When reacting to Oscar nominations, actors traditionally err on the side of hyperbole. This year was no exception.
“I don’t know if I’m quite in my body,” said Demi Moore, on learning she was shortlisted for The Substance.
“I looked at my phone and fell on the floor,” said Monica Barbaro, who plays Joan Baez in A Complete Unknown.
Photo: AP
“I actually haven’t stopped sobbing,” offered Ariana (Wicked) Grande.
Karla Sofia Gascon, however, bucked the trend. The first out trans actor ever nominated for an Oscar took the opportunity to address the executive order signed by Donald Trump earlier this week, restricting US government recognition to only biological sex.
“He is shameless,” she said. “I hope that whatever needs to happen happens to shut everyone up, on both sides.”
Photo: AP
Such focus in the debate until the ceremony on March 2 seems unlikely. This year’s Oscar contenders amount to a collective broadside against a president campaigned against by almost everyone in the industry. His re-election — and the collapse in celebrity leverage that it revealed — remains a sore point. As the Golden Globes host Nikki Glaser reminded her A-list audience earlier this month: “You’re all so famous, so talented, so powerful, you could really do anything. Well, except tell the country who to vote for.”
Hollywood has therefore opted to vote with its Academy ballots, giving a leg-up to films that conspicuously critique the Maga worldview. Hence, perhaps, such an extravagant embrace for Emilia Perez, a French musical about a trans Mexican gangster that has been criticized as “offensive” by both Mexican and trans communities, and met with a mixed reception from critics and audiences (with Rotten Tomatoes scores of 76 percent and 30 percent respectively).
Nonetheless, the film has smashed the record set by Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Roma for the most nominations for a film not in the English language, scoring 13 to their 10, putting it just one behind the all-time record earned by All About Eve, Titanic and La La Land.
The only film on this year’s lists that is more of an explicit attack on the new president is The Apprentice, Ali Abbasi’s unflattering biopic of the young Trump, focusing on his rise to power and ill-treatment of his then wife, Ivana, and one-time mentor, the lawyer Roy Cohn.
A “disgusting hatchet job,” was the verdict of its subject, who called its makers “HUMAN SCUM” and urged audiences to avoid it. US distributors ran correspondingly scared, despite strong reviews and an eight-minute standing ovation at Cannes, until the small outfit Briarcliff eventually risked releasing it in October.
The film’s leading actor, Sebastian Stan, reported that Hollywood was so intimidated by Trump that none of his peers would appear opposite him in Variety’s annual Actors on Actors series, in which awards contenders quiz one another on video.
“We couldn’t get past the publicists or the people representing them because they were too afraid to talk about this movie,” he said. Variety verified his claims.
Nonetheless, three days after Trump’s inauguration, Stan landed an Oscar nomination — as did the supporting actor Jeremy Strong (who plays Cohn). Both men expressed their shock, with the former calling the Academy “brave” and the later saying the nods felt “absolutely miraculous.”
Such a miracle, says Variety’s executive editor, Steven Gaydos, is thanks to a “stick it to the man” passion that has been brewing in Hollywood since 2016 and is now turbocharged by Trump’s re-election. (The fires that have destroyed many voters’ homes over the past fortnight, he suggests, may have fuelled a devil-may-care recklessness.)
Not only has this feeling propelled such films into pole position, says Gaydos, it may push some over the finish line: “This sentiment could benefit them all come Oscar night.” The competition may therefore be decided as much on how much the movie baits the president as its artistic merit.
Campaigns are likely to start to amplify such credentials. The smash-hit fantasy Wicked could be seen as an incisive critique of racism and fascism via a green-skinned witch and talking animals.
Indeed it’s hard to identify a film on the shortlist that can’t be interpreted as a salvo against the 47th president. The space opera Dune: Part Two cautions against colonization; The Brutalist is scathing in its portrayal of the way the US treats immigrants. Nickel Boys addresses head-on the institutionalized murder of young Black men in the Jim Crow south. Anora examines sexual exploitation and the wealth divide; The Substance satirizes reality TV’s obsession with eternal youth and Brazil’s I’m Still Here shows what life looks like under military dictatorship.
Writing in the New Yorker after this year’s nominations, the critic Richard Brody said the “members of the Academy have, in effect, responded to the natural and political disasters of the moment in the name of solidarity.”
“A remarkable consensus has crystallized among a small number of movies that, in one way or another ... embody, display, or at least appear to celebrate the liberal values of pluralism, equality, and resistance to the arrogance of power, be it political or economic. This time around, the Oscars are circling the wagons.”
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS