Fifty-five years ago, a .25-caliber Beretta fired in the revolving door of New York’s Plaza Hotel set Taiwan on an unexpected path to democracy. As Chinese military incursions intensify today, a new documentary, When the Spring Rain Falls (春雨424), revisits that 1970 assassination attempt on then-vice premier Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). Director Sylvia Feng (馮賢賢) raises the question Taiwan faces under existential threat: “How do we safeguard our fragile democracy and precious freedom?”
ASSASSINATION
After its retreat to Taiwan in 1949, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) imposed a ruthless military rule, crushing democratic aspirations and kidnapping dissidents from abroad for imprisonment or execution. By 1970, this long-standing tyranny faced a geopolitical crisis as US President Richard Nixon began his strategic pivot toward the People’s Republic of China. A visit to the US by Chiang Ching-kuo, Chiang Kai-shek’s son and heir apparent, was thus part of a desperate attempt to manage this crisis.
Photo courtesy of PTS Viewpoint
Within the overseas Taiwanese community, assassination was discussed as a way to shatter the dynastic succession. Two main approaches were considered. Some favored a covert plot, while others insisted the act must be a public political statement. Among various plots, it was Peter Huang (黃文雄), his younger sister Cecilia Huang (黃晴美) and her husband Cheng Tzu-tsai (鄭自才) who chose open defiance.
On that rainy April 24, 1970, with Cecilia Huang concealing the pistol in her purse and Cheng providing cover, Peter opened fire at Chiang. The shot missed when a detective grabbed his wrist.
“Long live Formosa, long live Taiwan, down with Chiang Kai-shek,” Peter cried as he was dragged into a patrol car. The next morning, the New York Times ran the story on its front page, noting that the “suspect attends Cornell [University].”
Photo courtesy of PTS Viewpoint
DIVERGENT PATHS
The documentary unearths a compelling historical parallel. At Cornell University, Peter was a contemporary of another Taiwanese student, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). As part of a small community of Taiwanese overseas, they often met and shared sharp criticisms of the KMT’s authoritarian rule but chose divergent paths.
The shock of the assassination attempt is widely credited with pushing Chiang Ching-kuo to accelerate his “Taiwanization” policy, which involved promoting Taiwanese elites into government to ease dissent. One of the main beneficiaries of this policy was Lee, who would eventually succeed Chiang as president and initiate Taiwan’s “silent revolution,” dismantling the authoritarian state from within.
Photo courtesy of PTS Viewpoint
When Lee won the first direct presidential election in 1996, Peter returned to Taiwan after more than two decades of exile. The two Cornell peers were once again on the same island, continuing their fight in their own unique ways.
A NEW VISION
Upon his return, Peter Huang was invited to lead the Taiwan Association for Human Rights (TAHR), the nation’s most prominent human rights organization. There, he championed a new vision: to found the nation on human rights. He argued that rather than being trapped in a diplomatic battle with Beijing over the “One China Policy,” Taiwan could redefine itself as a modern state fully aligned with the international human rights system, empowering its NGOs to engage in “human rights diplomacy.”
I witnessed this vision take shape firsthand. With funding he secured from the UK’s Westminster Foundation for Democracy, Huang established a Law and Human Rights Internship program in 1999. As one of the first two legal interns he mentored, I became part of his project to build a new generation of activists equipped with an international perspective.
The profound wisdom of this approach became evident after 2000. As Lee’s political influence waned, Huang’s only grew. He first advised president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to make human rights a cornerstone of national policy. Then, in a testament to the vision’s power, the strategy was continued by Chen’s successor, president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the rival KMT.
This rare bipartisan consensus led to landmark legislation in 2009. Taiwan formally codified the major UN human rights covenants into domestic law, establishing a permanent international review mechanism that has institutionalized Taiwan’s connection to the global human rights system.
THE FIGHTING SPIRIT
Director Feng says the film’s title, When the Spring Rain Falls, was inspired by T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land. Just as spring represents a cruel struggle between death and rebirth, the film revisits not just a historical assassination, but the subsequent rebirth of its protagonists’ fighting spirit. To understand their full journeys, especially Cecilia Huang’s often-overlooked role and Cheng’s contributions, one must see the film.
The three protagonists were not underdogs, but the embodiment of the Taiwanese elite’s American dream. When their homeland came under existential threat, they made the extraordinary decision to risk everything in an act of open defiance. Their action was a paradigm of the Taiwanese spirit, proving that in a moment of crisis, its people are unafraid to make the ultimate sacrifice to confront tyranny.
How can a fragile democracy be safeguarded? The film finds the answer in the lives of its protagonists. Their lifelong commitment precisely captures the core of Taiwanese fighting spirit. Their resilience reveals a deeper moral strength, proving what makes a country worth defending. In an era when authoritarian powers increasingly threaten democratic values worldwide, Taiwan’s resilience demonstrates its crucial role on freedom’s front line.
The documentary is available at: shorturl.at/fjVrQ.
Hsiao I-min is a senior human rights activist and Deputy Executive Manager for the Association for Victims Support.
Following the shock complete failure of all the recall votes against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on July 26, pan-blue supporters and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were giddy with victory. A notable exception was KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), who knew better. At a press conference on July 29, he bowed deeply in gratitude to the voters and said the recalls were “not about which party won or lost, but were a great victory for the Taiwanese voters.” The entire recall process was a disaster for both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The only bright spot for
Water management is one of the most powerful forces shaping modern Taiwan’s landscapes and politics. Many of Taiwan’s township and county boundaries are defined by watersheds. The current course of the mighty Jhuoshuei River (濁水溪) was largely established by Japanese embankment building during the 1918-1923 period. Taoyuan is dotted with ponds constructed by settlers from China during the Qing period. Countless local civic actions have been driven by opposition to water projects. Last week something like 2,600mm of rain fell on southern Taiwan in seven days, peaking at over 2,800mm in Duona (多納) in Kaohsiung’s Maolin District (茂林), according to
Aug. 11 to Aug. 17 Those who never heard of architect Hsiu Tse-lan (修澤蘭) must have seen her work — on the reverse of the NT$100 bill is the Yangmingshan Zhongshan Hall (陽明山中山樓). Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) reportedly hand-picked her for the job and gave her just 13 months to complete it in time for the centennial of Republic of China founder Sun Yat-sen’s birth on Nov. 12, 1966. Another landmark project is Garden City (花園新城) in New Taipei City’s Sindian District (新店) — Taiwan’s first mountainside planned community, which Hsiu initiated in 1968. She was involved in every stage, from selecting
As last month dawned, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in a good position. The recall campaigns had strong momentum, polling showed many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers at risk of recall and even the KMT was bracing for losing seats while facing a tsunami of voter fraud investigations. Polling pointed to some of the recalls being a lock for victory. Though in most districts the majority was against recalling their lawmaker, among voters “definitely” planning to vote, there were double-digit margins in favor of recall in at least five districts, with three districts near or above 20 percent in