The People’s Republic of China (PRC) last week offered us a glimpse of the violence it plans against Taiwan, with two days of blockade drills conducted around the nation and live-fire exercises not far away in the East China Sea. The PRC said it had practiced hitting “simulated targets of key ports and energy facilities.”
Taiwan confirmed on Thursday that PRC Coast Guard ships were directed by the its Eastern Theater Command, meaning that they are assumed to be military assets in a confrontation. Because of this, the number of assets available to the PRC navy is far, far bigger than shown by many of the neat charts being passed around. Recall also that the PRC has a seaborne militia, the People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM), primarily composed of small craft. Anyone who imagines these will be easily taken care of should bone up on the history of US PT boats, German E-boats and, especially, the Italian MAS.
The exercises were accompanied by propaganda cartoons that emphasized the PRC’s knowledge of Taiwan politics by echoing the talking points of its political ally, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The cartoons depicted President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) as corrupt, abusing power in prosecuting Beijing’s preferred presidential candidate in last year’s election, former Taiwan People’s Party chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), hollowing out Taiwan via Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) investments in the US and rejecting the Republic of China (ROC). These are all KMT talking points, intended to increase skepticism of the US and distrust of the DPP.
Photo: Reuters
Actions speak louder than words, and the PRC undermined its anti-DPP position with its violent threats. History shows that the public tends to move toward the DPP when the PRC gets too close. The PRC also presented excellent reasons for Taiwan to increase its military spending, right out in front where the public could see them, again in the midst of a major recall by civil society organizations targeting KMT politicians. That recall is driven in part by the pro-China parties’ attacks on defense spending.
GRID UPGRADES NEEDED
While there was much focus on the PRC’s very obvious and comical propaganda campaign, the key words there are “ports,” “energy sites” and “blockade.” As I have observed before, PRC navy doctrine calls for the blockade to be accompanied by bombardment. Last week’s exercise illustrated that rather dramatically. In a blockade, the electrical grid and its power plants are going to be hit, including its nuclear plants. That is what Russia is doing to Ukraine at the moment, except that the PRC attacks are likely to be much greater in volume and competence.
Photo: AFP
Commentators who demand that Taiwan spend more on defense typically imply this to mean acquisition of weapons, military training and the like. That is only half the battle. The real theater of combat, as Ukraine shows, is going to be the electrical system. Taiwan needs to urgently increase spending on defense via investments in electrical grid upgrades aimed at national security, anti-drone measures around power stations and substations and distributed off-grid electrical production. These are absolutes if Taiwan is to weather a blockade. Missile stockpiles are pointless without an electrical grid.
Ukraine has learned this.
“Protecting the grid’s key substations is now the single most important priority for the survival of the Ukrainian state,” Theresa Sabonis-Helf wrote in a piece at War on the Rocks.
Photo: EPA-EFE
One of the key pillars of Ukraine’s power strategy is having secure off-grid power sources for its nuclear power plants. Ironically, in war, the nuclear plants in Taiwan so many claim are vital in a blockade will become liabilities, generating headaches for grid managers rather than electricity.
REJECT RENEWABLES AT YOUR PERIL
But shooting down incoming missiles and drones is only half the problem. Another fork of Ukraine’s grid defense is its ability to rapidly repair damaged electrical sites. It also complements its nuclear power plants with a distributed energy production system, according to Sabonis-Helf.
“Such a system would integrate renewables, batteries and modular gas turbines, which could significantly improve the resilience of the grid,” she writes.
Ukraine has imported 1.5 million power generators and 200 megawatts of power storage, according to her data. Seen in that light, Taipower’s opposition to renewables and other modern energy systems is a disaster for both the environment and national security.
Like Taiwan, Ukraine has five large cities of over 900,000 people each, Sabonis-Helf notes, adding: “Large urban areas such as these rapidly become ungovernable without electricity.”
In summer, the tens of thousands of apartment units that developers have saddled the island with are going to turn into ovens without electricity. Unlike Ukrainians, Taiwanese whose cities have died have no place to run to.
Fortunately, the legal and grid framework for a distributed power system already exists. Taipower’s own figures show that at the end of 2023, it had contracts with “9 independent power producers (IPPs), 48 co-generation power providers and … 55,385 contracts for solar, wind, hydropower and other forms of renewable energy.”
It said 71KWh of electricity was purchased from external sources in 2023, a tiny fraction of the roughly 20-26 million KWh of electric power consumed each month, peaking each August. Obviously, there is room for expansion.
SOLUTIONS
The government needs to move on this urgently. First, it has to start pointing to the electricity dimension of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to mobilize public opinion. It can use that same approach with foreign commentators demanding that Taiwan spend more to justify enhanced grid spending to both them and to the local public.
Then it needs to put in place programs to train a reserve of maintenance and repair personnel, to massively expand off-grid and private power production (a simple, good start would be to reverse the July 2020 decision of the Council on Agriculture to ban small farm solar production), and cram Taiwan with renewable energy systems with abundant overcapacity.
Finally it needs to make defense preparations for the grid highly visible to the public. Some shouting and screaming about power conservation would also be useful for both the environment and national security.
Pro-Taiwan outsiders commenting on Taiwan need to consistently raise grid issues in their discussions of Taiwan’s defense. As history shows, external publicity can be effective in creating change.
Finally, the threat to the power grid highlights the rhetorical and strategic purposes of the KMT-driven “debate” over nuclear power. The KMT keeps “nuclear power” in the public eye because, by doing so, it channels the debate into a pointless struggle over whether to turn the island’s aged, irrelevant nuke plants back on, diverting funds and attention from where they are urgently needed: power grid defense, decentralization, multi and off-grid sourcing and hardening. Worse, if the KMT were to “win” that debate, the island’s grid would become more centralized, making it more vulnerable not only to attack, but to the mere threat of attack.
Simple: as long as we are talking about nuclear power, the KMT is winning.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
The US war on Iran has illuminated the deep interdependence of Asia on flows of oil and related items as raw materials that become the basis of modern human civilization. Australians and New Zealanders had a wake up call. The crisis also emphasizes how the Philippines is a swatch of islands linked by jet fuel. These revelations have deep implications for an invasion of Taiwan. Much of the commentary on the Taiwan scenario has looked at the disruptions to world trade, which will be in the trillions. However, the Iran war offers additional specific lessons for a Taiwan scenario. An insightful
The problem with Marx’s famous remark that history repeats itself, first as tragedy, the second time as farce, is that the first time is usually farce as well. This week Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made a pilgrimage to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) “to confer, converse and otherwise hob-nob” with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials. The visit was an instant international media hit, with major media reporting almost entirely shorn of context. “Taiwan’s main opposition leader landed in China Tuesday for a rare visit aimed at cross-strait ‘peace’”, crowed Agence-France Presse (AFP) from Shanghai. Rare!
April 6 to April 13 Few expected a Japanese manga adaptation featuring four tall, long-haired heartthrobs and a plucky heroine to transform Taiwan’s television industry. But Meteor Garden (流星花園) took the nation by storm after premiering on April 12, 2001, single-handedly creating the “idol drama” (偶像劇) craze that captivated young viewers across Asia. The show was so successful that Japan produced its own remake in 2005, followed by South Korea, China and Thailand. Other channels quickly followed suit, with more than 50 such shows appearing over the following two years. Departing from the melodramatic
Sunflower movement superstar Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) once quipped that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could nominate a watermelon to run for Tainan mayor and win. Conversely, the DPP could run a living saint for mayor in Taipei and still lose. In 2022, the DPP ran with the closest thing to a living saint they could find: former Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中). During the pandemic, his polling was astronomically high, with the approval of his performance reaching as high as 91 percent in one TVBS poll. He was such a phenomenon that people printed out pop-up cartoon
RSS