To help meet the cost of moving about 10,000 residents from low-lying homes menaced by rising sea levels and floods, the remote Pacific Ocean nation of Nauru aims to sell citizenships for the climate-threatened island.
President David Adeang is seeking to raise an initial US$65 million for work to transform the barren interior — left as an uninhabitable moonscape by decades of phosphate mining — with a project to ultimately develop a new township, farms and workplaces. Around 90 percent of the population would eventually be relocated under the plan.
Foreigners paying at least US$140,500 for a passport will likely never step foot on the island nation, which lies around 4,000km northeast of Sydney, though can take advantage of visa-free access to destinations including the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“While the world debates climate action, we must take proactive steps to secure our nation’s future,” Adeang, elected in 2023, said in a written response to questions. “We will not wait for the waves to wash away our homes and infrastructure.”
CLIMATE CHANGE
Nauru follows Dominica in aiming to use proceeds from citizenship sales to protect their populations from escalating impacts of climate change. It’s an illustration of the challenges small nations face in securing funding to deploy on initiatives to boost resilience. While rich economies have increased the rate of loans and grants to developing countries, the gap between available and required adaptation financing could be as much as US$359 billion a year, the UN Environment Program said in a November report.
Photo: AP
Negotiators for a bloc of small island states, including Nauru, at one point abruptly walked out of tense climate finance talks during last year’s COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, and an eventual deal — under which wealthy states pledged to deliver at least US$300 billion in annual support for climate action —fell far short of the more than US$1 trillion a year that had been sought.
Adaptation initiatives “require substantial financial resources which is an ongoing struggle,” Adeang told the UN General Assembly in New York last September. “When it comes to climate finance, we are too often relegated to the back of the queue.”
Between 2008 and 2022, Nauru received US$64 million in development financing that had a principal focus on addressing climate change, according to the Lowy Institute, a foreign affairs think tank.
Nauru faces significant increases in extreme flooding in the coming decades, according to NASA’s Sea Level Change Team. The number of flooding days — when water levels were at least 0.5 meters above a benchmark — totaled 8 between 1975 to 1984, and 146 between 2012 and 2021, the NASA data shows. Already, the estimated annual cost to small island developing states — a group of 39 nations that includes Jamaica and Fiji — from coastal flooding is more than US$1.6 billion a year.
A higher frequency of major floods threatens to overwhelm Nauru’s coastal population centers, government buildings, and the nation’s only airport — with a runway that’s adjacent to the ocean, said Alexei Trundle, associate director (international) at the Melbourne Centre for Cities, and who is helping Nauru develop a vulnerability assessment report.
Passport sales alone won’t fully cover the costs of Nauru’s Higher Ground Initiative, first outlined in 2019, and officials are exploring the potential to also win support from public and private sources. An initial A$102 million (US$65 million) phase is underway to free up about 10 hectares of land on the island’s so-called Topside, which was mined for phosphate — commonly used in fertilizer — for about a century from the early 1900s. Nauru gained independence in 1968.
“Demand for these sorts of programs is not going to go away,” said Kristin Surak, an associate professor of political sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Science, and author of The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires.
It means it’s important there’s transparency “in terms of vetting and in terms of flows of money,” she said.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
Toward the outside edge of Taichung City, in Wufeng District (霧峰去), sits a sprawling collection of single-story buildings with tiled roofs belonging to the Wufeng Lin (霧峰林家) family, who rose to prominence through success in military, commercial, and artistic endeavors in the 19th century. Most of these buildings have brick walls and tiled roofs in the traditional reddish-brown color, but in the middle is one incongruous property with bright white walls and a black tiled roof: Yipu Garden (頤圃). Purists may scoff at the Japanese-style exterior and its radical departure from the Fujianese architectural style of the surrounding buildings. However, the property