The calls came out of the sky -- a reminder of the caller's love, a warning they may never return. And then silence.
Sobbing, flight attendant CeeCee Lyles called her husband at home in Florida on her cell phone, said her aunt, Mareya Schneider.
"She called him and let him know how much she loved him and the boys," Schneider said. People screamed in the background, Lyles said "we've been hijacked" and the phone went dead, Schneider said.
The plane she was on crashed south of Pittsburgh.
The phone rang at Alice Hoglan's home just before dawn in San Francisco Tuesday morning. It was her son, Mark Bingham, on that same United Airlines jet.
"Hi Mom ... I love you very much," he told her. "I'm calling you from the plane. We've been taken over. There are three men that say they have a bomb."
Others called from passenger jets that later crashed into the Pentagon and New York's World Trade Center.
Barbara Olson twice called her husband and described details of the hijacking, including that the attackers used knife-like instruments.
"She called from the plane while it was being hijacked. I wish it wasn't so but it is," her husband said. The jet she was on struck the Pentagon.
In New York, a Colombian waiter working in the World Trade Center made a last phone call to his brother from the 103rd floor minutes before the building collapsed.
"We are trapped. They can't rescue us and it's all full of smoke," Wilder Gomez Piedrahita said in a call from a mobile phone.
"We are sitting tight and can't get out," the 38-year-old waiter said again and again.
Clemant Lewin, a banker, said he looked from his window across the street from the towers and saw people jumping from the 80th floor.
A man and woman held hands as they plunged to the pavement.
"I'm traumatized for life," Lewin said. "This was somebody's father, this was somebody's sister, somebody's mother."
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS