0nkering for a chiseled jawline, a male TikTok influencer strikes his cheekbones with a hammer — highlighting the rise of “looksmaxxing,” an online trend pushing unproven and sometimes dangerous techniques to boost sexual appeal.
Looksmaxxing influencers — part of an online ecosystem dubbed the “manosphere” — have surged in popularity across social media, capitalizing on the insecurities of young men eager to boost their physical attractiveness to women.
In posts across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, they promote pseudoscientific methods to achieve everything from pouty lips to chin extensions and almond-shaped “hunter eyes,” often while monetizing their popularity by endorsing a range of consumer products.
Photo: AFP
In more extreme cases, these influencers advocate taking steroids, undergoing plastic surgery and even “leg-lengthening” procedures to become more attractive.
While women may pay regular visits to aestheticians or buy new beauty products, spurring a global beauty retail market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, the manosphere at times promotes a DIY approach that draws on the nearest toolbox.
“Babe, what’s taking you so long in the bathroom?” reads the caption flashing across a viral TikTok video of a man seen hitting his cheeks with the sharp edge of a hammer, in what he calls his “skincare routine.”
Photo: AFP
Underneath the video are dozens of comments warning that “bone smashing,” also known as the hammer technique, was “dangerous” while others hailed it as a legitimate way to achieve an angular jawline.
In other videos, British influencer Oscar Patel promoted “mewing,” an unproven technique that involves pressing the tongue into the roof of the mouth for improving jaw and facial structure.
Without offering evidence, he told his nearly 188,000 TikTok followers that such tricks would turn them into a “PSL god,” an Internet slang for exceptionally attractive men, short for Perfectly Symmetrical Looks.
‘TOXIC COMINATION’
In another video, US-based TikToker Dillon Latham misleadingly told his 1.7 million followers to whiten their teeth by applying hydrogen peroxide to their teeth with a Q tip.
Some dentists warn that regularly using store-bought peroxide could damage tooth enamel and gums.
The looksmaxxing trend is fueling “an industry of influencers who promote ‘perfect bodies and perfect faces,’ often to feather their own nest,” said Siddharth Venkataramakrishnan, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
“Among men, this is mixed with the misogyny of the manosphere, which often blames women for male insecurities, creating a toxic combination,” he added.
Many looksmaxxing influencers appear to have a financial incentive, frequently leveraging their popularity to promote products ranging from skin cleansers to pheromone perfumes, and even Chinese knock-off watches.
Looksmaxxing is rooted in “incel” — or involuntarily celibate — communities, an Internet subculture rife with misogyny, with men tending to blame women and feminism for their romantic failings.
“The incel ideology is being rebranded to looksmaxxing on TikTok,” said Anda Solea, a researcher at the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Portsmouth.
In a study, Solea found that incel-inspired accounts on TikTok were circumventing a ban on hateful language with a focus on looksmaxxing and more palatable words about self-improvement.
“There are a lot of pressures on men — we want to protect women from gender-based violence but we should also be careful about young men and boys,” Solea said.
‘DEEPLY DAMAGING’
Other related maxxing trends have also gained traction, including “gymmaxxing,” which focuses on building muscle, and “moneymaxxing,” which centers on improving financial status — all with the ultimate goal of increasing sexual desirability.
Looksmaxxing influencers — many of whom idolize male models such as Australian Jordan Barrett and American Sean O’Pry — have amassed massive followings as algorithms propel their content to millions.
These algorithms can lead to real-world harm, experts warn. The danger was dramatized in the recent Netflix hit Adolescence, which follows the case of a 13-year-old boy accused of killing a classmate after consuming misogynistic content online.
The fictional crime drama references the popular but unfounded “80/20” theory that claims 80 percent of women are attracted to 20 percent of men.
In a study last year, researchers at Dublin City University created fake accounts registered as teenage boys. They reported that their TikTok and YouTube feeds were “bombarded” with male supremacy and misogynistic content.
“More widely, this does feed into toxic beauty standards which affect men as well as women,” said Venkataramakrishnan, from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
“The idea that if you don’t look like a Hollywood star, you might as well give up trying for a relationship is deeply damaging.”
Michael slides a sequin glove over the pop star’s tarnished legacy, shrouding Michael Jackson’s complications with a conventional biopic that, if you cover your ears, sounds great. Antoine Fuqua’s movie is sanctioned by Jackson’s estate and its producers include the estate’s executors. So it is, by its nature, a narrow, authorized perspective on Jackson. The film ends before the flood of allegations of sexual abuse of children, or Jackson’s own acknowledgment of sleeping alongside kids. Jackson and his estate have long maintained his innocence. In his only criminal trial, in 2005, Jackson was acquitted. Michael doesn’t even subtly nod to these facts.
The March/April volume of Foreign Affairs, long a purveyor of pro-China pablum, offered up another irksome Beijing-speak on the issues and solutions for the problems vexing the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the US: “America and China at the Edge of Ruin: A Last Chance to Step Back From the Brink” rang the provocative title, by David M. Lampton and Wang Jisi (王緝思). If one ever wants to describe what went wrong with US-PRC relations, the career of Wang Jisi is a good place to start. Wang has extensive experience in the US and the West. He was a visiting
The January 2028 presidential election is already stirring to life. In seven or eight months, the primary season will kick into high gear following this November’s local elections. By this point next year, we will likely know the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate and whether the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) will be fielding a candidate. Also around this time, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will either have already completed their primary, or it will be heading into the final stretch. By next summer, the presidential race will be in high gear. The big question is who will be the KMT’s
If one asks Taiwanese why house prices are so high or why the nation is so built up or why certain policies cannot be carried out, one common answer is that “Taiwan is too small.” This is actually true, though not in the way people think. The National Property Administration (NPA), responsible for tracking and managing the government’s real estate assets, maintains statistics on how much land the government owns. As of the end of last year, land for official use constituted 293,655 hectares, for public use 1,732,513 hectares, for non-public use 216,972 hectares and for state enterprises 34 hectares, yielding
RSS