At the end of the “Battle Dictatorship” rally on Saturday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) delivered a fiery speech and thanked the KMT heavyweights for their support. He then strode off the stage into the fired-up crowd like a conquering hero surrounded by adoring fans.
Despite the cross-partisan tradition in Taiwan of wildly inflating crowd numbers, this was an unambiguously large turnout. Everyone who is anyone in the KMT rallied to Chu’s call.
Giving all of them a chance to speak prolonged the event, but on balance this was a good problem for Chu to have. It sent a clear message that the party was unified behind their leader, who two weeks earlier had been perceived as ineffective.
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
An outnumbered but still significant number of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) supporters and politicians turned out. I was initially confused by a group of them holding up gold, birthday party-style balloons spelling out “FREEK P” until realizing that the spacing should have been “FREE KP,” referencing the “Ko P” nickname of their founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is currently on trial for alleged corruption.
A highly anticipated guest, legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), was as charismatic and full of self-deprecating humor, showing his man-of-the-people bona fides.
The DPP accused Han of breaching the neutrality of his position as speaker by attending the rally, and initially Han was slow to agree to appear, likely due to this concern.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
The rally, while undoubtedly a resounding success for both Chu and the KMT, raises the question: what’s next?
CHU GOES ALL IN ON THE BASE
Chu has been criticized as KMT leader about the failure of the KMT-backed recall campaigns to show much motivation or drive, and for their lackluster results in the face of far more successful pan-green campaigns. The KMT attempted to pump up the energy by proposing referendums on opposing martial law and ending the death penalty, but since there is no martial law and the death penalty is still in force, this motivated almost nobody.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Chu’s impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutors offices and use of new language like “green commies” did work in attracting the base’s attention. The fact that the rally was illegal only added to the drama.
He skillfully built up the excitement in the deep blue base over the last week and a half, culminating in Saturday’s rally. Does Chu have a plan to keep this momentum going? This bears watching, momentum is tricky to keep up, and he and his party will need all they can get this year.
While it is logical to pump up the base to drive recall and voting turnout in any by-elections, it also comes with risks.
Chu’s formulation “oppose red commies, oppose green commies” was meant to suggest that the KMT is also tough on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) because he knows the public perception of the party being pro-Beijing is a big vote loser in national elections. But it didn’t catch on.
Chinese state-owned media praised the rally, but carefully avoided referencing “green commies.”
Chu might be sacrificing long-term interests for short-term goals. Previously he has been cautious about what he says, knowing that it could come back to haunt him.
He has now taken on the language of party extremists, which even light blues find a bit much.
“This dictator [President William Lai (賴清德)] is carrying out a Cultural Revolution in Taiwan — a green [DPP] Cultural Revolution aimed at eliminating all dissent,” Chu said, adding that the president was “more communist than the communists, more fascist than the fascists.”
He also proposed a recall campaign against Lai, which is a non-starter because it would require DPP lawmaker support.
If Chu wins re-election as party chair in September, his vitriolic attacks will resurface in DPP campaign advertising targeting his party as extremist. But it wasn’t just Chu — all but one of the speakers used extremist language.
The Presidential Office Building served as a backdrop to the rally, its tower rising high above the stage. Listening to the vitriol and accusations directed at the president, one half expected the eye of Sauron to materialize at the top of the tower and ring wraiths to fly out of the building to slay opposition party politicians.
LU SPEAKS TO THE MAINSTREAM
The one politician whose speech entirely lacked vitriol was presumptive 2028 KMT presidential candidate and Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕). She stuck to substance, warning of a “tsunami” of worldwide economic impact from US President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the effect it may have on business and people’s livelihoods.
In the middle of a rally describing President Lai as a dictator, a communist and a fascist it was jarring to hear her refer to his administration respectfully as “Taiwan’s leaders.” She appealed to these leaders with reasonable requests to prepare for the tariffs.
Lu’s moderate remarks did not get much reaction, the muted applause was polite.
Faced with this reaction, will Lu continue with her more moderate, constructive message for the broader public, or will she be tempted by the lure of passionate responses from a relatively small portion of the electorate? It would not be surprising, considering the way the party is moving, for there to be pressure on her to do so.
Watch closely, it will speak to her discipline and focus. When she first became Taichung mayor she spoke like the legislator she had previously been, blaming the ruling DPP for everything.
Her popularity tanked, so she adapted and behaved like a problem-solving mayor, working with the government when possible and putting her loyalty to her city above partisan considerations. Her popularity skyrocketed.
WHITHER THE TPP?
Previously, to his supporters, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang’s (黃國昌) image was of a determined, righteous fighter for justice. To his detractors, he was viewed as an insufferably smug, perpetual self-righteousness machine.
Now he is all in on being an outraged populist demagogue. His speeches are shouting, rage-filled rants against DPP “dictatorship,” leaving no room for compromise.
During the Sunflower movement era, his “hero fighting for justice” persona was beloved by many young supporters. He appears to be trying to replicate that with the TPP’s young “little sprout” movement.
This is working for now with a narrower slice of the electorate, but he is in his fifties and risks this new generation eventually getting bored with this routine. It has a shelf life, and he’s backing himself into a corner.
Does he have any future vision for re-inventing himself or the TPP?
While his party showed up in force, there was a glaring absence: legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊). She is the one top TPP figure avoiding extreme language and openly questioning some of the party’s decisions. She can not push it too far, or as a party list legislator she will be out of a job.
She gives the impression she is not happy with the direction and decisions her party has been making.
What is she up to? Will Huang Kuo-chang try to oust her?
Keep an eye on her, she may be a bellwether figure going forward.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) told legislators last week that because the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) are continuing to block next year’s budget from passing, the nation could lose 1.5 percent of its GDP growth next year. According to the DGBAS report, officials presented to the legislature, the 2026 budget proposal includes NT$299.2 billion in funding for new projects and funding increases for various government functions. This funding only becomes available when the legislature approves it. The DGBAS estimates that every NT$10 billion in government money not spent shaves 0.05 percent off
It is a soulful folk song, filled with feeling and history: A love-stricken young man tells God about his hopes and dreams of happiness. Generations of Uighurs, the Turkic ethnic minority in China’s Xinjiang region, have played it at parties and weddings. But today, if they download it, play it or share it online, they risk ending up in prison. Besh pede, a popular Uighur folk ballad, is among dozens of Uighur-language songs that have been deemed “problematic” by Xinjiang authorities, according to a recording of a meeting held by police and other local officials in the historic city of Kashgar in
Dec. 29 to Jan. 4 Like the Taoist Baode Temple (保德宮) featured in last week’s column, there’s little at first glance to suggest that Taipei’s Independence Presbyterian Church in Xinbeitou (自立長老會新北投教會) has Indigenous roots. One hint is a small sign on the facade reading “Ketagalan Presbyterian Mission Association” — Ketagalan being an collective term for the Pingpu (plains Indigenous) groups who once inhabited much of northern Taiwan. Inside, a display on the back wall introduces the congregation’s founder Pan Shui-tu (潘水土), a member of the Pingpu settlement of Kipatauw, and provides information about the Ketagalan and their early involvement with Christianity. Most
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) was out in force in the Taiwan Strait this week, threatening Taiwan with live-fire exercises, aircraft incursions and tedious claims to ownership. The reaction to the PRC’s blockade and decapitation strike exercises offer numerous lessons, if only we are willing to be taught. Reading the commentary on PRC behavior is like reading Bible interpretation across a range of Christian denominations: the text is recast to mean what the interpreter wants it to mean. Many PRC believers contended that the drills, obviously scheduled in advance, were aimed at the recent arms offer to Taiwan by the
RSS