Faced with a highly polarized US political landscape, Leo XIV, the first American pope, has opted for discreet and indirect criticism while also keeping channels of communication open.
Since he was elected in May last year, the Chicago-born pontiff has taken a clear stand against some decisions by US President Donald Trump’s administration.
He has denounced the “inhuman” treatment of migrants, urged dialogue in Venezuela and lamented a “diplomacy of force.”
Photo: EPA
But, in recent weeks, Leo has favored restraint.
He has made no reference to a possible US intervention in Iran, nor to Trump’s designs on Greenland, nor to the volatile situation in Minneapolis after two protesters were shot by federal agents.
His weekly statements carefully avoid these subjects, while his Tuesday evening comments to the press outside his Castel Gandolfo country residence have become increasingly rare.
He briefly broke his silence on Sunday to voice “great concern” about rising tensions between Cuba and the US, calling on all sides to “avoid violence.”
“Leo is very cautious. He knows his voice is universal. As an American, he is somewhat the natural opponent of Trumpism,” a Vatican source said on condition of anonymity. “On the United States, he’s walking on eggshells.”
“He understands that the American Church is also targeted by ICE, people are afraid,” the source said, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency currently in the spotlight for its immigration crackdown.
The pope is operating in a context that is “hyper-polarized, where the Church is also targeted through the populations it helps, like migrants or the Hispanic community,” the source added.
BISHOPS ON THE FRONT LINE
But despite increasing concerns within the corridors of the Holy See at the Trump administration’s actions, the pope prefers to rely on the American Catholic hierarchy rather than wade into the fray himself.
“I think he thinks the first response should come from the country’s bishops themselves,” said Christopher White of Georgetown University in Washington and author of the book Pope Leo XIV: Inside the Conclave and the Dawn of a New Papacy.
Last week, Archbishop Paul Coakley, president of the US bishops’ conference, reacted forcefully to the “killing” of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, denouncing “failures in our society to respect the dignity of every human life.”
Bishop Anthony Taylor (Little Rock, Arkansas) pointed to “obvious parallels” between the US now and Nazi Germany, although he said that “Trump is no Hitler.”
“We are doomed to repeat failures of the past if we are not willing to remember them and learn from them,” he wrote.
The same approach applies on the international stage: in a joint statement, three leading cardinals — Blase Cupich (Chicago), Robert McElroy (Washington) and Joseph Tobin (Newark) — condemned America’s interventionist drift, the erosion of the multilateral framework and the risks to world peace.
‘REPUTATION’
At the end of December, the Vatican Secretary of State, Italian Cardinal Pietro Parolin, tried in vain to dissuade Washington from launching a military operation in Venezuela during a meeting with the US ambassador.
“The aim was to avoid a bloodbath and bring the actors back to reason,” a senior Vatican source said.
Invited to Trump’s new “Board of Peace” on Gaza, the Vatican is biding its time, saying it is “reflecting” on its response — another sign of an increasingly deliberate caution.
Leo has yet to meet Trump, although he received Vice President JD Vance two weeks after his election in May last year.
The challenge is to avoid exacerbating the divisions of an already split American Church and to prevent his words from being read through a partisan lens.
For the Vatican, the broader goal is “to prevent historians from writing in five, 10, or 20 years that the American Church was tied to Trumpism”, said Italian historian Massimo Faggioli, a professor at Trinity College Dublin and author of the book From God to Trump: Catholic Crisis and American Politics.
“The risk is a disintegration, even a collapse, of the reputation and historical role of the American Church,” he said.
For many centuries from the medieval to the early modern era, the island port of Hirado on the northwestern tip of Kyushu in Japan was the epicenter of piracy in East Asia. From bases in Hirado the notorious wokou (倭寇) terrorized Korea and China. They raided coastal towns, carrying off people into slavery and looting everything from grain to porcelain to bells in Buddhist temples. Kyushu itself operated a thriving trade with China in sulfur, a necessary ingredient of the gunpowder that powered militaries from Europe to Japan. Over time Hirado developed into a full service stop for pirates. Booty could
Jacques Poissant’s suffering stopped the day he asked his daughter if it would be “cowardly to ask to be helped to die.” The retired Canadian insurance adviser was 93, and “was wasting away” after a long battle with prostate cancer. “He no longer had any zest for life,” Josee Poissant said. Last year her mother made the same choice at 96 when she realized she would not be getting out of hospital. She died surrounded by her children and their partners listening to the music she loved. “She was at peace. She sang until she went to sleep.” Josee Poissant remembers it as a beautiful
Politically charged thriller One Battle After Another won six prizes, including best picture, at the British Academy Film Awards on Sunday, building momentum ahead of Hollywood’s Academy Awards next month. Blues-steeped vampire epic Sinners and gothic horror story Frankenstein won three awards each, while Shakespearean family tragedy Hamnet won two including best British film. One Battle After Another, Paul Thomas Anderson’s explosive film about a group of revolutionaries in chaotic conflict with the state, won awards for directing, adapted screenplay, cinematography and editing, as well as for Sean Penn’s supporting performance as an obsessed military officer. “This is very overwhelming and wonderful,” Anderson
Another moment of the US making permanent concessions for transient gains, which appears to be longstanding US policy with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), occurred last week when President Donald Trump announced that weapons sales to Taiwan would be delayed in order to arrange a meeting with the PRC dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). There were “concerns among some in the Trump administration that greenlighting the weapons deal would derail Trump’s coming visit to Beijing, according to US officials,” the Wall Street Journal reported. It attributed the suspension of the weapons sale to pressure from Xi. While some might shrug
RSS