Faced with a highly polarized US political landscape, Leo XIV, the first American pope, has opted for discreet and indirect criticism while also keeping channels of communication open.
Since he was elected in May last year, the Chicago-born pontiff has taken a clear stand against some decisions by US President Donald Trump’s administration.
He has denounced the “inhuman” treatment of migrants, urged dialogue in Venezuela and lamented a “diplomacy of force.”
Photo: EPA
But, in recent weeks, Leo has favored restraint.
He has made no reference to a possible US intervention in Iran, nor to Trump’s designs on Greenland, nor to the volatile situation in Minneapolis after two protesters were shot by federal agents.
His weekly statements carefully avoid these subjects, while his Tuesday evening comments to the press outside his Castel Gandolfo country residence have become increasingly rare.
He briefly broke his silence on Sunday to voice “great concern” about rising tensions between Cuba and the US, calling on all sides to “avoid violence.”
“Leo is very cautious. He knows his voice is universal. As an American, he is somewhat the natural opponent of Trumpism,” a Vatican source said on condition of anonymity. “On the United States, he’s walking on eggshells.”
“He understands that the American Church is also targeted by ICE, people are afraid,” the source said, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency currently in the spotlight for its immigration crackdown.
The pope is operating in a context that is “hyper-polarized, where the Church is also targeted through the populations it helps, like migrants or the Hispanic community,” the source added.
BISHOPS ON THE FRONT LINE
But despite increasing concerns within the corridors of the Holy See at the Trump administration’s actions, the pope prefers to rely on the American Catholic hierarchy rather than wade into the fray himself.
“I think he thinks the first response should come from the country’s bishops themselves,” said Christopher White of Georgetown University in Washington and author of the book Pope Leo XIV: Inside the Conclave and the Dawn of a New Papacy.
Last week, Archbishop Paul Coakley, president of the US bishops’ conference, reacted forcefully to the “killing” of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, denouncing “failures in our society to respect the dignity of every human life.”
Bishop Anthony Taylor (Little Rock, Arkansas) pointed to “obvious parallels” between the US now and Nazi Germany, although he said that “Trump is no Hitler.”
“We are doomed to repeat failures of the past if we are not willing to remember them and learn from them,” he wrote.
The same approach applies on the international stage: in a joint statement, three leading cardinals — Blase Cupich (Chicago), Robert McElroy (Washington) and Joseph Tobin (Newark) — condemned America’s interventionist drift, the erosion of the multilateral framework and the risks to world peace.
‘REPUTATION’
At the end of December, the Vatican Secretary of State, Italian Cardinal Pietro Parolin, tried in vain to dissuade Washington from launching a military operation in Venezuela during a meeting with the US ambassador.
“The aim was to avoid a bloodbath and bring the actors back to reason,” a senior Vatican source said.
Invited to Trump’s new “Board of Peace” on Gaza, the Vatican is biding its time, saying it is “reflecting” on its response — another sign of an increasingly deliberate caution.
Leo has yet to meet Trump, although he received Vice President JD Vance two weeks after his election in May last year.
The challenge is to avoid exacerbating the divisions of an already split American Church and to prevent his words from being read through a partisan lens.
For the Vatican, the broader goal is “to prevent historians from writing in five, 10, or 20 years that the American Church was tied to Trumpism”, said Italian historian Massimo Faggioli, a professor at Trinity College Dublin and author of the book From God to Trump: Catholic Crisis and American Politics.
“The risk is a disintegration, even a collapse, of the reputation and historical role of the American Church,” he said.
Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach. “Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward. Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday,
The Portuguese never established a presence on Taiwan, but they must have traded with the indigenous people because later traders reported that the locals referred to parts of deer using Portuguese words. What goods might the Portuguese have offered their indigenous trade partners? Among them must have been slaves, for the Portuguese dealt slaves across Asia. Though we often speak of “Portuguese” ships, imagining them as picturesque vessels manned by pointy-bearded Iberians, in Asia Portuguese shipping between local destinations was crewed by Asian seamen, with a handful of white or Eurasian officers. “Even the great carracks of 1,000-2,000 tons which plied
On Thursday, former Taipei mayor and founder of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison and had his civil rights suspended for six years over corruption, embezzlement and other charges. Seven others related to the case were also handed prison sentences, while two were found not guilty. It has been a bad week for the TPP. On Tuesday, prosecutors charged Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) with suspicion of taking part in Beijing-directed election interference. Xu has strong links to the TPP, which once offered her a party list legislator nomination. Tuesday also
Nuclear power is getting a second look in Southeast Asia as countries prepare to meet surging energy demand as they vie for artificial intelligence-focused data centers. Several Southeast Asian nations are reviving mothballed nuclear plans and setting ambitious targets and nearly half of the region could, if they pursue those goals, have nuclear energy in the 2030s. Even countries without current plans have signaled their interest. Southeast Asia has never produced a single watt of nuclear energy, despite long-held atomic ambitions. But that may soon change as pressure mounts to reduce emissions that contribute to climate change, while meeting growing power needs. The
RSS