In 1998, Roy and Silo, a pair of male chinstrap penguins at Central Park Zoo in New York, were given an abandoned egg to incubate after zookeepers observed them performing mating rituals together. For 34 days, they took turns sitting on it. When the egg hatched, the story became a viral sensation. The New York Times celebrated “A Love That Dare Not Squeak Its Name”. Roy, Silo and their daughter Tango became the subject of a LGBTQ-friendly children’s book, And Tango Makes Three by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell.
Biology professor Nathan Lents remembers receiving copies of Tango as a gift when he and his husband became foster parents. Fast-forward to the present day, and Tango tops Pen America’s list of the most frequently banned picture books in the US. It was part of a high-profile lawsuit in Nassau County, Florida, and was designated for pulping by officials in Singapore. In 2025, it’s apparent that “conventional categories for gender identity and expression, and sexual attraction and romanticism, are just not cutting it any more,” Lents writes. Queer, non-binary, transgender, polyamorous — terms that were perhaps once obscure are here to stay. But at the same time, a powerful backlash is under way.
This book isn’t a directly political text, but its colorful tales from the animal world do have a point of view: biology, Lents argues here, comes down strongly against rigid categories. The story of sexual evolution is one of experimentation and constant improvisation, and that, he says, goes a long way to explaining why human sexual norms seem to be undergoing a transformation: “I assert that this moment of sexual turmoil is actually a rediscovery of the much more expansive relationship with sex that our ancestors once had and that other animals enjoy,” he writes.
What follows is an entertaining and informative romp through mating strategies in nature. From Komodo dragons’ virgin births to the bilateral sperm transfer of hermaphroditic slugs, The Sexual Evolution chronicles a “wondrous variety” of behavior in the animal world. Garter snake orgies, gender-masking hyenas, lusty bonobos and the lesbian Laysan albatrosses of Hawaii — this book has it all.
All that diversity is fascinating, and frequently funny. Take the family structures of clown fish like the ones in Pixar’s 2003 hit Finding Nemo. The film tells the touching story of a dad fish’s quest to be reunited with his son after the mum is eaten, but “if the movie were biologically accurate, the story would have proceeded a little differently,” Lents says.
“Upon the loss of his mate, Marlin would have transitioned to female. By the time Marlin reunited with Nemo, she would have been his mother.”
And then? Once Marlin and Nemo established a new home, they would have begun to breed — together.
While same-sex penguin unions might be sweet, clearly things tend to work a little bit differently in the non-human world than they do in our own. Animals can’t tell us why they mate or pair or behave the way they do. And humans have an unhelpful tendency to project their own biases on to their observations — something that is evident in the long history of sexism in biological sciences.
“As the mostly male scientists through the last two centuries looked around at the animal world, they were all too eager to find validation for male dominance in human society,” Lents notes.
For this reason, The Sexual Evolution is careful to avoid making simplistic comparisons, especially when it comes to the sex lives of other primates, such as chimps and bonobos.
Unfortunately, the book’s final chapters, which turn to our own relationships, are its least compelling. Can we really draw any conclusions about human sexuality from our piecemeal knowledge of sexual norms in hunter-gatherer societies? Or from the swinging seductions of highly successful Soviet spies? Not all stories make useful parables. The Sexual Evolution is at its strongest when it’s simply revelling in kaleidoscopic tales of how other species do it.
As Lents points out: “The natural world is a constantly churning diversity-generating machine, and the natural history of sex reflects that.”
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
The older you get, and the more obsessed with your health, the more it feels as if life comes down to numbers: how many more years you can expect; your lean body mass; your percentage of visceral fat; how dense your bones are; how many kilos you can squat; how long you can deadhang; how often you still do it; your levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol; your resting heart rate; your overnight blood oxygen level; how quickly you can run; how many steps you do in a day; how many hours you sleep; how fast you are shrinking; how
“‘Medicine and civilization’ were two of the main themes that the Japanese colonial government repeatedly used to persuade Taiwanese to accept colonization,” wrote academic Liu Shi-yung (劉士永) in a chapter on public health under the Japanese. The new government led by Goto Shimpei viewed Taiwan and the Taiwanese as unsanitary, sources of infection and disease, in need of a civilized hand. Taiwan’s location in the tropics was emphasized, making it an exotic site distant from Japan, requiring the introduction of modern ideas of governance and disease control. The Japanese made great progress in battling disease. Malaria was reduced. Dengue was
RSS