Taiwan’s cities are a good bit cleaner than they used to be, but — as I discussed in my Sept. 25 column (“Is a cleaner countryside in Taiwan possible?”) — the same can’t be said for rural areas.
Litter that ends up where it shouldn’t is, at best, an eyesore. In many cases, it’s liable to impact wildlife or break down into potentially-harmful microplastics.
Each of Taiwan’s 22 counties and cities has a reporting mechanism through which the public can notify their local government of improper waste disposals. In some places, including Taipei and Taichung, whistleblowers are entitled to a financial reward if a litterbug can be identified and fined.
Photo: by Steven Crook
‘SHOCKING’
One resident who’s brought instances of illegal dumping to the attention of the authorities is Guillaume Brissaud, a Frenchman who’s been in Taiwan for 19 years.
The professional chef, who lives in a rural part of Yilan County’s Dongshan Township (冬山), admits to different layers of motivation.
Photo: by Steven Crook
“I’ve always been close to nature, and I walk through my neighborhood every morning and evening. Seeing trash in the bushes and along the riverbed is a source of personal discomfort,” he says.
Brissaud is also passionate about ocean conservation, and is acutely aware that what happens in Taiwan’s waterways has an impact on the marine environment. He’s midway through officially registering the NGO he co-founded, Wild Ocean Taiwan, saying he hopes it “can build the ocean conservation community, as it seems that existing organizations aren’t working well together.”
Describing the amount of trash he’s come across near his home as “shocking,” he explains that most of it appears to be household garbage, but there’s also some construction and agricultural waste. He suspects that the illegal dumping mostly happens at night.
Photo: by Steven Crook
Brissaud initially wanted to organize a cleanup, but his wife — who works for Society Of Wilderness (SOW, 荒野保護協會), a local environmental NGO — advised him to instead call the Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) of Yilan County Government.
“They came immediately and said they’d take care of the garbage in the bushes and beside the road, but couldn’t do anything about the riverbed, because that’s the responsibility of a different agency,” he recalls.
The EPB helped Brissaud contact the First River Management Branch of the Water Resources Agency, part of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. The river management unit told him that, because of staffing shortages, it’d be a month before they could attend the location.
Photo: by Steven Crook
Five weeks passed and nothing happened. Then, a few weeks before I spoke with Brissaud, he spotted a dead Reeves’s muntjac on the bed of the creek, which for much of the year has no surface flow. “I reported it. They came quickly and removed the dead animal, but not the garbage,” he says.
More than two months after he first alerted the authorities to the state of the waterway, Brissaud got fed up with waiting and took matters into his own hands. In early September, he and 10 volunteers — nine locals from the adjacent indigenous community plus a member of Wild Ocean Taiwan from another part of the county — devoted a day to collecting and bagging as much trash as they could.
Some spots were dumping grounds for farming waste. At one site, they found hundreds of PET bottles, already in bags.
Photos courtesy of Guillaume Brissaud
“There were also numerous engine oil containers, lots of plastic trash, and yet more plastic bottles,” he says.
Asked how much waste they ended up removing, Brissaud replies, “I thought about weighing what we picked up, but there was way more than we expected and we got kind of overwhelmed. The day was super hot and we all got covered in ants.”
TaiwanPlus, the state-funded English-language TV channel, reported on the cleanup, and Brissaud hopes publicity will push the First River Management Branch to install cameras. Around-the-clock surveillance, he thinks, might reduce both the amount of rubbish and the authorities’ workload.
MIXED RESULTS
Since mid-2022, I’ve submitted more than 50 reports through Tainan’s online Chinese-language Citizen Mailbox (cmsweb.tainan.gov.tw/RWD/#/report), alerting the city government to the presence of garbage beside roads, on farmland and in woodlands. But the very first formal request I made to investigate what I guessed to be illegal dumping was to the Pingtung County Government.
While exploring the northeastern corner of the county in early 2022, I came across a section of slopeland that had become an unofficial trash dump. At home, I uploaded the photos I’d taken via the county government’s Web site. Detailed comments weren’t needed, I reckoned, because the images spoke for themselves.
Some days later, I received an email telling me that the morning after I’d sent in my report, Pingtung County’s EPB dispatched staff to the location in Sandimen Township (三地門). There they found “several black bags of garbage, two bundles of plastic sheets, plastic buckets, flower pots and other general waste,” but were unable to identify those responsible.
Noting that the land was within a Slopeland Conservation Area (山坡地保育區), they said they would order its owner to rectify the situation “within a time limit,” and that, if he or she failed to do so, penalties would be imposed. At the same time, the landowner was told to improve management of the plot, so as to avoid future problems of this kind.
It wasn’t clear how many days the landowner would be given to clear away the trash, and whether there would be a follow-up inspection, yet I found the response encouraging. Filing these reports is easy once you’ve done it a few times, so I’ve continued to send them in.
On occasion, the result is just what I wished for. A bike ride through Tainan’s Sinshih District (新市) prompted me to complain about a pile of trash beside a backcountry road. Within a couple of weeks, the city’s EPB told me they’d completed the cleanup; they even attached before and after photos of the site to their email.
Responding to another report I made, Tainan’s EPB said they’d not only cleared up the spent fireworks and firecracker fragments I’d come across on a levee road in Sinhua District (新化), but they’d also “liaise with the local River Management Branch to seek CCTV footage that might help identify the litterbugs.”
Also in Sinhua, I was glad to notice that a burned-out car close to Freeway 3 was removed soon after I’d notified the authorities.
While the EPB responds to every report, in some cases they’re unable or unwilling to take swift action.
After I notified them about a large amount of trash next to one of Gueiren District’s (歸仁) major roads, officials informed me via email that they’d send a letter to the property’s owner, directing him or her to “make improvements.” Having seen the alacrity with which some people here ignore laws and regulations they find inconvenient, I wasn’t confident a mere letter would bring about any change.
When I complained about abandoned cars in Cigu District (七股) — not far, it should be said, from Taijiang National Park (台江國家公園) and its waterbird wintering grounds — the response reassured me of just one thing: That all relevant procedures would be followed, not that the actual problem would be solved.
LIMITS ON WHAT CAN BE DONE
Local governments’ efforts to keep the countryside clean are constrained not only by their financial and human resources, but also by the ordinances that provide a legal basis for entering private property and issuing fines.
The “trash waterfall” (垃圾瀑布) I came across not far from Thousand Buddha Bodhi Temple (千佛山菩提寺) in Tainan’s Guanmiao District (關廟) was truly disgusting, yet the authorities decided they could do no more than issue a letter “asking the landowner to clean up and make improvements.”
Despite the appalling state of the land, it didn’t fall within the scope of the Tainan City Self-Government Ordinance for the Management of Vacant Land and Vacant Buildings, according to an emailed response from the EPB, the reason being that, “there’s no stagnant water at the site, so no danger of breeding mosquitoes.”
In certain circumstances, the ordinance empowers city officials to remove waste from private land, then recover the cost of the cleanup from the plot’s owner.
As the existing enforcement framework doesn’t appear to deter those intent on dumping waste improperly, it’s perhaps time to consider radical measures.
Imposing strict liability on landowners, making them entirely responsible for keeping their properties clear of non-biodegradable trash, would likely result in the proliferation of ugly fences and CCTV infrastructure.
Moving much more quickly to ban all single-use items would be a good start. At the same time, the government should expand the existing 4-in-1 recycling system, so as to create demand for other materials that are often illegally dumped. If people could sell old bricks and broken cisterns left over from house renovations, they’d be less inclined to toss them into remote gullies. That may sound like bribing people to do the right thing, but we have to recognize the reality of human nature if we’re to protect Mother Nature.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
From the last quarter of 2001, research shows that real housing prices nearly tripled (before a 2012 law to enforce housing price registration, researchers tracked a few large real estate firms to estimate housing price behavior). Incomes have not kept pace, though this has not yet led to defaults. Instead, an increasing chunk of household income goes to mortgage payments. This suggests that even if incomes grow, the mortgage squeeze will still make voters feel like their paychecks won’t stretch to cover expenses. The housing price rises in the last two decades are now driving higher rents. The rental market
July 21 to July 27 If the “Taiwan Independence Association” (TIA) incident had happened four years earlier, it probably wouldn’t have caused much of an uproar. But the arrest of four young suspected independence activists in the early hours of May 9, 1991, sparked outrage, with many denouncing it as a return to the White Terror — a time when anyone could be detained for suspected seditious activity. Not only had martial law been lifted in 1987, just days earlier on May 1, the government had abolished the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist
When life gives you trees, make paper. That was one of the first thoughts to cross my mind as I explored what’s now called Chung Hsing Cultural and Creative Park (中興文化創意園區, CHCCP) in Yilan County’s Wujie Township (五結). Northeast Taiwan boasts an abundance of forest resources. Yilan County is home to both Taipingshan National Forest Recreation Area (太平山國家森林遊樂區) — by far the largest reserve of its kind in the country — and Makauy Ecological Park (馬告生態園區, see “Towering trees and a tranquil lake” in the May 13, 2022 edition of this newspaper). So it was inevitable that industrial-scale paper making would
Hualien lawmaker Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) is the prime target of the recall campaigns. They want to bring him and everything he represents crashing down. This is an existential test for Fu and a critical symbolic test for the campaigners. It is also a crucial test for both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and a personal one for party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). Why is Fu such a lightning rod? LOCAL LORD At the dawn of the 2020s, Fu, running as an independent candidate, beat incumbent Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and a KMT candidate to return to the legislature representing
RSS