumsfeld said "busloads" of fighters had been crossing from Syria into Iraq to attack US troops.
"Some were stopped, the ones we could find we turned around and sent them back. Some we [put in] prisoner of war camps. And others are getting killed."
Top British officials said yesterday Washington and London had no plans to invade Syria, but Damascus had "important questions" to answer about its own weapons programs.
"As far as `Syria next on the list,' we made clear that it is not," Foreign Secretary Jack Straw told reporters in Bahrain, his first stop in a Gulf Arab tour that will also take him to Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
"There is no next list," he said.
In Jerusalem, Israel added to US pressure on Syria to change its ways yesterday, publicizing a list of demands that included the removal of Syrian-backed Hezbollah guerrillas from southern Lebanon.
"We have a long list of issues that we are thinking of demanding of the Syrians, and it is proper that it should be done through the Americans," Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz told Israel's Maariv daily.
"It starts from removing the Hezbollah threat from southern Lebanon," he said, calling for the dismantling of the group whose daily attacks on Israeli forces in a cross-border zone occupied since 1978 led to their withdrawal in 2000.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering