The Mercator world map, long a fixture in classrooms globally, makes the European Union appear almost as large as Africa. In reality, Africa is more than seven times bigger. It is a distortion that has prompted a new African initiative, “Correct the Map,” calling for depictions that show Africa’s true scale.
“For centuries, this map has minimized Africa, feeding into a narrative that the continent is smaller, peripheral and less important,” said Fara Ndiaye, co-founder of Speak Up Africa, which is leading the campaign alongside another advocacy group, Africa No Filter.
Accurately translating the Earth’s sphere into a flat map always calls for compromises, requiring parts to be stretched, cut or left out, experts said.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Historically, maps have reflected the worldview of their makers. Babylonian clay tablets from the sixth century BC placed their empire at the center of the world, while medieval European charts often focused on religious sites.
Choices must be made: a world map will look very different depending on whether Australia, Siberia or Europe is placed at its center.
Today’s most-used map was designed for maritime navigation by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It focused on accurate depictions of the shapes and angles of land masses, but their relative sizes were often inaccurate.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Mercator’s projection inflated northern regions and compressed equatorial ones, making Europe and North America appear much larger, while shrinking Africa and South America.
The distortions are stark: a 100-square-kilometer patch around Oslo, Norway, looks four times larger than the same area around Nairobi, Kenya. Greenland appears as large as Africa, even though it is 14 times smaller.
STRIKING A BALANCE
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Alternatives to the Mercator emerged in the 20th century, including one from 1921 by Oswald Winkel and another in 1963 by Arthur Robinson that reduced distortions but sacrificed precision. The 1970s Gall-Peters projection restored proportional sizes but stretched shapes.
To strike a balance between accuracy and aesthetics, cartographers Tom Patterson, Bojan Savric and Bernhard Jenny launched the Equal Earth projection in 2018. It makes Africa, Latin America, South Asia and Oceania appear vastly larger.
“Equal Earth preserves the relative surface areas of continents and, as much as possible, shows their shapes as they appear on a globe,” Savric said. This is the projection now endorsed by the African Union. Speak Up Africa says the next steps of their campaign are to push for adoption by African schools, media and publishers.
“We are also engaging the UN and UNESCO (its cultural body), because sustainable change requires global institutions,” Ndiaye said.
’NAIVE’ CONTROVERSY
Some critics reject claims of bias.
“Any claim that Mercator is flagrantly misleading people seems naive,” said Mark Monmonier, a Syracuse University geography professor and author of How to Lie with Maps. “If you want to compare country sizes, use a bar graph or table, not a map.”
Despite its distortions, Mercator remains useful for digital platforms because its focus on accurate land shapes and angles makes “direction easy to calculate,” said Ed Parsons, a former geospatial technologist at Google.
“While a Mercator map may distort the size of features over large areas, it accurately represents small features which is by far the most common use for digital platforms,” he said.
Having accurate relative sizes, as with the Equal Earth map, can complicate navigation calculations, but technology is adapting.
“Most mapping software has supported Equal Earth since 2018,” Savric said. “The challenge is usage. People are creatures of habit.”
Some dismiss the whole thrust of the African campaign. Ghanaian policy analyst Bright Simons says the continent needs more than a larger size on maps to “earn global respect.”
“South Korea, no matter how Mercator renders it, has almost the same GDP as all 50 African countries combined,” he said.
But advocates remain convinced of their cause. “Success will be when children everywhere open their textbooks and see Africa as it truly is: vast, central and indispensable,” Ndiaye said.
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly
RSS