Charles Yeh’s (葉子揚) battle with disinformation in Taiwan began with a bowl of beef noodles. Nine years ago, the Taiwanese engineer was at a restaurant with his family when his mother-in-law started picking the green onions out of her food. Asked what she was doing, she explained that onions can harm your liver. She knew this, she said, because she had received text messages telling her so.
Yeh was puzzled by this. His family had always happily eaten green onions. So he decided to set the record straight.
He put the truth in a blog post and circulated it among family and friends through the messaging app Line. They shared it more broadly, and soon he received requests from strangers asking to be connected to his personal Line account.
Photo: AFP
“There wasn’t much of a factchecking concept in Taiwan then, but I realized there was a demand. I could also help resolve people’s problems,” Yeh said. So he continued, and in 2015 launched the Web site MyGoPen (麥擱騙), which means, “don’t be fooled again” in Taiwanese.
Within two years, MyGoPen had 50,000 subscribers. Today, it has more than 400,000. Last year, it received 1.3 million fact check requests and has debunked disinformation on everything from carcinogens in bananas to the false claim that Taiwan’s new president, William Lai (賴清德), had a child out of marriage.
Other factchecking organizations have emerged, including Taiwan FactCheck Center, Cofacts and DoubleThink Lab.
But as factchecking organizations have grown, so has the threat of disinformation.
CHINA THREAT
The University of Gothenburg’s Varieties of Democracy project lists Taiwan as the target of more disinformation from abroad than any other democracy, ahead of Latvia and the US. The biggest threat comes from across the Taiwan Strait and it is most intense around election periods.
Taiwanese civic organization Doublethink Lab tracks China’s influence in 82 countries on sectors like academia, the media and domestic politics. It ranks Taiwan first in terms of the degree of China’s influence on its society and its media, and 11th overall.
In February this year, after two Chinese fishers died in a speedboat crash while being chased by Taiwan’s coastguard, after which Beijing condemned Taiwan, a video circulating online claimed to show 100 Chinese fishing vessels surrounding Taiwan’s Kinmen islands in retaliation.
But MyGoPen pointed out that the video was taken last year in the waters near the eastern Chinese provinces of Shandong and Zhejiang, when the boats were returning to port at the end of a fishing season.
Huang Jaw-Nian (黃兆年), associate professor at Taiwan’s National Chengchi University, says Beijing has evolved its strategy from a more direct approach — like disseminating the false allegation in 2020 that then president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who was running for re-election, had fabricated her doctorate degree — to an indirect approach. For example, Beijing has used the Israel-Gaza war to cast doubt on the US’s approach to global politics — and therefore to Taiwan.
These “misleading narratives,” he says, can be harder to counter because they are based on opinion or perspective. “There is no right or wrong to a perspective,” he said. “It’s no longer a question of true or false.”
One important way to beat such narratives is to ensure a diverse media environment and that the public builds a habit of getting information from multiple sources, he says.
As for China’s view, when a report from the US state department last year claimed that Beijing was expanding its disinformation efforts, China’s foreign affairs ministry responded by calling the claims themselves disinformation.
“The US Department of State report is in itself disinformation as it misrepresents facts and truth. In fact, it is the US that invented the weaponizing of the global information space,” a spokesperson said when asked about the report.
AI: ‘SYSTEMATIC OPERATION AT WORK’
Artificial intelligence is a rapidly growing challenge for factcheckers. A recent report by the Thomson Foundation on AI disinformation attacks during the presidential election in January concluded that the onslaught has “continued unabated” and is evolving.
Eve Chiu (邱家宜), head of the non-profit Taiwan FactCheck Center, describes AI’s development as “unstoppable.” There was a widespread use of deep fakes overlaid with AI-generated celebrity voices during the January elections, she says.
“The large amount of false information about election manipulation which spread before and after polling day via TikTok, in an attempt to subvert the results of Taiwan’s democratic elections, indicated a systematic operation at work,” she says.
MyGoPen’s Yeh is daunted by the challenge of disinformation generated and spread by AI, but says that it can also have benefits. It can be used to generate verbatim transcripts, for example, which improves the efficiency of checking video and audio materials.
And MyGoPen already uses bots to help respond to many of the requests the platform receives. Its bots receive and, using the MyGoPen database, respond to about 3,000 inquiries daily, he said. But it also has a Line account that provides a one-on-one factchecking service with a live factchecker. Also, AI “speeds up the checking process — helps with comparison, identification and translation — and we use it for some situations,” though verification still happens manually.
Yeh stresses that it is also really important to educate people on China’s changing disinformation tactics. He likens people who spread disinformation to fraudsters coming up with new ways to deceive people out of their money.
“Just like fraud, the tactics are always changing, but the goal — to cheat you of your money — doesn’t.”
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
Many people noticed the flood of pro-China propaganda across a number of venues in recent weeks that looks like a coordinated assault on US Taiwan policy. It does look like an effort intended to influence the US before the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) over the weekend. Jennifer Kavanagh’s piece in the New York Times in September appears to be the opening strike of the current campaign. She followed up last week in the Lowy Interpreter, blaming the US for causing the PRC to escalate in the Philippines and Taiwan, saying that as
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
RSS