Up until 2020, Anna Wong had gone her entire adulthood in Los Angeles without ever facing blatantly racist abuse for being Asian. After COVID-19 hit, she was accosted twice in six months.
The first time, she was browsing an aisle in Bed Bath & Beyond when a white, 30-something woman suddenly yelled: “Six feet away from me, you Chinese witch!”
A shaken Wong left the store, the woman still yelling after her. The second time, Wong was walking her dog when a passenger in a car — a young Hispanic man — screamed at her “Thanks for ruining the world,” followed by an ethnic slur.
Photo: AP
“The first, second year of the pandemic, I do distinctly remember thinking ... I was very nervous to go out,” said Wong, who did not report the incidents to police. “Am I going to draw attention to the fact that I’m Asian?”
It seemed unfathomable she was facing such anti-Asian vitriol nearly a century after her aunt, pioneering movie star Anna May Wong, dealt with constant racial discrimination.
It was five years ago that pandemic-fueled abuse of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders became so frequent — reports spiked 35 percent from March 2020 to the end of 2021 — that a reporting center was formed. Stop AAPI Hate legitimized fears of a concurrent pandemic of xenophobia. The group’s data prompted national legislative action, including the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act, and galvanized advocacy among young people within the Asian American community.
Photo: AP
NEW CONCERNS
Five years later, Stop AAPI Hate is receiving fewer incident reports yearly but they’re still happening by the hundreds and are likely an undercount. Now, those still fighting anti-Asian hate are worried it will only intensify in a political climate of immigration crackdowns, English-only mandates and bans on DEI initiatives.
During President Donald Trump’s first term, many partially blamed him for framing COVID-19 with racist language. Trump said his remarks were “not racist at all.” Now, there is concern not just about hate but erasure of Asian American and Pacific Islander history and culture. For example, this month the Pentagon mistakenly took down Web pages honoring Japanese American servicemen.
“What’s the opposite of diversity? It’s segregation or re-segregation,” Manjusha Kulkarni, Stop AAPI Hate co-founder, said, referring to Trump’s policies so far. “They want to put us — people of color, women, LGBTQ — sort of back in our ‘place,’ which means not with access to jobs or housing or ability to celebrate our holidays.”
STOP AAPI HATE
Kulkarni, executive director of the AAPI Equity Alliance, Cynthia Choi of Chinese for Affirmative Action, and San Francisco State University professor Russell Jeung came together in 2020 after a Los Angeles teen of Asian descent was assaulted at school. They solicited accounts of hate acts from victims, even those not legally hate crimes. They received a barrage.
“We said ‘Well, the first thing we need to know and understand is how big of a problem is this,’” Kulkarni said, adding that she will be eternally grateful that people responded. “That helped us to know what was going on.”
Besides federal hate crimes legislation, Stop AAPI Hate’s data led to the passing of three California bills. These included expanding civil rights protection in public spaces and studying hate-driven harassment on public transit. They’ve also attempted social media campaigns like “Spread AAPI Love,” the opposite of their moniker.
Even though the pandemic has abated, their data shows racism prevails. From March 2020 to the end of 2023, Stop AAPI Hate collected over 12,000 reports though they believe it’s likely an undercount. Over 700 occurred in 2023. Figures for 2024 will be released in May.
Also in 2023, an AAPI Data and Associated Press-NORC poll found a third of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders say they have experienced an act of abuse based on their race or ethnicity in the last year.
An FBI analysis from that year found out of 7,049 reported hate crime offenses motivated by race, ethnicity or ancestry, 6.6 percent involved anti-Asian bias. Kash Patel, the first person of color and Asian American to be agency director, talked about being subjected to racism during his confirmation hearing.
ACTIVISM
There was a groundswell of Asian American activism after 2020, according to Stop AAPI Hate. Their 2023 report found nearly 3 in 4 Asian American and Pacific Islander adults participated in activities to reduce or resist racism.
William Diep, who was 16 in 2020, was disturbed by attacks he heard about in New York City. So he started a campaign, “Virus: Racism.” He virtually gathered testimonies from young people about anti-Asian encounters. The project deeply affected him.
“I learned to stick up for people,” said Diep, now a senior at Columbia University.
He wonders how advocates can navigate the current political climate and if government resources such as translations or race-based census research will be eliminated.
“I’m scared that there’s no one to protect Asian Americans,” Diep said. “I think Asian Americans protect each other, but I question the infrastructure that exists to protect our rights and our heritage.”
Stop AAPI Hate does rely on some federal funding. Ideally, neither the government nor any other outside force will be able to dictate or hamper the organization’s work.
“We hope not. I mean, we’re fighting as hard as we can,” Kulkarni said.
Now, the coalition’s focus has expanded to include educating people about issues like birthright citizenship, cultural school curriculum and immigrants’ rights. Some Asian legal U.S. residents say they are being targeted for deportation.
“I hope and strongly believe that our communities are stronger, that we’re more equipped to handle the challenges of today, which are even more significant than they were in 2020,” Kulkarni said. “We were built for this and our values remain the same.”
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
The other day, a friend decided to playfully name our individual roles within the group: planner, emotional support, and so on. I was the fault-finder — or, as she put it, “the grumpy teenager” — who points out problems, but doesn’t suggest alternatives. She was only kidding around, but she struck at an insecurity I have: that I’m unacceptably, intolerably negative. My first instinct is to stress-test ideas for potential flaws. This critical tendency serves me well professionally, and feels true to who I am. If I don’t enjoy a film, for example, I don’t swallow my opinion. But I sometimes worry
US President Donald Trump’s bid to take back control of the Panama Canal has put his counterpart Jose Raul Mulino in a difficult position and revived fears in the Central American country that US military bases will return. After Trump vowed to reclaim the interoceanic waterway from Chinese influence, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed an agreement with the Mulino administration last week for the US to deploy troops in areas adjacent to the canal. For more than two decades, after handing over control of the strategically vital waterway to Panama in 1999 and dismantling the bases that protected it, Washington has