To help meet the cost of moving about 10,000 residents from low-lying homes menaced by rising sea levels and floods, the remote Pacific Ocean nation of Nauru aims to sell citizenships for the climate-threatened island.
President David Adeang is seeking to raise an initial US$65 million for work to transform the barren interior — left as an uninhabitable moonscape by decades of phosphate mining — with a project to ultimately develop a new township, farms and workplaces. Around 90 percent of the population would eventually be relocated under the plan.
Foreigners paying at least US$140,500 for a passport will likely never step foot on the island nation, which lies around 4,000km northeast of Sydney, though can take advantage of visa-free access to destinations including the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“While the world debates climate action, we must take proactive steps to secure our nation’s future,” Adeang, elected in 2023, said in a written response to questions. “We will not wait for the waves to wash away our homes and infrastructure.”
CLIMATE CHANGE
Nauru follows Dominica in aiming to use proceeds from citizenship sales to protect their populations from escalating impacts of climate change. It’s an illustration of the challenges small nations face in securing funding to deploy on initiatives to boost resilience. While rich economies have increased the rate of loans and grants to developing countries, the gap between available and required adaptation financing could be as much as US$359 billion a year, the UN Environment Program said in a November report.
Photo: AP
Negotiators for a bloc of small island states, including Nauru, at one point abruptly walked out of tense climate finance talks during last year’s COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, and an eventual deal — under which wealthy states pledged to deliver at least US$300 billion in annual support for climate action —fell far short of the more than US$1 trillion a year that had been sought.
Adaptation initiatives “require substantial financial resources which is an ongoing struggle,” Adeang told the UN General Assembly in New York last September. “When it comes to climate finance, we are too often relegated to the back of the queue.”
Between 2008 and 2022, Nauru received US$64 million in development financing that had a principal focus on addressing climate change, according to the Lowy Institute, a foreign affairs think tank.
Nauru faces significant increases in extreme flooding in the coming decades, according to NASA’s Sea Level Change Team. The number of flooding days — when water levels were at least 0.5 meters above a benchmark — totaled 8 between 1975 to 1984, and 146 between 2012 and 2021, the NASA data shows. Already, the estimated annual cost to small island developing states — a group of 39 nations that includes Jamaica and Fiji — from coastal flooding is more than US$1.6 billion a year.
A higher frequency of major floods threatens to overwhelm Nauru’s coastal population centers, government buildings, and the nation’s only airport — with a runway that’s adjacent to the ocean, said Alexei Trundle, associate director (international) at the Melbourne Centre for Cities, and who is helping Nauru develop a vulnerability assessment report.
Passport sales alone won’t fully cover the costs of Nauru’s Higher Ground Initiative, first outlined in 2019, and officials are exploring the potential to also win support from public and private sources. An initial A$102 million (US$65 million) phase is underway to free up about 10 hectares of land on the island’s so-called Topside, which was mined for phosphate — commonly used in fertilizer — for about a century from the early 1900s. Nauru gained independence in 1968.
“Demand for these sorts of programs is not going to go away,” said Kristin Surak, an associate professor of political sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Science, and author of The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires.
It means it’s important there’s transparency “in terms of vetting and in terms of flows of money,” she said.
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly