K-pop fan Kim Na-yeon used to buy stacks of the same album when there was a new release, hoping to find one of the rare selfies of her favorite stars tucked between the plastic covers.
Over the years, her burgeoning CD collection expanded to every inch of her shelves, prompting her to question its impact on the environment.
“These things are made from materials that are really difficult to recycle,” Kim said. “That got me thinking about how much carbon must be emitted to produce or get rid of them.”
Photo: AFP
Kim’s collection is part of a growing mountain of discarded CDs and merchandise waste that has swelled alongside K-pop’s global popularity.
Made with polycarbonate, CDs can be recycled but only through a special treatment process that prevents toxic gases from being released into the environment. Along with the plastic packaging, producing a CD generates about 500 grams of carbon emissions, according to an environmental impact study by Britain’s Keele University.
Based on that calculation, the weekly sales of a single top K-pop group could be “equivalent to the emissions from flying around the Earth 74 times,” said Kim.
The fan has joined a climate protection group called Kpop4Planet, which wants to hold the industry responsible for its impact on the environment.
‘MANIPULATION’
Started in 2020 by an Indonesian K-pop fan, the activist group has held protests outside the headquarters of music labels, urging them to stop “Plastic Album Sins.” The group has also collected signatures for petitions demanding a reduction in plastic production and other marketing schemes that fuel consumption as CD sales continue to rise significantly.
More than 115 million K-pop CDs were sold last year, the first time sales breached the 100 million mark for the industry.
It was a jump of 50 percent from the previous year, even though most fans are now streaming the music online rather than putting physical CDs into music players.
But K-pop fans continue to snap them up because they are attracted by the labels’ marketing ideas, Kim said.
Using promotions like offering limited edition “photocards” of the stars in the albums or a chance to win a video call with the idol, the music labels tempt fans to buy more CDs.
“So each album is basically a lottery ticket,” said K-pop fan Roza De Jong.
“The narrative is very much ‘the more you buy, the bigger your chance,’” she said, adding it was “common to see piles of plastic albums stacked on stairways and scattered across the streets of Seoul” after the buyers had picked through them for the promotional photo or ticket.
EXPLOITATIVE
Albums are also sometimes released with different covers.
“We call all of these (sales techniques) exploitative marketing,” said Kim, accusing the music labels of “manipulating” fans’ love for their artists.
HYBE, the agency behind megastars BTS, said the company has been putting effort into becoming climate friendly.
“As part of our environmental initiatives, we are using ecofriendly materials for our albums, video publications and official merchandise, minimizing plastics,” the entertainment powerhouse said, without offering greater specifics.
Industry figures suggest that album production skyrocketed during the pandemic, with experts saying that labels were looking to sales to make up for the lack of touring revenues.
While CD consumption is not limited to K-pop, activists say the South Korean industry has to play a part in cutting the waste.
Seventeen, a popular South Korean boyband, alone sold over 5.5 million copies of their album FML last year, setting the record for the highest-selling single album in K-pop history.
To discourage CD manufacturing and purchases, South Korea’s environment ministry began charging a penalty in 2003, but the tiny sums involved have had little effect in the face of the huge revenues generated by album sales.
Entertainment labels last year were charged approximately 2.0 billion won (US$143,000), said Yoon Hye-rin, deputy director of the ministry’s Resource Circulation Policy Division.
While taking aim at the labels, Kim said she would not boycott the artists.
“They aren’t the ones who know or decide the marketing schemes,” Kim said. “Every fan wants to see their artist thrive, so boycotting isn’t an option.”
When life gives you trees, make paper. That was one of the first thoughts to cross my mind as I explored what’s now called Chung Hsing Cultural and Creative Park (中興文化創意園區, CHCCP) in Yilan County’s Wujie Township (五結). Northeast Taiwan boasts an abundance of forest resources. Yilan County is home to both Taipingshan National Forest Recreation Area (太平山國家森林遊樂區) — by far the largest reserve of its kind in the country — and Makauy Ecological Park (馬告生態園區, see “Towering trees and a tranquil lake” in the May 13, 2022 edition of this newspaper). So it was inevitable that industrial-scale paper making would
July 21 to July 27 If the “Taiwan Independence Association” (TIA) incident had happened four years earlier, it probably wouldn’t have caused much of an uproar. But the arrest of four young suspected independence activists in the early hours of May 9, 1991, sparked outrage, with many denouncing it as a return to the White Terror — a time when anyone could be detained for suspected seditious activity. Not only had martial law been lifted in 1987, just days earlier on May 1, the government had abolished the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist
Hualien lawmaker Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) is the prime target of the recall campaigns. They want to bring him and everything he represents crashing down. This is an existential test for Fu and a critical symbolic test for the campaigners. It is also a crucial test for both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and a personal one for party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). Why is Fu such a lightning rod? LOCAL LORD At the dawn of the 2020s, Fu, running as an independent candidate, beat incumbent Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and a KMT candidate to return to the legislature representing
Asked to define sex, most people will say it means penetration and anything else is just “foreplay,” says Kate Moyle, a psychosexual and relationship therapist, and author of The Science of Sex. “This pedestals intercourse as ‘real sex’ and other sexual acts as something done before penetration rather than as deserving credit in their own right,” she says. Lesbian, bisexual and gay people tend to have a broader definition. Sex education historically revolved around reproduction (therefore penetration), which is just one of hundreds of reasons people have sex. If you think of penetration as the sex you “should” be having, you might
RSS