Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁), current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) heavyweight legislator and longtime “King of Hualien,” has been a busy man. Last month he proposed a draft statute that would govern the construction of a highway through the Rift Valley between Hualien and Taitung counties. That was accompanied by similar draft proposals for extending the high speed rail system around the island and for pushing Freeway No. 6 through the mountains to Hualien. That last proposal echoed former Taichung mayor Jason Hu’s (胡志強) old proposal for a tunnel through the Central Mountain Range to link Fu’s birthplace, Taichung, with his current fiefdom, Hualien. Taichung, it should be recalled, is run by KMT Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕).
The projects, which resemble the classic construction-industrial state projects of the KMT heyday, are backed by other prominent KMT politicians. According to reports in the Taipei Times, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) co-sponsored bills on the around-the-nation high-speed rail system and the extension of Freeway No. 6. Indeed, the KMT marched the bills into committee for review and on March 15, KMT legislators marched into the legislature holding signs calling for full support of the Freeway No. 6 extension and the HSR. When Han ran for president, extending the HSR around the island was one of his programs.
The Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) said in a written report to the legislature that it had been evaluating the highway proposal since October of 2020 and that its feasibility evaluation should be released in August. It said that its policy is to prefer railways to highways, emphasizing public transportation on the east coast, “supplemented by private motor vehicles.”
Photo: Chiang Chih-hsiung, Taipei Times
ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL DISASTER
As proposed, the highway is an environmental and social disaster. Estimated to be 174 kilometers long, with 17 interchanges, it crosses the lands of nearly a dozen indigenous communities — who have say over whether their land is used — and travels through geologically sensitive areas. The cost is estimated at NT$255 billion. Once the HSR line and the Freeway No. 6 extension are added in, the cost will likely run into the trillions. Yet, Taitung County has a smaller population than Kaohsiung’s Fengshan District (鳳山), while Taitung city itself is barely two-thirds the size of Taichung’s Fengyuan District (豐原).
Well-known Taiwan commentator Brian Hioe (丘琦欣) observed that Fu’s machinations to get himself made caucus convener for the KMT in the legislature may reflect a desire to cash in on the kickbacks that will inevitably arise when these giant projects are built. Fu has served time for corruption cases and has been accused of tax evasion by the local prosecutor’s office.
Photo: Tung Chen-kuo, Liberty Times
Perhaps that is the case. No doubt when the HSR line is finally approved there will be a spate of stories in the media about politicians who purchased the land around them. There will also be another spate about how the patronage spending has helped the KMT feed and water its local networks by showering them with cash.
Fu is a skilled politician. In addition to serving as Hualien County magistrate, he has served in the legislature before, has chaired the Budget Committee and currently sits on the National Defense Committee. Fu is thus uniquely positioned to be aware of the effects of these large infrastructure projects on the budget.
And on defense.
The MOTC report on the Hualien-Taitung project warned that it would cause government spending to surge. The HSR and the extension of Freeway No. 6 across the mountains would pile more on that. I wonder if that is their intention.
The cross-island problem is particularly tempting and exciting because at present there is no four-lane highway that crosses the deep mountains. The existing routes are all subject to blockage by slides, causing politicians to grope at massive construction-industrial state solutions like tunneling directly under the mountains. When Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was running for president he promised to restore Highway No. 8 between Guguan (谷關) and Lishan (梨山) in Taichung, a two-lane route constantly in peril of either falling off the mountainside or being blocked by landslides. Today the work on the road keeps many locals employed.
DEFENSE
The construction-industrial state has another effect, though, besides enabling local politicians to bring home bacon to their districts: crowding out defense spending. Money that is spent bringing the HSR to tiny communities on the east coast is not going to be spent building drone factories and missile assembly lines.
The classic case of this is Japan, the construction-industrial political economy par excellence. For decades the US has prodded Tokyo to spend more on defense. Instead, Japan binged on public construction. It could not spend on defense, Tokyo maintained, partly because the 1947 Public Finance Law forbade the government from funding debt by issuing bonds. Faced with a rising challenge from Beijing, in 2022 the government decided to earmark US$3.22 billion for defense facilities and the construction of destroyers, among other expenditures, to be funded by ... selling construction bonds for public works projects. Tokyo’s choice made the connection obvious.
Taiwan’s defense spending for this year will hit a new record of 2.5 percent of GDP: NT$440 billion, or around twice the cost of Fu’s proposed and completely unnecessary Hualien-Taitung highway. To put it another way, if the proposed highway funding were instead devoted to defense, Taiwan’s defense budget would rise by 50 percent, robustly exceeding the very modest 3 percent figure the US has long demanded. If Fu wanted to reward his patrons, he could use the money to build a large drone factory in Hualien or Taitung to churn out drones for civilian and military applications.
I would argue that one long-unrecognized purpose of ever more gigantic construction-industrial state projects is not just “development” or even feeding and watering local patronage networks. I think they are more insidious: they leverage democratic processes to prevent Taiwan from assembling the budgetary resources it needs for defense by creating local constituencies for local construction expenditures.
The same budget this year that saw military spending reach unprecedented levels? It saw a 0.3 percent increase in public infrastructure spending, to NT$588 billion, roughly 1.3 times the record military budget.
Time to reverse these figures.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
May 18 to May 24 Pastor Yang Hsu’s (楊煦) congregation was shocked upon seeing the land he chose to build his orphanage. It was surrounded by mountains on three sides, and the only way to access it was to cross a river by foot. The soil was poor due to runoff, and large rocks strewn across the plot prevented much from growing. In addition, there was no running water or electricity. But it was all Yang could afford. He and his Indigenous Atayal wife Lin Feng-ying (林鳳英) had already been caring for 24 orphans in their home, and they were in
On May 2, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), at a meeting in support of Taipei city councilors at party headquarters, compared President William Lai (賴清德) to Hitler. Chu claimed that unlike any other democracy worldwide in history, no other leader was rooting out opposing parties like Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). That his statements are wildly inaccurate was not the point. It was a rallying cry, not a history lesson. This was intentional to provoke the international diplomatic community into a response, which was promptly provided. Both the German and Israeli offices issued statements on Facebook
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday delivered an address marking the first anniversary of his presidency. In the speech, Lai affirmed Taiwan’s global role in technology, trade and security. He announced economic and national security initiatives, and emphasized democratic values and cross-party cooperation. The following is the full text of his speech: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽), there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
RSS