From unmasking art forgery to uncovering the secrets of the Notre-Dame cathedral, an imposing machine outside Paris can turn back the clock to reveal the truth.
It uses a technique called carbon dating, which has “revolutionized archaeology,” winning its discoverer a Nobel Prize in 1960, French scientist Lucile Beck said.
Beck spoke in front of the huge particle accelerator, which takes up an entire room in the carbon dating lab of France’s Atomic Energy Commission in Saclay, outside the capital.
Photo: AFP
Beck described the “surprise and disbelief” among prehistorians in the 1990s when the machine revealed that cave art in the Chauvet Cave in France’s southeast was 36,000 years old.
The laboratory uses carbon dating, also called carbon-14, to figure out the timeline of more than 3,000 samples a year.
HOW DOES IT WORK?
First, each sample is examined for any trace of contamination.
“Typically, they are fibers from a jumper” of the archaeologist who first handled the object, Beck said.
The sample is then cleaned in an acid bath and heated to 800 degrees Celsius to recover its carbon dioxide. This gas is then reduced to graphite and inserted into tiny capsules.
Next, these capsules are put into the particle accelerator, which separates their carbon isotopes.
Isotopes are variants of the same chemical element which have different numbers of neutrons.
Some isotopes are stable, such as carbon-12. Others — such as carbon-14 — are radioactive and decay over time.
Carbon-14 is constantly being created in Earth’s upper atmosphere as cosmic rays and solar radiation bombard the chemical nitrogen.
In the atmosphere, this creates carbon dioxide, which is absorbed by plants during photosynthesis.
Then animals such as ourselves get in on the act by eating those plants.
So all living organisms contain carbon-14, and when they die, it starts decaying. Only half of it remains after 5,730 years.
After 50,000 years, nothing is left — making this the limit on how far back carbon dating can probe.
By comparing the number of carbon-12 and carbon-14 particles separated by the particle accelerator, scientists can get an estimate of how old something is.
Cosmic radiation is not constant, nor is the intensity of the magnetic field around Earth protecting us from it, Beck said.
That means scientists have to make estimations based on calculations using samples whose ages are definitively known.
This all makes it possible to spot a forged painting, for example, by demonstrating that the linen used in the canvas was harvested well after when the purported painter died.
The technique can also establish the changes in our planet’s climate over the millennia by analyzing the skeletons of plankton found at the bottom of the ocean.
NOTRE-DAME REVEALED
Carbon dating can be used on bones, wood and more, but the French lab has developed new methods allowing them to date materials that do not directly derive from living organisms.
For example, they can date the carbon that was trapped in iron from when its ore was first heated by charcoal.
After Paris’s famous Notre-Dame cathedral almost burned to the ground in 2019, this method revealed that its big iron staples dated back to when it was first built — and not to a later restoration, as had been thought.
The technique can also analyze the pigment lead white, which has been painted on buildings and used in artworks across the world since the fourth century BC.
To make this pigment, “lead was corroded with vinegar and horse poo, which produces carbon dioxide through fermentation,” Beck explained.
She said she always tells archaeologists: “don’t clean traces of corrosion, they also tell about the past!”
Another trick made it possible to date the tombs of a medieval abbey in which only small lead bottles had been found.
As the bodies in the tombs decomposed, they released carbon dioxide, corroding the bottles and giving scientists the clue they needed.
“This corrosion was ultimately the only remaining evidence of the spirit of the monks,” Beck mused.
Following the shock complete failure of all the recall votes against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on July 26, pan-blue supporters and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were giddy with victory. A notable exception was KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), who knew better. At a press conference on July 29, he bowed deeply in gratitude to the voters and said the recalls were “not about which party won or lost, but were a great victory for the Taiwanese voters.” The entire recall process was a disaster for both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The only bright spot for
Water management is one of the most powerful forces shaping modern Taiwan’s landscapes and politics. Many of Taiwan’s township and county boundaries are defined by watersheds. The current course of the mighty Jhuoshuei River (濁水溪) was largely established by Japanese embankment building during the 1918-1923 period. Taoyuan is dotted with ponds constructed by settlers from China during the Qing period. Countless local civic actions have been driven by opposition to water projects. Last week something like 2,600mm of rain fell on southern Taiwan in seven days, peaking at over 2,800mm in Duona (多納) in Kaohsiung’s Maolin District (茂林), according to
Aug. 11 to Aug. 17 Those who never heard of architect Hsiu Tse-lan (修澤蘭) must have seen her work — on the reverse of the NT$100 bill is the Yangmingshan Zhongshan Hall (陽明山中山樓). Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) reportedly hand-picked her for the job and gave her just 13 months to complete it in time for the centennial of Republic of China founder Sun Yat-sen’s birth on Nov. 12, 1966. Another landmark project is Garden City (花園新城) in New Taipei City’s Sindian District (新店) — Taiwan’s first mountainside planned community, which Hsiu initiated in 1968. She was involved in every stage, from selecting
As last month dawned, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in a good position. The recall campaigns had strong momentum, polling showed many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers at risk of recall and even the KMT was bracing for losing seats while facing a tsunami of voter fraud investigations. Polling pointed to some of the recalls being a lock for victory. Though in most districts the majority was against recalling their lawmaker, among voters “definitely” planning to vote, there were double-digit margins in favor of recall in at least five districts, with three districts near or above 20 percent in