Soon after Typhoon Danas wrecked floating photovoltaic (PV) arrays in southwestern Taiwan in the first week of July, a video began to circulate online. It showed a bird drinking from a reddish puddle beside a stack of broken PV panels, then appearing to drop dead within seconds.
Assuming the water contained toxins that had leached from the panels, some viewers jumped to a frightening conclusion: The PV systems now deployed on several reservoirs and scores of fish farms must be poisoning animals and people.
The central government, aware that such misinformation could complicate its efforts to expand Taiwan’s renewables, moved quickly to refute the rumor. According to a Ministry of Environment (MOENV) press release, on Aug. 7 their personnel visited the site, Sinjhuang Flood Detention Pond (新庄滯洪池) in Chiayi County’s Yijhu Township (義竹), to carry out tests. Neither heavy metals nor oil were detected; the pH value was normal, and the red-tinged water was attributed to the presence of humic acid in the soil.
Photo: Wang Shan-yan, Taipei times
Minister of the Environment Peng Chi-ming (彭啟明) inspected the site on Aug. 16, and confirmed that the businesses commissioned to complete the cleanup was doing so “in accordance with regulations.” Neither discarded panels nor other waste or pollution were found, but “similar reddish-brown water quality was observed,” proving that it was a natural phenomenon related to the soil type and debunking the rumors, the press release said.
More than a week later, however, piles of broken PV equipment were still visible around the pond, prompting the government to fine the operator NT$9 million. According to the United Daily News (Aug. 26), the company commissioned to clear the debris said it was a lengthy task, because the solar panels had first to be separated from the floats, then transported to one of the few enterprises authorized to process PV waste.
FAKERY AND CONFUSION
Photo: CNA
On Aug. 25, Taiwan FactCheck Center (TFC, 台灣事實查核中心) reported that the bird-death video had been generated with the assistance of AI — and that its creator, when posting the seven-second clip on microblogging platform Threads, had said so. It’s difficult to guess their motives; that Threads account later disappeared, TFC noted.
TFC, an NGO established in 2018, is accredited by Poynter Institute’s International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). In the past two years, the center has published 13 reports addressing misinformation about the environmental consequences of solar power.
On Oct. 16 this year, TFC explained that online rumors about the quality of the water in Tainan’s Wushantou Reservoir (烏山頭水庫) following the installation of a major floating PV system were the result of individuals misinterpreting transparency-index data released by the MOENV. The same day, the center released a separate statement in response to social media posts that claimed water quality tests at Wushantou had detected cleaning agents. Some netizens said the concentrations indicated that the reservoir contained 2,273kg of cleaning products. TFC pointed out that while five tests had found anionic surfactants, the results didn’t exceed acceptable limits, and two other tests had detected none. (Anionic surfactants are widely used in cleaning products, but also released into the environment via pesticides or industrial processes.)
Photo: Lin Yi-chang, Taipei Times
On Oct. 17, the center revealed that a video, supposedly showing solar panels at Wushantou being cleaned with chemicals, was originally posted on Chinese platforms by a PRC-based supplier of PV cleaning equipment. What’s more, it appeared in May 2022, 11 months before the first scheduled cleaning of the Wushantou array.
According to TFC Deputy Editor-in-chief Chen Pei-huang (陳培煌), these narratives mostly originate from social media or online discussion forums.
“They often combine genuine concerns about environmental impact with misinformation or misleading visuals. In our assessment, the majority are not deliberately malicious but stem from misunderstanding, incomplete information or distrust toward renewable-energy policies,” he says.
Photo: Steven Crook
Noting that limited scientific literacy and low trust in institutions make people more susceptible to false claims like those swirling around Wushantou, Chen explains that some individuals have a tendency to share content that’s intuitive or emotionally charged, even if there’s no evidence.
Not all of those who shared the bird death video or the assertion that Wushantou Reservoir is tainted with detergent can plead scientific illiteracy. One person who lent credence to the latter is Victor Su (蘇一峰), a chest physician in Taipei with 121,000 followers on Facebook.
Whether Su is among those who, in Chen’s words, “amplify such narratives for political or ideological reasons,” is beyond the scope of this article. However, his recent activity on Facebook suggests that he’s not a fan of the current administration.
Su’s Oct. 14 post about water quality at Wushantou attracted around 39,000 reactions and close to 3,000 comments, some of which harshly criticized the doctor’s claims. As of Nov. 6, it had been shared over 1,200 times. A TFC Facebook post made on Oct. 16 and addressing the same issue had much less of an impact, drawing 1,000 reactions and 195 shares by Nov. 6.
As Jonathan Swift wrote in 1710, “Falsehood flies, and the truth comes limping after it.”
SOLAR’S MYRIAD PROBLEMS
Chen says TFC has found that fact-checking environmental claims “requires collaboration with scientists, environmental journalists and energy experts. The goal isn’t only to debunk falsehoods but also to provide accessible scientific context, so the public can better understand complex issues like climate change and renewable energy.”
He calls on the authorities to engage in “effective public communication and transparent policy explanation,” as these can greatly reduce the spread of misinformation.
Opponents of solar energy hardly need to fabricate videos or spread rumors if they aim to cultivate public skepticism. As a recent Control Yuan report (“Questions Concerning Photovoltaic Project Applications,” published Oct. 20) makes clear, the rapid rollout of solar energy in Taiwan has been accompanied by corruption and market distortion.
The report mentions organized crime, noting that one foreign enterprise quit Taiwan after suffering six years of intimidation and blackmail attempts. Gangs have been known to mobilize protests under the pretext of environmental damage, and even directly disrupt construction, as ways of extorting money from companies.
Many in the renewables industry complain that policies often change, and that regulatory enforcement is inconsistent. What’s more, the report says, “unscrupulous individuals try to profit by exploiting lengthy and opaque processes.”
The Control Yuan document also highlights problems with the government’s “aquaculture-electricity symbiosis” policy, a scheme which encourages fish farmers to install PV systems over their ponds. Ministry of Agriculture rules make it hard for some fish-farm owners to qualify and, because they “fail to consider aquaculture practices,” the regulations sometimes undermine investment and financing proposals.
The report asserts that, without solar-power subsidies, a significant number of fish farmers would likely cease operating. This is framed as a criticism, saying current policies have created “the phenomenon of using electricity revenue to subsidize fisheries.” But if Taiwan is to bolster its food security as well as energy security, aquaculture-electricity symbiosis seems like a logical way of feeding two birds with one scone.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS