As the world has raced to understand how Taiwan can be both the world’s most important producer of semiconductors while also the pin in the grenade of World War III, a reasonable shelf of “Taiwan books” has been published in the last few years. Most describe Taiwan according to a power triangle dominated by the US and China. But what of the actual Taiwanese themselves? Who are they? And should they have any say in the matter?
Chris Horton’s Ghost Nation: The Story of Taiwan and Its Struggle for Survival is perhaps the first general history of Taiwan to answer these questions and do justice to its people and their long fight to build Asia’s most vibrant democracy. Not only is it a compelling read, it’s one that is utterly crucial for understanding both Taiwan’s domestic politics and global importance today.
For the last decade, Horton has reported from Taiwan for the New York Times, the Guardian and the Atlantic, where he once described the nation’s predicament — that of an independently governed territory vital to the world economy but only given full diplomatic recognition by only about a dozen UN member states — as a “geopolitical absurdity.”
In Ghost Island, Horton covers Taiwan from disputes over ancient territorial claims to semiconductors and current tensions with Beijing, but where he really shines is in a long overdue history of Taiwan’s road to democracy.
PROTO DEMOCRACY
Proto-movements for Taiwanese self-determination emerged during the island’s Japanese colonial era — in 1923, Taiwan’s first pilot, Hsieh Wen-ta (謝文達), dropped a load of political leaflets over Tokyo as part of a campaign for local representation in government — but today Taiwan’s sense of unique identity is largely defined against the island’s occupation by Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) armies following World War II.
When Chiang retreated to Taiwan in 1949, bringing with him more than a million soldiers, bureaucrats and refugees, he established rule over a population that was by then mainly Hokkien and Hakka Chinese, immigrants from south China during the previous 300 years who’d intermixed with what was by then a small minority of indigenous Austronesian peoples.
These “native born Taiwanese,” who’d become prosperous and educated under Japanese colonial rule, were alarmed by the arriving KMT troops, a ragged, shambling bunch who were not only unsanitary — they reintroduced both bubonic plague and cholera to Taiwan — but were also horribly corrupt, looted everything in sight and spoke Chinese dialects that were to all intents completely different languages.
Tensions between the two populations, the “native born” benshengren (本省人) and the “foreign born” waishengren (外省人), boiled over in February 1947, when a street scuffle exploded into a KMT massacre of thousands of native Taiwanese. (No full accounting of the slaughter has ever been made.)
This original trauma, now known as the 228 Incident and referred to by some waishengren as their “original sin,” was a defining national moment for the Taiwanese comparable to the atomic bombs of World War II for the Japanese or 9-11 for America. In subsequent decades, the memory of 228, hardened by 38 years of KMT military rule and White Terror, coalesced as a raison d’etre for movements for Taiwanese identity and democratic self-determination, notions that most Taiwanese citizens hold self-evident today.
DEMOCRACY MOVEMENTS
Under a repressive military regime, Taiwan’s first major democracy movements sprung up in exile, with the earliest in Japan. There in 1962, Su Beng (史明), who’d conspired to assassinate Chiang Kai-shek a decade earlier, published a seminal treatise on Taiwanese identity, Taiwan’s 400 Year History. In it, he argued that a distinct Taiwanese identity had been forged by four centuries of colonization by Dutch, French, Spanish, and Japanese.
Two years later, Peng Ming-min (彭明敏), a native Taiwanese who’d become a rising star as a KMT technocrat, became one of the first to broach nativist ideas within Taiwan. Aged 39, he issued a manifesto, “A Declaration of Taiwanese Self-Salvation” that called for the end of Chiang Kai-shek’s plans to retake China, a new constitution for the island nation and the acknowledgment that Taiwan and China were separate countries.
The KMT rewarded Peng with imprisonment, but after six years he escaped into exile in the US. There he continued to write, and, following Taiwan’s 1971 expulsion from the UN, he charged in an op-ed for the New York Times that Taiwan’s leaders “must learn to distinguish ethnic origin and culture from politics and law, and to discard their archaic obsession to claim anyone of Chinese ancestry as legally Chinese, however far removed from China.”
Overseas voices like Peng and Su emboldened Taiwan’s domestic activists. In 1979, a group, believing that Taiwan must forge its own future after the US cut diplomatic ties the previous year, launched a new publication, Formosa Magazine, as a mouthpiece for their still somewhat underground political movement, the tangwai (黨外) or “outside of the party” movement.
Formosa Magazine’s offices, located in major cities around the island, effectively acted as a network of political offices that would later evolve into Taiwan’s first pro-democracy opposition party, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). In the magazine’s first issue, they declared, “we believe that it is no longer the right of any regime or the literati it nurtures to decide our future path and destiny, but the right of all of us, the people.”
After four issues and explosive publication runs, the KMT banned the magazine and, in military courts, convicted its leaders, the “Kaohsiung Eight,” of sedition with sentences of ten years to life in prison.
But before any could serve their full time, the KMT ended martial law in 1987, and most sentences were commuted. The DPP formally came into being in 1986, and for the following two decades, Kaohsiung Incident activists dominated its leadership. One of the defense lawyers, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), went on to become Taiwan’s first DPP president in 2000. For his vice president he chose the magazine’s editor, Annette Lu (呂秀蓮).
PARTISAN PERSPECTIVE
Horton details this part of Taiwan’s story wonderfully, but it’s important to note that he does so as a partisan of the DPP’s independence-leaning green camp.
The KMT is meanwhile cast as a one-dimensional bogeyman, and this is a flaw. While KMT oppression was deplorable, the party did facilitate Taiwan’s economic miracle, allow degrees of social liberalization and permit independent, non-KMT mayors of several cities, including Taipei, from the 1950s to the 1970s. By uniformly disparaging the century-old party, it makes it difficult to understand why it remains a viable, powerful force in Taiwan’s politics today.
Ghost Nation also suffers from a jerky structure, and if you don’t track Taiwan’s politics, some references may be hard to follow. But all told, there is no better general history of modern Taiwan currently on the market.
This is especially true when it comes to current China tensions. Here, Horton forcefully blames the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for its threats to destroy Taiwan and its hard-won democracy. But he also dares to remind us, “It is not the CCP that has erased Taiwan, it is us: the liberal democracies, the developed economies, the supposed friends of Taiwan. We have ghosted Taiwan, and in doing so, have lost a little of our own humanity.”
As mega K-pop group BTS returns to the stage after a hiatus of more than three years, one major market is conspicuously missing from its 12-month world tour: China. The omission of one of the group’s biggest fan bases comes as no surprise. In fact, just the opposite would have been huge news. China has blocked most South Korean entertainment since 2016 under an unofficial ban that also restricts movies and the country’s popular TV dramas. For some Chinese, that means flying to Seoul to see their favorite groups perform — as many were expected to do for three shows opening
A recent report from the Environmental Management Administration of the Ministry of Environment highlights a perennial problem: illegal dumping of construction waste. In Taoyuan’s Yangmei District (楊梅) and Hsinchu’s Longtan District (龍潭) criminals leased 10,000 square meters of farmland, saying they were going to engage in horticulture. They then accepted between 40,000 and 50,000 cubic meters of construction waste from sites in northern Taiwan, charging less than the going rate for disposal, and dumped the waste concrete, tile, metal and glass onto the leased land. Taoyuan District prosecutors charged 33 individuals from seven companies with numerous violations of the law. This
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry consumes electricity at rates that would strain most national grids. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) alone accounted for more than 9 percent, or 2,590 megawatts (MW), of the nation’s power demand last year. The factories that produce chips for the world’s phones and servers run around the clock. They cannot tolerate blackouts. Yet Taiwan imports 97 percent of its energy, with liquefied natural gas reserves measured in days. Underground, Taiwan has options. Studies from National Taiwan University estimate recoverable geothermal resources at more than 33,000 MW. Current installed capacity stands below 10 MW. OBSTACLES Despite Taiwan’s significant geothermal potential, the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) returned from her trip to meet People’s Republic of China (PRC) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) bearing “a gift” for the people of Taiwan: 10 measures the PRC proposed to “facilitate the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.” “China on Sunday unveiled 10 new incentive measures for Taiwan,” wrote Reuters, wrongly. The PRC’s longstanding habit with Taiwan relations is to repackage already extant or once-existing policies and declare that they are “new.” The list forwarded by Cheng reflects that practice. NEW MEASURES? Note the first item: establishing regular communication mechanisms between the Chinese Communist Party
RSS