Efforts to forge a post-Taliban government progressed yesterday, as Northern Alliance commanders offered an exit to some non-Afghan fighters holed up with the Taliban in the northern city of Kunduz despite US opposition to any "negotiated surrender."
Germany said it offered to host an all-party conference on the future of Afghanistan and is awaiting a response from the UN, which is overseeing the international efforts.
Iranian state radio said the conference would take place in Berlin on Saturday.
UN envoy Francesc Vendrell "is very hopeful [about giving] a positive announcement" at a news conference later in the day, a spokesman said in Kabul.
Vendrell met late Monday with General Mohammad Qasim Fahim, the Alliance's defense minister, as well as foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah and interior minister Younis Qanooni in talks the spokesman described as "warm."
US planes pursued their raids on Kunduz and the Taliban's southern stronghold of Kandahar, the last two major pockets of Taliban resistance.
A Taliban commander said Monday that he was willing to surrender Kunduz under UN supervision, after weekend bombings killed more than 1,000 people.
The Alliance's General Mohammad Daoud said yesterday that foreign "mercenaries," except "those who have committed crimes," could be allowed to leave the besieged city if the UN or other countries accept them.
Estimates of Taliban troops defending Kunduz run as high as 30,000, with a hardcore element of Arab, Chechen and Pakistani al-Qaeda fighters making up about one-third.
Daoud said he rejected a Taliban request that they be taken by convoy from Kunduz to Kandahar, where talks between the Taliban and fellow Pashtun tribal leaders for a peaceful handover appeared deadlocked.
"Our holy war continues," a ranking Taliban official said yesterday at Spin Boldak, near the besieged city. "There are no negotiations going on in Kandahar."
Negotiators in Kabul were hoping to flesh out a plan for a post-Taliban government after an intensive round of political talks involving Northern Alliance president Burhanuddin Rabbani and envoys from the UN, the US and Britain.
Qanooni said an agreement was reached "in principle," but added: "On the details, we have some observations" that would be aired later yesterday.
US special envoy James Dobbins said he was confident a UN-backed meeting of eminent Afghans could take place this week.
An inter-Afghan conference at a neutral European venue would be the first step of a five-point UN plan for a broad-based new Afghan government.
The Alliance is "ready to move forward to the creation of a new, broader government, which will represent all regions, all ethnicities," Dobbins said.
After chasing the Taliban from the Afghan capital a week ago, the Northern Alliance had been hesitant about the UN plan, prompting concerns that it is unwilling to relinquish its hold on power.
The UN and US envoys had met earlier with exiled Afghan leaders, including former king Mohammed Zahir Shah, seen as a potential unifying force despite having spent the last 28 years in exile.
A spokesman for Zahir Shah, 87, warned in Rome that any attempt to sideline the ex-king would increase internal strife.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering